| Literature DB >> 34830092 |
Božena Klodová1,2, Jan Fíla1.
Abstract
Angiosperm mature pollen represents a quiescent stage with a desiccated cytoplasm surrounded by a tough cell wall, which is resistant to the suboptimal environmental conditions and carries the genetic information in an intact stage to the female gametophyte. Post pollination, pollen grains are rehydrated, activated, and a rapid pollen tube growth starts, which is accompanied by a notable metabolic activity, synthesis of novel proteins, and a mutual communication with female reproductive tissues. Several angiosperm species (Arabidopsis thaliana, tobacco, maize, and kiwifruit) were subjected to phosphoproteomic studies of their male gametophyte developmental stages, mostly mature pollen grains. The aim of this review is to compare the available phosphoproteomic studies and to highlight the common phosphoproteins and regulatory trends in the studied species. Moreover, the pollen phosphoproteome was compared with root hair phosphoproteome to pinpoint the common proteins taking part in their tip growth, which share the same cellular mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: kinase motif; male gametophyte; phosphoproteomics; pollen tube; root hair; signal transduction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34830092 PMCID: PMC8619407 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Summary of the publications that presented angiosperm male gametophyte phosphoproteomes.
| Species | Citation | Enrichment Technique | Studied Stages | Number of Identified Phosphoproteins | Number of Identified Phosphopeptides | Number of Identified Phosphorylation Sites | pSer:pThr: | Phosphorylation Motifs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mature Pollen | Activated Pollen | ||||||||
|
| Mayank et al. 2012 [ | IMAC, TiO2–MOAC, SIMAC | × | 598 | 962 | 609 | 86:14:0.16 | 1 prolyl-directed (xxxxxxS*Pxxxxx) | |
|
| Fíla et al. 2012 [ | Al(OH)3–MOAC, TiO2–MOAC of the already identified peptides | × | × | 139 | 52 | 52 | 67.3:32.7:0 | not identified, too small data set |
|
| Fíla et al. 2016 [ | TiO2–MOAC | × | × | 301 | 471 | 432 | 86.4:13:4:0.2 | 2 prolyl-directed (xxxxxxS*Pxxxxx; xxxxxxT*Pxxxxx) |
|
| Chao et al. 2016 [ | IMAC | × | 2257 | 4638 | 5292 | 81.5:14.5:4 | 8 prolyl-directed | |
|
| Vannini et al. 2019 [ | MOAC phosphoprotein enrichment + IMAC–Ti phosphopeptide enrichment | × | 711 | 1299 | 1572 | 90.3:9:0.7 | 6 prolyl-directed | |
Figure 1Comparison of pollen phosphoproteomes. (A)—GO biological processes enrichment analysis of phosphoproteins common to Arabidopsis and maize. The colours represent the false discovery rate of the enriched term, and the size of the circle represents the relative size of the GO term. (B)—A Treemap of enriched GO biological processes among phosphoproteins present in all three pollen samples (Arabidopsis, maize, and tobacco). The plots in (A,B) were rendered by Revigo [46].
Figure 2Comparison of pollen phosphoproteomes with root hair phosphoproteome. (A)—Venn diagram shows the overlap of several Arabidopsis homologue phosphoproteins discovered in pollen samples of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), maize (Zea mays), and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) together with soybean (Glycine max) root hair phosphoproteome. (B)—The biological processes (left) and molecular function (right) GO terms of phosphoproteins shared between the Arabidopsis pollen phosphoproteome and soybean root hair phosphoproteome. The colour represents false discovery rate of the enriched term. The plots were rendered by Revigo [46].