| Literature DB >> 34831697 |
Faith Miaomiao Zheng1, Iliana Gehui Yan1, Duangporn Duangthip1, Sherry Shiqian Gao2, Edward Chin Man Lo1, Chun Hung Chu1.
Abstract
This cross-sectional survey investigated untreated early childhood caries (ECC) and its associated factors among 5-year-old children in Hong Kong. Children were recruited using a multistage sampling method. One dentist examined the children in kindergarten to diagnose untreated ECC (dt) at the cavitation level. Each child's demographic information, snacking behaviour, and oral health-related practice were collected using a parental questionnaire. The relationships between the untreated ECC and demographic information, snacking behaviours, and oral health--related practice were analysed by zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression analysis. This survey recruited 404 children. Their dt score was 2.8 ± 3.8. The significant untreated ECC (SiUC) index, which was one-third of the children with the highest dt score, was 7.1 ± 3.6. Their untreated ECC prevalence was 57%, which was associated with the district the child lived in. Most children with untreated ECC (71%, 164/231) had never visited a dentist. Children who brushed without toothpaste had more untreated ECC. Children coming from low-income families and with a lower maternal education level had a higher risk of ECC. In conclusion, untreated ECC was prevalent and unevenly distributed among 5-year-old children in Hong Kong. Its prevalence was associated with toothpaste use, family income, maternal education level and the district they lived in.Entities:
Keywords: caries; children; kindergarten; outreach; prevention
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34831697 PMCID: PMC8625624 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Untreated ECC index (dt) of 5-year-old children in Hong Kong (n = 404).
Figure 2Distribution of untreated ECC index of 5-year-old children in Hong Kong (n = 404).
Untreated ECC prevalence and significant untreated ECC (SiUC) according to sex, birthplace and district they lived in.
| Variables ( | Untreated ECC | Mean | Mean | Mean | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 57% | 2.8 (3.8) | 7.1 (3.6) | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Hong Kong Island a (54) | 43% | 1.5 (2.4) | 163 | a < b | 4.2 (2.5) | a < b, c | |
| Kowloon b (121) | 69% | 3.5 (4.1) | 227 | 8.3 (3.8) | |||
| New Territories c (229) | 55% | 2.7 (3.7) | 199 | 7.1 (3.4) | |||
|
| 0.174 | 0.077 |
| ||||
| Yes a (45) | 56% | 2.6 (3.6) | 198 | 6.8 (3.5) | |||
| No b (357) | 67% | 4.1 (4.8) | 229 | 10.1 (3.2) | a > b | ||
|
| 0.480 | 0.256 | 0.369 | ||||
| Boys (216) | 56% | 2.6 (3.6) | 197 | 6.6 (3.6) | |||
| Girls (188) | 59% | 3.0 (3.9) | 209 | 7.7 (3.5) |
1 Comparison of ECC prevalence; 2 Comparison of the mean dt; 3 Comparison of the mean SiUC; Bold: p-value p < 0.05.
Untreated ECC prevalence (dt > 0) and independent variables.
| Variables ( | Untreated ECC Prevalence | Pairwise Comparison | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Secondary school or below a | 282 (70%) | 64% | ||
| Post-secondary school b | 122 (30%) | 41% | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Below 15,000 a | 99 (24%) | 72% | ||
| 15,001 to 30,000 a | 201 (50%) | 60% | ||
| Over 30,000 b | 104 (26%) | 39% | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Secondary school or below a | 170 (67%) | 62% | ||
| Post-secondary school b | 130 (33%) | 47% | ||
|
|
| |||
| Yes | 43 (11%) | 42% | ||
| No | 361 (89%) | 59% | ||
|
| 0.120 | |||
| Yes | 263 (65%) | 55% | ||
| No | 141 (35%) | 62% | ||
|
| 0.090 | |||
| Yes | 53 (13%) | 68% | ||
| No | 351 (87%) | 56% | ||
|
| 0.740 | |||
| Yes | 287 (71%) | 58% | ||
| No | 116 (29%) | 56% |
p-value attained by chi-square test, and bold figure: p-value < 0.05.
Untreated ECC (dt) and independent variables.
| Variables ( | Mean dt Score (SD) | Mean Rank of dt | Pairwise Comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Secondary school or below a | 3.3 (3.9) | 219 | ||
| Post-secondary school b | 1.7 (3.1) | 164 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Below 15,000 a | 4.1 (4.4) | 240 | ||
| 15,001 to 30,000 b | 2.8 (3.7) | 207 | ||
| Over 30,000 c | 1.4 (2.6) | 157 | ||
|
|
|
| ||
| Secondary school or below a | 3.1 (3.9) | 210 | ||
| Post-secondary school | 2.1 (3.4) | 176 | ||
|
|
| |||
| Yes | 3.9 (4.4) | 232 | ||
| No | 2.6 (3.6) | 198 | ||
|
|
| |||
| Yes | 1.7 (2.8) | 167 | ||
| No | 2.9 (3.8) | 207 | ||
|
| 0.072 | |||
| Yes | 2.7 (3.8) | 195 | ||
| No | 3.0 (3.6) | 216 | ||
|
| 0.920 | |||
| Yes | 2.8 (3.8) | 202 | ||
| No | 2.7 (3.6) | 201 |
p-value attained by Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis H test, and bold figure means p-value less than 0.05.
Final model of zero-inflated negative binomial analysis of untreated ECC and risk factors.
| Negative Binomial Portion of the Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables ( | Incidence Risk Ratio | 95% Confidence Interval | Pairwise Comparison | |
|
|
|
| ||
| * Below 15,000 a | ||||
| 15,001 to 30,000 b | 0.801 | 0.093 | (0.619, 1.037) | |
| Over 30,000 c | 0.589 |
| (0.408, 0.852) | |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| * Below 15,000 a | ||||
| 15,001 to 30,000 b | 1.770 | 0.123 | (0.857, 3.655) | |
| Over 30,000 c | 3.455 |
| (1.524, 7.830) | |
|
|
| |||
| * Secondary school | ||||
| Post-secondary school | 2.211 | (1.238, 3.949) | ||
|
|
| |||
| * No | ||||
| Yes | 2.362 | (1.022, 5.463) | ||
# Bold figure: p-value < 0.05; * Reference group.