| Literature DB >> 34831657 |
Ekaterine Ruadze1, Giovanni S Leonardi2,3, Ayoub Saei4, Irma Khonelidze1, Lela Sturua1, Vladimer Getia1, Helen Crabbe2, Tim Marczylo2, Paolo Lauriola5, Amiran Gamkrelidze1.
Abstract
In recent years, reports of lead contamination have dramatically increased in Georgia. Given concerns about the exposure of children to lead (Pb), the National Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS-2018) included a blood sampling component. The results showed that 41% of the children that participated had blood Pb levels (BLL) ≥ 5 µg/dL and that BLL in children living in Western Georgia were higher than those in Eastern regions. In response to these findings, NCDC implemented written and verbal advice to the families of children who participated in the MICS-2018 on how to reduce Pb exposure. From August 2019 onwards, the state program of clinical follow-up was implemented. The design of this study was a longitudinal study. The intervention of interest was the public health advice and medical follow-up, and the outcome was defined as the difference in BLL between the MICS-2018 survey and the state program follow-up. We observed a significant overall reduction in median BLL between MICS-2018 and state program follow-up in both August 2019 and the latest results (until December 2019). However, we did not observe any significant further reduction between August and the most recent BLL results. In the Georgian setting, written and verbal communication targeting individual households, alongside home visits to the most exposed, effectively reduced BLL in children.Entities:
Keywords: Georgia; lead (Pb); multiple stakeholder response; public health interventions; state program; written and verbal communication
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34831657 PMCID: PMC8621835 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182211903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Brief description of the information and advice/recommendations provided to parents.
| Lead-Related Topic | Information and Advice Provided to Parents |
|---|---|
| 1. Effects of lead on child’s health | Lead adversely affects mental development such as cognitive skills and learning abilities. Lead can affect hearing, behavior, growth and intellectual development. |
| 2. Main symptoms | Reduced learning ability; low scores in intellectual assessment tests; restricted growth and development; attention and concentration problems; speech-related problems; low academic scores; coordination problems; behavior problems; hyperactivity. |
| Advice/recommendations provided | |
| 1. Behavior-related advice | Deny access to surfaces with lead paint or with any flaking paint; regularly wash your child’s hands and wash child’s toys; regularly wet-clean your home; avoid use of folk-medicines; pay attention that your child has no access to cosmetic products; protect children from construction and renovation works; protect yourself during house re-construction works from exposure to lead-containing materials; do not smoke around your children; do not let children go near landfills or waste sites; pay attention that your children have no contact with bare soil (do not play with/in soil). If it is possible, provide your children with special playing sand boxes, or arrange to surface bare soil with grass or wood. |
| 2. Diet-related advice | |
| A diet rich in calcium strengthens bones and increases elimination of lead from the body. | Milk and milk products, such as yogurt and cheese; green leafy vegetables, such as cabbage, turnip, mustard and greens; calcium-fortified food, such as orange juice, soya milk and tofu; canned salmon and sardines. |
| Iron hinders lead absorption; try to eat food rich in iron. | Lean red meat; iron-fortified cereals, bread and pasta; dried fruits, such asraisins and black plums; kidney beans and lentils. |
| Vitamin C improves iron absorption in the body, which can replace the lead in the body. | Citrus fruit, such as orange and grapefruit; other fruit, such as kiwi, strawberry, melon; tomato; potato; pepper. |
Summary of the median changes in Pb concentration (µg/dL) between MICS Survey (2018) and state program (2019).
| Region | N | MICS Survey, 2018 Median and IQR Pb Concentration | N | State Program | N | State Program Most Recent Result (September−December, 2019) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 423 | 9.6 [6.8–14.1] | 364 | 7.1 [4.6–11.1] | 315 | 6.8 [4.3–10.6] |
| Adjara | 96 | 11.0 [7.3–19.8] | 84 | 9.4 [6.5–15.1] | 79 | 10.2 [6.8–16.4] |
| Guria | 99 | 11.0 [8.6–15.8] | 91 | 8.7 [6.6–12.0] | 83 | 8.8 [5.7–11.8] |
| Imereti | 56 | 9.3 [6.7–13.5] | 52 | 5.5 [4.2–9.1] | 44 | 6.8 [4.5–10.1] |
| Kakheti | 15 | 6.5 [5.3–9.1] | 11 | 4.0 [3.0–7.0] | 5 | 2.9 [2.0–3.2] |
| Mtskheta | 18 | 7.7 [5.9–11.0] | 11 * | 5.1 [4.6–6.9] | 16 * | 4.1 [2.9–7.6] |
| Kvemo Kartli | 9 | 6.8 [5.6–8.2] | 8 | 4.6 [4.1–5.5] | 3 | 4.9 [3.1–9.8] |
| Samegrelo | 57 | 9.4 [7.4–12.5] | 53 | 6.2 [4.4–8.5] | 41 | 6.6 [4.3–8.0] |
| Samtskhe−Javakheti | 12 | 8.3 [6.1–15.4] | 6 * | 9.7 [4.5–16.0] | 10 * | 7.5 [4.1–10.9] |
| Shida kartli | 38 | 7.9 [5.9–10.0] | 29 | 4.2 [3.1–5.0] | 23 | 4.7 [3.2–6.8] |
| Tbilisi | 23 | 8.3 [6.3–10.8] | 19 | 5.2 [3.9–9.6] | 11 | 6.9 [5.3–9.2] |
* Number of children providing samples after August increased because some families could not attend August appointments.
Parameter estimates and associated statistics.
| Effect | N | Estimate | Standard Error | Pr > |t| | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 423 * | 2.4 | 0.08 | 29.05 | <0.0001 |
| East | 423 | −0.22 | 0.11 | −1.85 | 0.0641 |
| East * August | 423 | −0.52 | 0.05 | −11.30 | <0.0001 |
| East * Recent | 423 | −0.56 | 0.05 | −12.13 | <0.0001 |
| West * August | 423 | −0.29 | 0.03 | −11.62 | <0.0001 |
| West * Recent | 423 | −0.33 | 0.03 | −13.03 | <0.0001 |
| Intercept | 256 ** | 2.4 | 0.09 | 24.870 | <0.0001 |
| East | 256 | −0.14 | 0.16 | −0.920 | 0.356 |
| East * August | 256 | −0.39 | 0.07 | −5.690 | <0.0001 |
| East * Recent | 256 | −0.48 | 0.07 | −6.940 | <0.0001 |
| West * August | 256 | −0.26 | 0.03 | −9.080 | <0.0001 |
| West * Recent | 256 | −0.305 | 0.029 | −10.680 | <0.0001 |
* The whole cohort; ** only those tested in August as well as after August.
Pairwise comparisons between different BLL analysis points (August 2019 vs. MICS-2018; Recent vs. MICS-2018; August 2019 vs. recent) in West and East parts of Georgia.
| Label | N | Estimate | Standard Error | Pr > |t| | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East vs. West in August | 423 * | −0.23 | 0.05 | −4.3 | <0.0001 |
| East vs. West in Recent | 423 | −0.23 | 0.05 | −4.4 | <0.0001 |
| August vs. Recent in East | 423 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.84 | 0.4029 |
| August vs. Recent in West | 423 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 1.42 | 0.1558 |
| East vs. West in August | 256 ** | −0.14 | 0.08 | −1.81 | 0.0707 |
| East vs. West in Recent | 256 | −0.18 | 0.08 | −2.36 | 0.0182 |
| August vs. Recent in East | 256 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 1.26 | 0.2092 |
| August vs. Recent in West | 256 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 1.59 | 0.1099 |
* The whole cohort; ** only those tested in August as well as after August.