| Literature DB >> 34830022 |
Márcia Moraes Cascaes1, Odirleny Dos Santos Carneiro2, Lidiane Diniz do Nascimento3, Ângelo Antônio Barbosa de Moraes2, Mozaniel Santana de Oliveira3, Jorddy Neves Cruz3, Giselle Maria Skelding Pinheiro Guilhon1, Eloisa Helena de Aguiar Andrade1,3.
Abstract
The present work involves a systematic review of the chemical composition and biological effects of essential oils from the Annonaceae species collected in Brazil from 2011 to 2021. Annonaceae is one of the most important botanical families in Brazil, as some species have economic value in the market as local and international fruit. In addition, the species have useful applications in several areas-for instance, as raw materials for use in cosmetics and perfumery and as medicinal plants. In folk medicine, species such as Annona glabra L. and Xylopia sericea A. St.-Hil. are used to treat diseases such as rheumatism and malaria. The species of Annonaceae are an important source of essential oils and are rich in compounds belonging to the classes of mono and sesquiterpenes; of these compounds, α-pinene, β-pinene, limonene, (E)-caryophyllene, bicyclogermacrene, caryophyllene oxide, germacrene D, spathulenol, and β-elemene are the most abundant. The antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antileishmania, antioxidant, antiproliferative, cytotoxic, larvicidal, trypanocidal, and antimalarial activities of essential oils from the Annonaceae species in Brazil have been described in previous research, with the most studies on this topic being related to their antiproliferative or cytotoxic activities. In some studies, it was observed that the biological activity reported for these essential oils was superior to that of drugs available on the market, as is the case of the essential oil of the species Guatteria punctata (Aubl.) R. A. Howard., which showed a trypanocidal effect that was 34 times stronger than that of the reference drug benznidazol.Entities:
Keywords: Brazilian species; applications; essential oil; natural products
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34830022 PMCID: PMC8623146 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212140
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Ethnobotanical use of Annonaceae species occurring in Brazil.
| Scientific Name | Popular Name | Brazil Region | Part of the Plant Used | Medicinal Use | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marolo, araticum and araticum-liso | Southeast | Not specified | Parasites, ulcers, inflammatory processes, rheumatism and anthelmintic | [ | |
| - | Not specified | Fruits and seeds (infusion) | Diarrhea | [ | |
|
| Marolo | Cerrado | Seeds | Chronic diarrhea | [ |
| Araticum | Cerrado | Seeds, fruit and leaves | Chronic diarrhea, emollient and rheumatism | [ | |
| - | Not specified | Leaves | Rheumatism | [ | |
|
| Araticum and araticum do brejo | Northeast | Leaves | Rheumatism and | [ |
| Pinha-brava | Northeast | Not specified | Anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory | [ | |
| Graviola, araticum-grande and jaca-do-Pará | Northeast | Leaves | Snake bites and | [ | |
| - | Northeast | Leaves and bark | Diabetes, tumors, and inflammation | [ | |
| - | Not specified | Fruits and seeds | Ulcers | [ | |
| - | Northeast | Leaves | Stimulants, antispasmodics, sweats, anthelmintics, and insecticides | [ | |
|
| - | Not specified | Leaves | Boils and ulcers | [ |
|
| Pinha, ata and fruta-de-conde | Northeast | Seeds | Bath to remove lice | [ |
| Araticum, araticum-do-mato, cortiça and cortiça-amarela | Southeast | Leaves | Fever, cough, ulcers caused by syphilis, muscle spasms, and diarrhea | [ | |
| Pinha da Caatinga | Northeast | Roots and Leaves | Bee and snake stings, inflammation, heart pain, | [ | |
| Araticum-seco | Cerrado | Seeds | Parasiticidal | [ | |
|
| Araticum-seco | Southeast | Stem bark | Bath to remove lice | [ |
|
| Araticum seco | Cerrado | Branches with leaves | Rheumatism | [ |
| - | Not specified | Leaves | Anti-inflammatory | [ | |
|
| Pindaíba, beribá and pinhão | Not specified | Not | Anti-inflammatory, healing, and antimicrobial | [ |
| - | North | Seeds | Dyspepsia, stomach and uterine pain | [ | |
| Pinha-brava | Northeast | Stem bark | Stomachic | [ | |
| Pimenta-de-macaco | Cerrado | Fruits, leaves and stem bark | Digestive and anti- inflammatory | [ | |
|
| Pimenta-de-macaco, pimenta-de-negro | North | Not specified | Carminative and stimulating | [ |
| - | Not specified | Barks | Flu | [ | |
|
| Embira and semente-de-embira | Northeast | Seeds and fruits | Digestive | [ |
|
| Embira, embira-vermelha and pau carne | Northeast | Seeds | Bladder stimulant, triggering menstruation, fighting rheumatism, for halitosis, for tooth decay, and for intestinal diseases | [ |
| Meiú and pindaíba | Northeast | Leaves and flowers | Painful disorders, heart disease, and inflammatory conditions | [ | |
| Embiriba and pindaíba | Southeast | Seeds and fruits | Analgesic and anti-inflammatory | [ | |
|
| Pindaíba, pindaíba-vermelha and/or pimenta-de-macaco | Southeast | Not specified | Antimalarial | [ |
Chemical composition of essential oils from Annonaceae species occurring in Brazil.
