Literature DB >> 34827053

A novel simulation model for penetrating keratoplasty.

Omar Solyman1, Kanwal S Matharu2, Yvonne Wang2, Mitchell P Weikert2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34827053      PMCID: PMC8837378          DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_489_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0301-4738            Impact factor:   1.848


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted postgraduate surgical training programs all over the world secondary to lockdowns, with reduction or suspension of nonelective surgeries. With the pandemic lasting longer than expected, simulation-based training has played a more pronounced role in residency and fellowship training programs.[1] Despite the introduction of lamellar and endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) remains a widely performed procedure[2] and hence a core training skill requirement for ophthalmology residents and fellows. Wet labs using animal[3] and cadaver[4] eyes are commonly used to practice PKP. However, animal and cadaver eyes may not be readily available to all trainees. Cost can be a barrier in some countries. In addition, animal and cadaver eyes require specific precautions for preservation and disposal. We describe a novel simulation model without these constraints that allows trainees to practice all of the surgical steps of PKP using affordable, commercially available materials [Supplemental video content]. The supplies of this simulation model consist of a transparent rubber toy (splat ball toy) as a donor button and an orthodontic pacifier as a recipient host tissue [Fig. 1].
Figure 1

A photograph featuring the materials used for this PKP simulation model. (a) medium-sized orthodontic pacifier (6–18 months), (b) clear rubber splat ball toy, (c) corneal trephine, (d) corneal punch

A photograph featuring the materials used for this PKP simulation model. (a) medium-sized orthodontic pacifier (6–18 months), (b) clear rubber splat ball toy, (c) corneal trephine, (d) corneal punch Advantages of this model include the availability and affordability of the materials (USD 5.00 per simulation with the materials used here). Additionally, compared to animal or cadaver eyes, the clarity of the material allows for better evaluation of the suture depth, position, orientation, and length. It also allows for repeated attempts at placing sutures without the tissue becoming hazy or friable. The model can be used more than once, as opposed to animal or cadaver eyes. This model requires no preservation and produces no biohazardous waste. The primary disadvantage is that the recipient silicone pacifier is thicker and stiffer than the human cornea; as such, trephination is less realistic. However, suturing of a PKP is the most important step to practice for a trainee, and this model closely replicates corneal tissue behavior. In summary, this cost-effective model provides a simulation of PKP and suturing training. The described PKP simulation model can assist ophthalmology and cornea specialist trainees to practice the steps of PKP in a safe environment. Trainees can develop the skills required for obtaining an optimum water-tight result with minimal astigmatism by practicing on this model as many times as needed until they acquire the skills needed to achieve proper position, tension, and length of the PKP sutures before they operate on patients’ corneas.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  4 in total

1.  Suture patterns and corneal graft rotation in the cadaver eye.

Authors:  Y K Au; S B Mahjoub; J C Hart
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1990-07

2.  Indications for penetrating keratoplasty and anterior lamellar keratoplasty during 2010-2017.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Sun; Hua-Lei Zhai; Jun Cheng; Qian-Qian Kong; Lin Cong; Lin Li; Wen-Pei Hao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Sheep practice eye for ophthalmic surgery training in skills laboratory.

Authors:  S Farzad Mohammadi; Arash Mazouri; Mahmoud Jabbarvand; Nazanin Rahman-A; Aeen Mohammadi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Wetlab training during COVID-19 era; an ophthalmology resident's perspective.

Authors:  Athira Devaraj; Aswathi Neena Satheesh; Gayathri J Panicker; Subashini Kaliyaperumal
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.848

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.