| Literature DB >> 34826997 |
Aditya S Kelkar1, Jai A Kelkar1, Sayali Tidke1, Aanchal Agarwal1, Mounika Bolisetty1, Shreekant Kelkar1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the influence of dimensions of macular telangiectasia (MacTel) on enface optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) on vision and clinical parameters in eyes with MacTel type 2.Entities:
Keywords: MacTel; Optical coherence tomography; telangiectasia
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34826997 PMCID: PMC8837333 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_315_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0301-4738 Impact factor: 1.848
Figure 1OCTA showing MacTel in grade 1(a), grade 2(b), grade 3 (c), and grade 4 (d) disease
Figure 2En face OCTA image of MacTel showing measurement of the vertical diameter using calipers
Comparison of demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics across four OCTA grades of macular telangiectasia
| Variable | Grade 1 ( | Grade 2 ( | Grade 3 ( | Grade 4 ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 65.3±4.3 | 64.1±7.9 | 62.1±7.6 | 64.5±9.6 | 0.58 |
| Gender (% women, n=39) | 6 (60%) | 8 (100%) | 15 (88%) | 10 (71%) | 0.12 |
| % with diabetes | 8 (80%) | 2 (25%) | 16 (94%) | 7 (50%) | 0.02 |
| % with hypertension | 7 (70%) | 5 (62%) | 11 (65%) | 9 (64%) | 0.98 |
| BCVA (logMAR) | 0.35±0.12 | 0.43±0.3 | 0.57±0.28 | 0.37±0.15 | 0.02 |
| Lens (% phakic) | 9 (75%) | 13 (56%) | 21 (60%) | 16 (57%) | 0.72 |
| Clinical Stage: 2 | 6 (50%) | 13 (57%) | 26 (74%) | 13 (46%) | 0.03 |
| Stage 3 | 2 (17%) | 1 (4%) | 0 | 2 (7%) | |
| Stage 4 | 4 (33%) | 9 (39%) | 9 (26%) | 9 (32%) | |
| Stage 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 (14%) | |
| Central macular thickness (µ) | 194.3±26.1 | 196.3±43.8 | 183.77±35.3 | 187.3±37.8 | 0.60 |
| Superficial plexus involvement (%) | 6 (50%) | 16 (70%) | 28 (80%) | 23 (82%) | 0.14 |
| Max vertical diameter of MacTel | 2049±984 | 2059±786 | 2090±698 | 1887±705 | 0.55 |
| Max horizontal diameter of MacTel | 1765±445 | 1963±665 | 1904±475 | 1849±601 | 0.89 |
| Vertical diameter of Largest cyst | 73.8±23.6 | 93.1±52.7 | 117.1±64.1 | 71.7±32.1 | 0.05 |
| Horizontal diameter of Largest cyst | 279.4±87.5 | 352.5±201 | 511.8±367 | 365.1±220 | 0.06 |
| Macular neovascularization | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 (35%) | <0.001 |
| Cyst location: No cyst | 2 (17%) | 4 (18%) | 8 (23%) | 8 (29%) | 0.009 |
| Subfoveal | 0 | 4 (18%) | 13 (37%) | 1 (3%) | |
| Juxtrafoveal | 10 (83%) | 15 (64%) | 14 (40%) | 19 (68%) |
Influence of the maximum vertical diameter of the macular telangiectasia on vision, macular thickness and clinical stage of disease
| Variable | Mean | Correlations | Univariate linear regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| β coefficient | 95% CI |
| ||
| BCVA | 0.46±0.26 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.05* | 0.005 to 0.08 | 0.03 |
| CMT | 202±132 | -0.07 | 0.48 | −5.21* | −22 to 12.5 | 0.56 |
| Clinical stage 2 ( | 1874±532 | -0.11 | 0.25 | Comparison group | ||
| Clinical stage 3 ( | 1654±595 | −120 | −134 to 150 | 0.25 | ||
| Clinical stage 4 ( | 1908±616 | −210 | −537 to 116 | 0.20 | ||
| Clinical stage 5 ( | 2169±208 | −59 | −818 to 699 | 0.87 | ||
*Change per 500 micron increment in vertical diameter of MacTel
Figure 3Eyes with progressively increasing vertical diameter of MacTel experienced. progressively worsening vision
Influence of the largest horizontal diameter of the macular telangiectasia on vision and macular thickness
| Variable | Mean | Correlations | Univariate linear regression | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| β coefficient | 95% CI |
| ||
| BCVA | 0.46+0.26 | 0.35 | 0.002 | 0.047* | 0.03 to 0.07 | <0.001 |
| CMT | 202+132 | 0.06 | 0.60 | 0.83* | −2.03 to 3.69 | 0.56 |
*Change per 500 micron increment in vertical diameter of MacTel
Figure 4Eyes with progressively increasing horizontal diameter of the degenerative cyst also experienced progressively worsening of vision
Univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis showing factors predicting best-corrected vision
| Variable | Interval | Univariate analysis | Multivariable analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| β coefficient | 95% CI | β coefficient | 95% CI | ||
| Age | 1 year increment | −0.005 | −0.012 to 0.0001 | - | - |
| Gender | Female vs. Male | 0.04 | −0.09 to 0.17 | - | - |
| Clinical stage | Vs. Stage 2 disease | 0.016 | −0.04 to 0.07 | - | - |
| OCTA grade | Vs. Grade 1 disease | 0.013 | −0.04 to0.06 | - | - |
| CMT | 50 µ increment | 0.02 | −0.004 to 0.03 | −0.07* | −0.013-−0.01 |
| Vertical diameter of MacTel | 500 µ increment | 0.05* | 0.005 to 0.08 | 0.055** | 0.03 to 0.08 |
| Horizontal cyst diameter | 100 µ increment | 0.046** | 0.03 to 0.06 | 0.044** | 0.03 to 0.06 |
| Cyst location | Juxtrafoveal vs. Subfoveal | −0.11** | −0.17-−0.04 | - | - |
*P<0.05, **P<0.001
Figure 5MacTel with pigment clump on fundus photograph (a), deep vascular plexus showing telangiectasia (b), ORCC showing neovascular-like tissue (c) likely to be a deeper extension of MacTel and structural OCT showing pigment clump (d) with back shadowing without any choroidal neovascularization, degenerative cysts or macular thinning