| Species | Collection Place | Collection Date | Part of | Extraction Technique | Majority Constituents | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazonas | September 2009 | Leaves (0.52%) | HD | Guaiol, γ-eudesmol, β-eudesmol and α-eudesmol; M: 3.35%, SH: 13.56%; T: 75.69% | [ | |
| São Paulo | October 2009 | Leaves (0.05%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, γ-muurolene and δ-cadinene; M: 20.0%, S: 76.7%; O: 3.3%; T: 96.5% | [ | |
| Pará | March 2019 | Leaves (NI) | HD | Linalool, β-elemene, ( | [ | |
|
| Pará | September 2019 | Leaves (NI) | HD | [ | |
| Paraíba | August 2016 | Leaves (0.04%) | HD | α-Limonene, linalool, α-terpineol, ( | [ | |
| Sergipe | March 2010 | Leaves (0.2%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, ( | [ | |
|
| Sergipe | September 2010 | Leaves (0.3%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, ( | [ |
| Sergipe | March 2010 | Leaves (0.1%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, ( | [ | |
|
| Sergipe | September 2010 | Leaves (0.04%) | HD | δ-cadinene, ( | [ |
| Sergipe | September 2012 | Leaves | HD | ( | [ | |
| Mato Grosso do Sul | September 2010 | Leaves (0.17%) | HD | Hinesol, ( | [ | |
| Sergipe | April 2012 | Leaves (0.59%) | HD | α-Phellandrene, | [ | |
|
| Pernambuco | January 2012 | Leaves (0.09%) | HD | α-Pinene, limonene, spathulenol and caryophyllene oxide; T: | [ |
|
| Pernambuco | April 2015 | Leaves (NI) | HD | Limonene, ( | [ |
|
| Sergipe | April 2010 | Leaves (NI) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, spathulenol, α-phellandrene, α-pinene, ( | [ |
|
| Sergipe | March 2012 | Leaves (0.76%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, spathulenol and α-phellandrene; M: 34.0%; S: 65.1%; T: 99.1% | [ |
| Amazonas | June 2013 | Leaves (0.34%) | HD | α- | [ | |
|
| Rondônia | July 2018 | Aerial parts (0.12%) | HD | [ | |
| Amazonas | NI | Leaves (0.28%) | HD | ( | [ | |
|
| Amazonas | NI | Barks (0.27%) | HD | β-Selinene, α-selinene, β-bisabolene and δ-cadinene; T: 97.11% | [ |
|
| Amazonas | NI | Twigs (0.25%) | HD | β-Bisabolene, (2 | [ |
| Goiás | September 2014 | Flowers (NI) | HD | ( | [ | |
|
| Goiás | December 2014 | Fruits (NI) | HD | Germacrene D, germacrene B and spathulenol; M: 0.55%, S: 73.29% | [ |
|
| Goiás | March 2014 | Leaves (NI) | HD | Spathulenol, viridiflorol, (–)-isolongifolol acetate, and ( | [ |
| Minas Gerais | August 2016 | Stem bark (0.5%) | SD | Cyperene, α-gurjunene, bicyclogermacrene, 2,4,5-trimethoxystyrene and ( | [ | |
|
| Minas Gerais | August 2016 | Leaves (0.8%) | HD | Spathulenol and bicyclogermacrene | [ |
|
| Minas Gerais | August 2016 | Underground parts (wood) (0.7%) | HD | ( | [ |
|
| Minas Gerais | August 2016 | Underground parts (trunk) (0.9%) | HD | ( | [ |
