| Literature DB >> 34830066 |
Guifei Gu1,2, Sen Yang1,2, Xianhui Yin1,2, Youhua Long1,2, Yue Ma1,2, Rongyu Li1,2, Guoli Wang3.
Abstract
Bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) has led to considerable losses in all major kiwifruit-growing areas. There are no commercial products in the market to effectively control this disease. Therefore, the defense resistance of host plants is a prospective option. In our previous study, sulfur could improve the resistance of kiwifruit to Psa infection. However, the mechanisms of inducing resistance remain largely unclear. In this study, disease severity and protection efficiency were tested after applying sulfur, with different concentrations in the field. The results indicated that sulfur could reduce the disease index by 30.26 and 31.6 and recorded high protection efficiency of 76.67% and 77.00% after one and two years, respectively, when the concentration of induction treatments was 2.0 kg/m3. Ultrastructural changes in kiwifruit stems after induction were demonstrated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and the activities of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), peroxidase (POD) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO), and the accumulation of lignin were determined by biochemical analyses. Our results showed that the morphological characteristics of trichomes and lenticels of kiwifruit stem were in the best defensive state respectively when the sulfur concentration was 3.0 kg/m3 and 1.5 kg/m3. Meanwhile, in the range of 0.5 to 2.0 kg/m3, the sulfur could promote the chloroplast and mitochondria of kiwifruit stems infected with Psa to gradually return to health status, increasing the thickness of the cell wall. In addition, sulfur increased the activities of PAL, POD and PPO, and promoted the accumulation of lignin in kiwifruit stems. Moreover, the sulfur protection efficiency was positively correlated with PPO activity (p < 0.05) and lignin content (p < 0.01), which revealed that the synergistic effect of protective enzyme activity and the phenolic metabolism pathway was the physiological effect of sulfur-induced kiwifruit resistance to Psa. This evidence highlights the importance of lignin content in kiwifruit stems as a defense mechanism in sulfur-induced resistance. These results suggest that sulfur enhances kiwifruit canker resistance via an increase in phenolic components and morphology structure modification in the kiwifruit stems. Therefore, this study could provide insights into sulfur to control kiwifruit canker caused by Psa.Entities:
Keywords: Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae; induced resistance; morphological structure; phenolic components; sulfur
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34830066 PMCID: PMC8625120 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The effect of sulfur content on the disease index and protection efficiency of Psa_infected kiwifruit plants in fields. Vertical bars represented means (n = 3) ± standard deviations (SD). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05). The same is shown below.
Figure 2The distribution characteristics of trichomes in kiwifruit stems when sulfur contents are 0 to 3.0 kg/m3 (A), and the morphology of lenticels in kiwifruit stems when sulfur content is 0.5 to 1.5 kg/m3 (B).
Figure 3The effect of sulfur content on the ultrastructural morphology of kiwifruit stems where letters represent cytoderm (A) chloroplast ((B) M. mitochondrion; S. starch; GL. granum lamella; SL. stroma lamella; P. plastoglobulis.) and mitochondria ((C) M: mitochondria).
Figure 4Effect of sulfur treatment on phenolic components of kiwifruit stems. (A) (POD activity), (B) (PPO activity), (C) (PAL activity) and (D) (lignin content) of Psa_infected kiwifruit stems. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different treatments (p < 0.05).
Correlation coefficient between phenolic components in kiwifruit stems and protection efficiency.
| Correlation Coefficient | Protection Efficiency/% | POD Activity | PPO Activity | PAL Activity | Lignin Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protection efficiency/% | 1 | ||||
| POD activity/U·g−1 min−1 FW | 0.35 | 1 | |||
| PPO activity/U·g−1 min−1 FW | 0.71 * | 0.56 | 1 | ||
| PAL activity/U·g−1 min−1 FW | 0.51 | 0.6 | 0.83 * | 1 | |
| Lignin content/mg·mL−1 | 0.88 ** | 0.39 | 0.81 * | 0.52 | 1 |
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
The concentration of sulfur treatments.
| Number | Treatment |
|---|---|
| S0.5 | 0.5 kg/m3 Sulfur powder * + 10 kg Organic fertilizer |
| S1.0 | 1.0 kg/m3 Sulfur powder + 10 kg Organic fertilizer |
| S1.5 | 1.5 kg/m3 Sulfur powder + 10 kg Organic fertilizer |
| S2.0 | 2.0 kg/m3 Sulfur powder + 10 kg Organic fertilizer |
| S2.5 | 2.5 kg/m3 Sulfur powder + 10 kg Organic fertilizer |
| S3.0 | 3 kg/m3 Sulfur powder + 10 kg Organic fertilizer |
| S0 | 10 kg Organic fertilizer, CK |
* Note: The sulfur powder 0.5 kg was added to 1 m3 soil.