| Literature DB >> 34831695 |
Jianping Zhang1, Zhenling Chen1, Weidong Liu1, Pengxin Ding1, Qinggang Wu1.
Abstract
The fatigue of air traffic controllers (ATCOs) on duty seriously threatens air traffic safety and needs to be managed. ATCOs perform several different types of work, with each type of work having different characteristics. Nonetheless, the influence of work type on an ATCO's fatigue has yet to be demonstrated. Here, we present a field study in which the fatigue of ATCOs working in two types of work was compared based on an optimized data-driven method that was employed to detect the percentage of eyelid closure over the pupil over time (PERCLOS). Sixty-seven ATCOs working within two typical jobs (i.e., from the terminal control unit (TCU) and area control unit (ACU)) were recruited, and their fatigue was detected immediately before and after shift work using PERCLOS. Using a Spearman correlation test analysis, the results showed that the influence of work type on an ATCO's fatigue had interesting trends. Specifically, the ATCOs at the TCU who handle departures and arrivals, which include converging with and maneuvering around conflicts, retain normal circadian rhythms. Their fatigue was significantly influenced by the various demands from tasks focusing on sequencing and conflict resolution and by the time phase of a normal circadian rhythm. At the ACU, ATCOs manage flights that are mainly on route, causing monotonous monitoring and routine reporting tasks, and the ATCOs generally have frequent night shifts to handle overflights. Their fatigue was significantly influenced by the demand characteristics from tasks, but changes in fatigue rule were not consistent with a normal circadian rhythm, revealing that the ATCOs' circadian rhythms may have already been slightly disturbed. Furthermore, the interactions between task demand and circadian rhythm with an ATCO's fatigue were significantly observed in ATCOs working in the TCU but not in those in the ACU. This study provides first evidence that an ATCO's work type influences his or her fatigue. This discovery may incite stakeholders to consider work type in the management of employee fatigue, not only in the civil aviation industry but also in other transport industries.Entities:
Keywords: PERCLOS; air traffic controller; data-driven; fatigue; traffic safety; work type
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34831695 PMCID: PMC8622576 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Diagram of control area.
Figure 2Process of video treatment for detecting air traffic controllers’ PERCLOS values.
Comparison of the effectiveness for the face detection between previous and current method.
| Sample No. | Total Frames | Previous Method Detection Numbers | Previous Method Detection Rate | Current Method Detection Numbers | Current Method Detection Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14,521 | 9494 | 65.38% | 13,494 | 92.93% |
| 2 | 14,521 | 11,062 | 76.18% | 12,577 | 86.61% |
| 3 | 14,521 | 10,102 | 69.57% | 14,250 | 98.13% |
| 4 | 14,521 | 8953 | 61.66% | 13,053 | 89.89% |
| 5 | 14,521 | 9903 | 68.20% | 13,344 | 91.89% |
| average | 14,521 | 9494 | 65.38% | 13,494 | 92.93% |
Performance from the PERCLOS detection.
| Name | Speed of Image Collection | Frame | Date Bit Rate | Frame Width | Frame Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 24/second | 24 FPS/second | 14 Mbps/second | 640 pixel | 480 pixel |
Description of the 2 × 2 × 4 three-factor mixed experimental design.
| Factors | Levels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Work type | TCU | ACU | ||
| Task demand | Pre-shift | Post-shift | ||
| Circadian rhythm | Shift I | Shift II | Shift III | Shift IV |
Figure 3Scheme of the relationship among ATCOs’ fatigue, work type, task demand, and circadian rhythm.
General information of the ATCO participants.
| Work Type | Age | Gender | People Number | Shift I | Shift II | Shift III | Shift IV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCU | 23–36 | Male | 32 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 4 |
| ACU | 23–38 | Male | 35 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
| Total | -- | -- | 67 | 14 | 23 | 21 | 11 |
Data analysis methods of the PERCLOS values.
| Factors | PERCLOS Value Index | Data Analysis Methods |
|---|---|---|
| Work type | change, pre-shift, and post-shift | Spearman correlation test |
| Task demand | change | Wilcoxon matched-pairs test |
| Circadian rhythm | pre-shift | Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), One-way ANOVA, and multiple comparison analysis |
| Interaction between circadian rhythm and task demand | pre- and post-shift | Multiple-factor repeated measures ANOVA |
Figure 4Changes in PERCLOS values of ATCOs by shift and work type.
Figure 5Pre-shift PERCLOS values of ATCOs by shift and work type.
Figure 6Post-shift PERCLOS values of ATCOs by shift and work type.
Comparing task demand influence on the PERCLOS values by work types.
| Statistical Method | TCU | ACU |
|---|---|---|
| Wilcoxon matched-pairs test |
Comparing task demands and ATCOs’ fatigue changes in the TCU and ACU.
| Task Demand | Shift I | Shift II | Shift III | Shift IV | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCU | ACU | TCU | ACU | TCU | ACU | TCU | ACU | ||
| Flight volume | arrival | 10 | 10 | 26 | 26 | 28 | 28 | 8 | 8 |
| departure | 40 | 40 | 26 | 26 | 22 | 22 | 12 | 12 | |
| overflight | 5 | 164 | 6 | 143 | 5 | 126 | 1 | 28 | |
| Monitoring time (min) | 10.0 | 23.0 | 10.8 | 22.8 | 11.6 | 21.1 | 12.3 | 20.7 | |
| Heading change | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.4 | |
| Speed change | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | |
| Altitude change | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | |
| Change PERCLOS value | 7.2 | 16.7 | 7.3 | 8 | 24.9 | 17.2 | 1 | 3.6 | |
Figure 7PERCLOS values of ATCOs at the TCU by shift.
Comparisons of the influence of circadian rhythm on ATCOs’ PERCLOS values by work type.
| Statistical Method | TCU | ACU |
|---|---|---|
| Repeated measures ANOVA | Among the shifts **, F (3, 28) = 7.07, | Among the shifts, F (3, 31) = 0.99, |
| One-way ANOVA | Pre-shift **, F (3, 31) = 7.071, | Pre-shift *, F (3, 34) = 3.145, |
| Multiple comparison analysis using repeated measures | Shift I vs. shift III **, | No significant difference by shift was observed. |
| Multiple comparison analysis for pre-shift values | Shift IV vs. shift I **, | Shift II vs. shift I *, |
| Multiple comparison analysis for post-shift values | Shift I vs. shift III **, | No significant difference between the shifts was observed. |
* Significant difference, ** very significant difference.
Figure 8PERCLOS values of ATCOs at the ACU by shifts.
Comparisons for the influence of the interaction between task demand and circadian rhythm on PERCLOS values by work type.
| Statistical Method | TCU | ACU |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple-factor repeated measures ANOVA | F (3, 28) = 4.13; | F (3,31) = 0.72, |