| Literature DB >> 34836077 |
Agnieszka Stawarska1, Małgorzata Czerwonka1, Małgorzata Jelińska1, Iga Piasecka1, Barbara Bobrowska-Korczak1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of zinc supplementation (in the form of nano or microparticles) on the profile and metabolism of fatty acids in the liver microsomes of rats with induced breast cancer. The activity of desaturases (Δ5, Δ6, Δ9) and the level of cholesterol and its oxidized derivatives were measured. The aim of this study was also to determine the effect of various forms of zinc supplements on rats that were on 5-, 12- and 15-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic (5-, 12- and 15-HETE) and hydroxyoctadecadienoic (HODE) acids, and the level of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). Female Spraque-Dawley rats (n = 24) were divided into 2 groups that were supplemented with zinc in the micro form (342 nm) or nano form (99 nm) particles, respectively, and a group with a standard diet (control group). All animals received 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene twice for the induction of breast cancer. Dietary nano-Zn supplementation increased vaccenic acid content (p = 0.032) and decreased Δ6-desaturase activity (p = 0.006), whereas micro-Zn increased cholesterol (p = 0.006), ∑COPs (total cholesterol-oxidation products) (p = 0.019) and PGE2 (p = 0.028) content. Dietary enrichment with Zn microparticles resulted in lower concentrations of the metabolites 15-, 12- and 5-HETE and HODE. Our study indicates that the effect of zinc supplementation on the metabolism of fatty acids in the liver microsomes under neoplastic conditions depends on the form in which it is administered.Entities:
Keywords: HETE; HODE; Zinc; cholesterol; desaturases; fatty acid metabolism; nanoparticles; oxysterols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34836077 PMCID: PMC8623502 DOI: 10.3390/nu13113821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Fatty acid content in rat liver microsomes (μg/mL) (n = 8 per group).
| Standard Diet | Micro-Zn | Nano-Zn | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Lauric acid (C12:0) | 1.61 ± 0.33 | 1.94 ± 0.15 | 2.28 ± 1.33 | n.s. |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | 7.31 ± 1.97 | 7.04 ± 3.01 | 10.3 ± 5.7 | n.s. |
| Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) | 5.94 ± 1.00 | 6.23 ± 1.94 | 7.25 ± 3.19 | n.s. |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 838 ± 135 | 982 ± 251 | 1159 ± 543 | n.s. |
| Heptadecanoic acid (C17:0) | 17.1 ± 2.9 | 19.3 ± 2.5 | 18.5 ± 3.9 | n.s. |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 790 ± 187 b | 1044 ± 242 a,b | 1110 ± 136 a | 0.020 |
| Eicosanoic acid (C20:0) | n.d. ± 0.43 | 0.50 ± 0.17 a | 0.33 ± 0.06 a | <0.001 |
| ∑SFA | 1660 ± 305 | 2062 ± 176 | 2309 ± 691 | n.s. |
|
| ||||
| 9-Hexadecenoic acid (C16:1 n-9) | 4.31 ± 1.35 | 4.54 ± 1.98 | 6.78 ± 3.70 | n.s. |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1 n-7) | 14.2 ± 6.2 | 15.1 ± 6.0 | 25.4 ± 16.2 | n.s. |
| Oleic acid (C18:1 n-9 OL) | 229 ± 86 | 282 ± 90 | 416 ± 210 | n.s. |
| Vaccenic acid (C18:1 n-7) | 46.6± 9.7 b | 60.4 ± 7.3 a,b | 77.6 ± 31.6 a | 0.032 |
| Eicosenoic acid (C20:1 n-9) | 0.27 ± 0.46 | 1.37 ± 0.28 a | 1.67 ± 0.58 a | <0.001 |
| ∑MUFA | 295 ± 102 | 364 ± 104 | 528 ± 262 | n.s. |
|
| ||||
| Linoleic acid (C18:2 n-6 LA) | 699 ± 230 | 716 ± 236 | 1126 ± 584 | n.s. |
| γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3 n-6 GLA) | 7.02 ± 3.93 | 6.43 ± 4.24 | 15.6 ± 10.9 | n.s. |
| α-Linolenic acid (C18:3 n-3 ALA) | 19.9 ± 12.3 | 19.1 ± 14.0 | 39.1 ± 20.6 | n.s. |
| Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2 n-6) | 2.38 ± 0.86 | 2.12 ± 0.53 | 2.22 ± 0.68 | n.s. |
| Dihomo-γ-linolenoic (C20:3 n-6 DGLA) | 5.92 ± 1.21 | 5.66 ± 0.81 | 5.71 ± 2.03 | n.s. |
| Arachidonic acid (C20:4 n-6 AA) | 630 ± 206 | 720 ± 101 | 861 ± 372 | n.s. |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5 n-3 EPA) | 9.11 ± 2.91 | 8.03 ± 3.15 | 12.9 ± 5.5 | n.s. |
| Docosapentaenoic acid (C22:5 n-6 DPA) | 15.3 ± 3.1 | 15.9 ± 5.3 | 18.5 ± 8.8 | n.s. |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6 n-3 DHA) | 187 ± 51 | 215 ± 39 | 224 ± 99 | n.s. |
| ∑PUFA | 1476 ± 411 | 1710 ± 277 | 2306 ± 1081 | n.s. |
| n-3 | 231 ± 55 | 258 ± 45 | 295 ± 129 | n.s. |
| n-6 | 1245 ± 373 | 1451 ± 250 | 2011 ± 960 | n.s. |
Standard Diet—control group; Micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; Nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles; SFAs—saturated fatty acids; MUFAs—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFAs—polyunsaturated fatty acids; * one-way ANOVA (α ≤ 0.05); n.s.—no significant; a,b—homogenous groups in rows; post-hoc Tukey’s test (α ≤ 0.05); n.d.—not detected.
