| Literature DB >> 34830471 |
Tomasz Jan Kolanowski1, Weronika Wargocka-Matuszewska2, Agnieszka Zimna1, Lukasz Cheda2, Joanna Zyprych-Walczak3, Anna Rugowska4, Monika Drabik5, Michał Fiedorowicz5, Seweryn Krajewski6, Łukasz Steczek6, Cezary Kozanecki6, Zbigniew Rogulski2, Natalia Rozwadowska1, Maciej Kurpisz1.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), with myocardial infarction (MI) being one of the crucial components, wreak havoc in developed countries. Advanced imaging technologies are required to obtain quick and widely available diagnostic data. This paper describes a multimodal approach to in vivo perfusion imaging using the novel SYN1 tracer based on the fluorine-18 isotope. The NOD-SCID mice were injected intravenously with SYN1 or [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) radiotracers after induction of the MI. In all studies, the positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) technique was used. To obtain hemodynamic data, mice were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Finally, the biodistribution of the SYN1 compound was performed using Wistar rat model. SYN1 showed normal accumulation in mouse and rat hearts, and MI hearts correctly indicated impaired cardiac segments when compared to [18F]-FDG uptake. In vivo PET/CT and MRI studies showed statistical convergence in terms of the size of the necrotic zone and cardiac function. This was further supported with RNAseq molecular analyses to correlate the candidate function genes' expression, with Serpinb1c, Tnc and Nupr1, with Trem2 and Aldolase B functional correlations showing statistical significance in both SYN1 and [18F]-FDG. Our manuscript presents a new fluorine-18-based perfusion radiotracer for PET/CT imaging that may have importance in clinical applications. Future research should focus on confirmation of the data elucidated here to prepare SYN1 for first-in-human trials.Entities:
Keywords: FDG; RNAseq of the heart tissue; SYN1; [18F]-FDG; fluorine radiotracers; molecular profiling after myocardial infarction; positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34830471 PMCID: PMC8619497 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Comparison of the perfusion-based SYN1 vs. metabolic [18F]-FDG signalling using PET/CT with inclusion of MRI results in MI mice and the control group. A high signal-to-signal variation could be observed in the batch analysis of MI-affected groups with both radiotracers – individual and mean signal values has been presented (A). Hearts (and normalized signals) were divided into five isovolumetric segments with most differences observed in segments 4 and 5 when compared to the control (B). Representation of each segment of the individual heart showing heterogeneity of signals in MI affected hearts (patterned bars) compared to control (nonpatterned bars) (C). The highest heterogeneity was observed in the case of medium-sized MI (7% < LV EF < 35%). (D) Results have been grouped based on the MI size as evaluated by MRI. These were: small MI (LV EF > 35%), medium MI (7% > LV EF > 35%), large MI (LV EF < 7%) and nonaffected control; each bar represents different heart segments from 1 to 5 (from left to right). Statistically significant differences in the signal distribution in the heart have been observed in medium and large MI groups. In all cases, groups have been marked according to the legend with full bars marking SYN1-based measurements and empty-interior bars indicating [18F]-FDG measurements. In both cases, bars with the slash-like pattern are considered MI groups while nonpatterned bars are the control groups. p-value: * <0.033; ** <0.002; *** <0.001.
Figure 2Analysis of expression profile in control vs. stable MI group. (A) A volcano plot of up- and down-regulated genes with genes of particular interest marked. RNAseq analysis was performed using following criteria: p < 0.01; −2 > logFC > 2; only RNA targets with known/predicted function; minimal prevalence for target gene in the sample with higher expression = 100 reads (of 75 bp each). (B) Confirmation of expression in PET/CT group of mice using RNAseq. All results have been normalized to GAPDH expression. Dots represent particular samples, while bars represent mean ± SD. p-values ≤ 0.1 were considered to be significant.
Figure 3Correlation between gene expression and heart perfusion, metabolic and functional parameters. Above the graphs: SYN1-PET/CT scans of mice in the abdominal and lateral positions. FDG-PET-PET scans of the same mouse in the abdominal and lateral positions. MRI imaging— heart scans in three planes. Red circles indicate visible losses of marker accumulation and places of myocardial impairment. SYN1, [18F]-FDG and MRI parameters (LV EF, LVEDV, LV mass) have been correlated with expression pattern of selected genes (Serpinb1c, Nupr1, Trem2, Tnc and Aldob). For each correlation, a linear regression analysis was performed. Charts include 95% CI (dashed line). Values p ≤ 0.1 are considered to be significant. Detailed data discussion in the main text.
Figure 4Biodistribution pattern of SYN1 in control rats. Above the graphs rats’ PET images of dynamic biodistribution of SYN1 are presented. Images represent all three planes at 20 min of color-coded images and a grayscale scan in the dorsal plane showing the average accumulation of the radiotracer in the body of each of the 4 animals. Red circles indicate exactly outlined myocardium on the lateral and dorsal planes. For analysis, signal was traced in 25 timepoints over 45 min for each of four animals (represented on the top of the figure) and collected for four different organs: heart, liver, lungs and kidneys (A–D). (E) Mean value with SEM for each organ. (F) Relative value of signal in the heart in relation to lungs, liver and kidneys. Dotted line represents 1:1 ratio.
Figure 5Experimental design and timeline of the procedure.
List of the primers and their detailed specification used in the mouse gene expression study.
| ID | Species | Gene | Product (bp) | R2 | Efficiency | Cq | Cm (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qMmuCID0008546 |
|
| 124 | 0.9999 | 100% | 23.11 | 88 |
| qMmuCID0025322 |
|
| 149 | 0.9996 | 99% | 20.81 | 85 |
| qMmuCID0017767 |
|
| 95 | 0.9999 | 100% | 24.14 | 80 |
| qMmuCID0018300 |
|
| 100 | 0.9999 | 96% | 24.12 | 80.5 |
| qMmuCID0024737 |
|
| 179 | 0.9996 | 96% | 25.3 | 86 |
| qMmuCED0001658 |
|
| 126 | 0.9995 | 102% | 27.47 | 86.5 |
| qMmuCID0007257 |
|
| 152 | 0.9993 | 98% | 21.18 | 84.5 |
| qMmuCID0020213 |
|
| 125 | 0.9994 | 96% | 22 | 79.5 |
| qMmuCED0039716 |
|
| 112 | 0.9998 | 95% | 28.82 | 79 |
| qMmuCID0012108 |
|
| 97 | 0.9998 | 98% | 24.92 | 87 |
| qMmuCED0040037 |
|
| 94 | 0.9932 | 103% | 20.4 | 79.5 |
| qMmuCID0005706 |
|
| 87 | 0.9994 | 98% | 20.12 | 80.5 |
| qMmuCID0006635 |
|
| 63 | 0.9994 | 96% | 21.26 | 79 |
| qMmuCID0018270 |
|
| 120 | 0.9997 | 96% | 19.55 | 84 |
| qMmuCID0016589 |
|
| 86 | 0.9997 | 101% | 21.07 | 82 |
| qMmuCID0007732 |
|
| 141 | 0.9991 | 100% | 27.8 | 89 |
| qMmuCID0005679 |
|
| 70 | 0.9998 | 94% | 19.17 | 77 |
| qMmuCID0040542 |
|
| 102 | 0.9997 | 97% | 21.36 | 84.5 |
| qMmuCED0027505 |
|
| 109 | 0.9996 | 101% | 12.52 | 84 |