| Literature DB >> 34835070 |
Wenqiang Sun1,2,3, He Zhang2,3, Wenhui Fan2, Lihong He2,4, Teng Chen5, Xintao Zhou5, Yu Qi5, Lei Sun2,4, Rongliang Hu5, Tingrong Luo1, Wenjun Liu1,2,3,4, Jing Li2,4.
Abstract
African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes acute hemorrhagic fever in domestic pigs and wild boars, resulting in incalculable economic losses to the pig industry. As the mechanism of viral infection is not clear, protective antigens have not been discovered or identified. In this study, we determined that the p30, pp62, p72, and CD2v proteins were all involved in the T cell immune response of live pigs infected with ASFV, among which p72 and pp62 proteins were the strongest. Panoramic scanning was performed on T cell epitopes of the p72 protein, and three high-frequency positive epitopes were selected to construct a swine leukocyte antigen (SLA)-tetramer, and ASFV-specific T cells were detected. Subsequently, the specific T cell and humoral immune responses of ASFV-infected pigs and surviving pigs were compared. The results demonstrate that the specific T cellular immunity responses gradually increased during the infection and were higher than that in the surviving pigs in the late stages of infection. The same trend was observed in specific humoral immune responses, which were highest in surviving pigs. In general, our study provides key information for the exploration of ASFV-specific immune responses and the development of an ASFV vaccine.Entities:
Keywords: African swine fever virus; T cell immune response; T epitopes; p72; protective antigen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34835070 PMCID: PMC8617699 DOI: 10.3390/v13112264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Figure 1Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from surviving ASFV-infected pigs responded to ASFV protein expression. The ELISPOT assay verified the ability of the 4 ASFV proteins and the inactivated ASFV to stimulate the production of IFN-γ on PBMCs of the surviving pigs (n = 20). A total of 0.5 μg/mL concanavalin A (Con A) was used as a positive stimulation. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM. p-values were determined by one-way ANOVA (ns, p > 0.05; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; and **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 2Prediction of p72 porcine leukocyte antigen (SLA) class I-restricted T cell epitopes and screening of positive epitopes. The p72 protein (full length of 646 aa) contains 466 possible peptides, each about 9–14 aa (Supplementary data). The screening of positive epitopes through the peptide library for stimulation of the PBMCs of surviving pigs (n = 16) by ELISPOT assay. Response rates of various peptides in surviving pigs (n = 16). (a) Peptide 351 (P351); (b) peptide 334 (P334); and (c), peptide 366 (P366).
Figure 3Prediction of SLA-I allele affinity of positive peptides, complex crystal structure analysis, and construction of SLA-I tetramers. (A) The affinity of peptides (P334, P351, and P366) and SLA-I alleles was predicted by using IEDB MHC-I Binding Predictions software. The best matching alleles with the highest score were selected. The higher the score is, the better the binding. (B–D) The crystal structures of the interaction complex between peptide and SLA-I allele were predicted by GalaxyPepDock protein peptide docking software, and the structure model with the highest estimated accuracy value was selected as the optimal structure of the complex. The crystal structure shows the interaction between amino acids and peptides in the SLA-I binding pocket. P334 interacts with SLA-I*0101 (B), P351 interacts with SLA-I*0301 (C), and P366 interacts with SLA-I*1201 (D). (E,F) Schematic diagram of SLA-tetramer construction. The single-chain trimer (SCT) technique was used to connect the peptide, light chain β2m, and heavy chain SLA-I in series with flexible linkers (F). The monomeric SCT was assembled into tetramers by streptavidin with PE fluorescence.
Figure 4Clinical trials and humoral immunity levels of ASFV-infected pigs and the comparison with surviving pigs. (A) Procedures for ASFV infection in pigs. In the infected group, a pig (a#) was infected with ASFV by intramuscular injection and cohabitated with other pigs (b# to g#). In the placebo group, a pig (h#) was intramuscularly injected with PBS and cohabitated with other pigs (i# to n#). The PBMCs and serum samples of surviving pigs (Pig 2#, Pig 3#, Pig 5#, Pig 7#, Pig 10#, and Pig 14#) were selected as convalescent pigs. Rectal temperature monitoring and blood collection was performed at the indicated time points (dpi) after infection. (B) Trend of rectal temperature at different time points in ASFV-infected pigs. (C) Survival curves of pigs challenged with ASFV (1 artificial infection and the other six contact infection pigs) or PBS (one intramuscularly injected with PBS and the other 6 contact-infected pigs) (D) Blood viral load of ASFV-infected pigs at different time points. (E) Titers of anti-p72, -pp62, and -p30 specific IgG in pigs infected with ASFV. The dotted horizontal lines represent the quantitative limits of ELISA and viral RNA load. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM. p-values were determined by one-way ANOVA (* p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; and **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 5Differences of CD8+ T cells between ASFV-infected pigs and surviving pigs at different time points. (A) The proportion of CD8+-specific T cells after ASFV infection was measured by flow cytometry assays of PBMCs stained with tri-PE-tetramer (the mixture of PE-Tera-P334, PE-Tera-P351, and PE-Tera-P366). (B) Statistical analysis of the proportion of CD8+-specific T cells after ASFV infection at different time points. The data are shown as the mean ± SEM. p-values were determined by one-way ANOVA (*** p < 0.001; and **** p < 0.0001).