Share of the main groups of fatty acids in the total content and peroxidability and in rat liver microsomes (n = 8 per group).
| Standard Diet | Micro-Zn | Nano-Zn | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFA (%) | 48.8 ± 4.1 | 50.1 ± 5.1 | 46.3 ± 4.7 | n.s. |
| MUFA (%) | 8.56 ± 1.97 | 8.74 ± 1.92 | 10.0 ± 1.4 | n.s. |
| PUFA (%) | 42.6 ± 3.3 | 41.2 ± 3.8 | 43.7 ± 4.0 | n.s. |
| n-6/n-3 PUFA | 5.42 ± 1.13 | 5.67 ± 0.89 | 6.80 ± 1.03 | n.s. |
| (MUFA+PUFA)/SFA | 1.06 ± 0.17 | 1.02 ± 0.22 | 1.18 ± 0.21 | n.s. |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.88 ± 0.14 | 0.84 ± 0.18 | 0.96 ± 0.18 | n.s. |
| PI | 140 ± 17 | 134 ± 9 | 128 ± 12 | n.s. |
Standard diet—control group; micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles; SFAs—saturated fatty acids; MUFAs—monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFAs—polyunsaturated fatty acids; PI—peroxidability index; * one-way ANOVA (α ≤ 0.05); n.s.—no significant.
Figure 1AA (arachidonic acid) concentration increase (mg/100 mg protein) (A). Activities of D6D (B), D5D (C), D9D-16, D9D-18, D9D-total (D) in hepatic microsomes of experimental groups. Standard diet—control group; micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles; a,b,c—homogenous groups (α ≤ 0.05); D6D—Δ6-desaturase index; D5D—Δ5-desaturase index; D9D-16—Δ9-desaturase index for palmitic acid, D9D-18—Δ9-desaturase index for stearic acid; D9D total—Δ9-desaturase index.
Figure 2PGE2 (pg/g of liver) content in liver of experimental groups. Standard diet—control group; micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles. Values with a different letter index in one row are significantly different from each other (α ≤ 0.05) in post-hoc RIR Tukey test; PGE2—prostaglandin E2.
Fatty acid metabolites (ng/mg of protein) in liver microsomes obtained from rats supplemented with various forms of zinc.
| Standard Diet | Zn Micro | Zn Nano | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HODE | 19.6 ± 5.4 a | 7.8 ± 1.1 | 17.6 ± 6.6 a | 0.0017 |
| 15-HETE | 6.2 ± 1.6 | 5.5 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 1.7 | n.s. |
| 12-HETE | 4.6 ± 0.9 a | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 4.4 ± 0.9 a | <0.0001 |
| 5-HETE | 6.5 ± 1.8 a | 3.9 ± 1.4 | 6.1 ±1.3 a | 0.0045 |
Standard diet—control group; micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles; * one-way ANOVA (α ≤ 0.05); n.s.—no significant; a—homogenous groups in rows; post-hoc Tukey’s test (α ≤ 0.05).
Squalene, cholesterol and cholesterol-oxidation products (COPs) content in rat liver microsomes (n = 8 per group).
| [μg/ mL] | Standard Diet | Zn Micro | Zn Nano | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squalene | 7.10 ± 4.79 | 10.4 ± 4.2 | 8.47 ± 3.44 | n.s. |
| Cholesterol | 152 ± 37 b | 258 ± 85 a | 204 ± 41 a,b | 0.006 |
| 7K-Ch | 1.10 ± 0.58 a,b | 2.26 ± 1.58 a | 0.89 ± 0.37 b | 0.026 |
| 7α-OH-Ch | 0.39 ± 0.17 a,b | 0.66 ± 0.34 a | 0.33 ± 0.09 b | 0.022 |
| 7β-OH-Ch | 0.17 ± 0.09 a | 0.38 ± 0.24 | 0.17 ± 0.05 a | 0.018 |
| 5.6βE-Ch | 0.44 ± 0.21 a,b | 0.81 ± 0.45 a | 0.38 ± 0.13 b | 0.020 |
| ∑COPs | 2.11 ± 1.02 a,b | 4.10 ± 2.51 a | 1.77 ± 0.61 b | 0.019 |
| COPs/Ch [%] | 1.40 ± 0.66 | 1.55 ± 0.83 | 0.86 ± 0.22 | n.s. |
Standard diet—control group; micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles; 7K-Ch—7-ketocholesterol; 7α-OH-Ch—7α-hydroxycholesterol; 7β-OH-Ch—7β-hydroxycholesterol; 5,6βE-Ch—5β,6β-epoxycholesterol; COPs—cholesterol-oxidation products; * one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05); n.s.—no significant; a,b—homogenous groups in rows; post-hoc Tukey’s test (α ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3Dendrogram of similarity in lipid components’ content in rat liver microsomes; C1-C2—clusters. Standard diet—control group; micro-Zn—group receiving zinc in microparticles; nano-Zn—group receiving zinc in nanoparticles.