| Minas Gerais | April 2012 | Twigs (0.4%) | HD | β-Elemene, β-caryophyllene, β-selinene, δ-cadinene, caryophyllene oxide, humulene II epoxide, β-eudesmol and cadina-1,4-dien-3-ol; HM: 4.0%, OM: 3.8%, SH: 40.0%, OS: 44.9%; T: 92.9% | [ | |
|
| Minas Gerais | NI | Leaves (0.4%) | HD | α-Selinene, aristolochene, ( | [ |
|
| São Paulo | March 2012 | Leaves (0.3%) | HD | [ | |
|
| Minas Gerais | NI | Barks (0.5%) | HD | β-elemene, caryophyllene oxide and β-selinene; HM: 1.6%, OM: 5.9%, SH: 31.9%, OS: 59.8%, H: 0.4%; T: 99.6% | [ |
| Rondônia | June 2018 | Aerial parts (0.11%) | HD | 4-Heptanol, α-thujene, α-copaene, ( | [ | |
| Sergipe | November 2013 | Leaves (0.13%) | HD | β-Bisabolene and elemicin; S: 96.0%; T: 96.0% | [ | |
| Amazonas | September 2012 | Leaves (0.2%) | HD | Cyclosativene, α-muurolene, spathulenol, caryophyllene oxide and humulene epoxide II; OM: 0.6%, SH: 20.8%, OS: 74.2%; T: 98.0% | [ | |
| Rondônia | July 2018 | Aerial parts (0.18%) | HD | ( | [ | |
| Rio de Janeiro | February 2011 | Aerial parts (0.1%) | HD | β-Pinene, | [ | |
|
| São Paulo | NI | Leaves (0.16%) | HD | ( | [ |
| Amazonas | September 2012 | Leaves (0.16%) | HD | Palustrol, spathulenol and caryophyllene oxide; SH: 6.4%, OS: 88.0%; O: 4.6%; T: 99.0% | [ | |
|
| Amazonas | January 2008 | Leaves (0.3%) | HD | Caryophyllene oxide; M: 0.1%, S: 91.2%; T: 91.3% | [ |
| São Paulo | NI | Leaves (0.11%) | HD | Spathulenol and caryophyllene oxide; SH: 0.5%, OS: 99.5%; T: 100.0% | [ | |
|
| São Paulo | NI | Leaves (0.21%) | HD | Spathulenol, caryophyllene oxide and β-copaen-α-ol; SH: 9.5%, OS: 91.5%, O: 0.5%; T: 100.0% | [ |
| Amazonas | NI | Leaves (1.17%) | HD | γ-Eudesmol, β-eudesmol and α-eudesmol; S: 93.0%; T: 93.0% | [ | |
|
| Amazonas | January 2008 | Leaves (0.6%) | HD | β-Eudesmol, γ-eudesmol e α-eudesmol; S: 98.2%; T: 98.2% | [ |
| Amazonas | July 2008 | Leaves (0.5%) | HD | ( | [ | |
| Rio de Janeiro | February 2011 | Aerial parts (0.1%) | HD | Spathulenol and caryophyllene oxide; OM: 6.94%, S: 3.35%, OS: 64.46%; T: 73.24% | [ | |
| Amazonas | September 2018 | Leaves (0.12%) | HD | δ-elemene, β-elemene, γ-muurolene, bicyclogermacrene and spathulenol; M: 1.41%, S: 87.30%; T: 88.71 | [ | |
| Sergipe | NI | Leaves (0.22%) | HD | Germacrene D, γ-amorphene and spathulenol; S: 88.4%; T: 88.4% | [ | |
|
| Sergipe | February 2012 | Leaves (0.28%) | HD | α-Pinene, β-pinene, ( | [ |
| Rondônia | September 2018 | Aerial parts (0.39%) | HD | ( | [ | |
| Rio de Janeiro | February 2011 | Aerial parts (0.1%) | HD | ( | [ | |
| Rio de Janeiro | February 2011 | Aerial parts (0.1%) | HD | [ | ||
| Amazonas | March 2015 | Leaves (0.18%) | HD | α-Copaene, ( | [ | |
|
| Amazonas | March 2015 | Trunk bark (0.37%) | HD | α-Gurjunene, | [ |
|
| Amazonas | March 2015 | Twigs (0.34%) | HD | α-Gurjunene, α- | [ |
| Acre | March 2017 | Leaves (0.24%) | HD | β-elemene, β-selinene and spathulenol; SH: 78.86%; OS: 12.45%; T: 91.31% | [ | |
| São Paulo | NI | Leaves | HD | Germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene and phytol; M: 0.39%; S: 76.0%; D: 7.3%; T: 84.0% | [ | |
|
| São Paulo | November 2011 | Fruits | HD | Neril, geranil formate, γ-muurolene, δ-cadinene, | [ |
| Mato Grosso do Sul | March 2005 | Leaves (0.15%) | HD | α-Copaene, β-elemene, ( | [ | |
| Amazonas | September 2012 | Leaves (0.25%) | HD | [ | ||
|
| Goiás | February 2015 | Leaves (0.1%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, spathulenol, globulol, | [ |
|
| Goiás | October 2014 | Flowers (0.2%) | HD | Bicyclogermacrene, 7- | [ |
| Paraíba | April 2010 | Leaves (NI) | HD | ( | [ | |
|
| Sergipe | April 2013 | Leaves (NI) | HD | ( | [ |
|
| Sergipe | July 2011 | Leaves (1.0%) | HD | ( | [ |
| Sergipe | NI | Leaves (1.4%) | HD | Germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, ( | [ | |
|
| Sergipe | November 2012 | Fresh fruits (0.4%) | HD | α-Pinene, β-pinene and limonene; M: 95.0%; S: 4.6%; T: 99.6% | [ |
|
| Sergipe | April 2013 | Leaves | HD | ( | [ |
|
| Sergipe | April 2010 | Leaves (>1.0%) | HD | γ-Muurolene, δ-cadinene, germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, α-copaene and ( | [ |
|
| Sergipe | March 2010 | Leaves (1.58%) | HD | Germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene and ( | [ |
|
| Sergipe | July 2010 | Leaves (>1.0%) | HD | Germacrene D, bicyclogermacrene, ( | [ |
| Paraíba | July 2012 | Fresh fruits (0.03%) | HD | α-Pinene, camphene, D-limonene, caryophyllene oxide and esclarene; T: 100.0% | [ | |
| Minas Gerais | September 2011 | Fruits (0.93%) | HD | Germacrene D, spathulenol and guaiol; M: 9.65%; S: 81.5%; D: 7.79%; O: 0.1%; T: 99.04% | [ | |
|
| Minas Gerais | July 2012 | Leaves (0.5%) | HD | α-Pinene, β-pinene, | [ |
SD: steam distillation; HD: hydrodistillation; HC: hydrocarbons; D: diterpenes; M: monoterpenes (hydrocarbons and oxygenates); S: sesquiterpenes (hydrocarbons and oxygenates); HM: hydrocarbon monoterpenes; OM: oxygenated monoterpenes; SH: sesquiterpene hydrocarbons; OS: oxygenated sesquiterpenes; O: other class; NI: not informed; T: total identified compounds.
Figure 1Distribution of studies with essential oils according to the genus of Annonaceae occurring in Brazil from 2011 to 2021.
Figure 2Percentage of studies conducted with essential oils from Annonaceae species collected in Brazil between the years 2011 and 2021.
Figure 3Structure of the major chemical constituents identified in the essential oils of Annonaceae species occurring in Brazil.
Figure 4Distribution of studies on the biological activities of essential oils from Annonaceae species occurring in Brazil.