Literature DB >> 34825263

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measures are associated with prior low trauma fracture in men.

Kara B Anderson1, Monica C Tembo2, Sophia X Sui2, Natalie K Hyde2, Julie A Pasco2,3,4,5, Mark A Kotowicz2,4,5, Kara L Holloway-Kew2.   

Abstract

Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) assesses bone quantity and quality, complementary to current standard practice, and has potential to improve prediction of fracture risk. This study explored whether pQCT parameters were associated with prior fracture in men and found a number of parameters to be associated, particularly at the radius.
PURPOSE: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) provides information about bone structure and density complementary to dual x-ray absorptiometry. This study aimed to determine which pQCT parameters are associated with prior fracture.
METHODS: Participants were men (n = 508, age 33-96 years) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Parameters at 4% (n = 469) and 66% (n = 436) of radial length, and 4% (n = 449) and 66% (n = 437) of tibial length were acquired (pQCT XCT 2000, Stratec Medizintechnik, Pforzheim, Germany), and mean standardised. Low trauma prior fractures in adulthood (≥ age 20 years) were radiologically confirmed when possible. Cross-sectional associations between pQCT and fracture were tested using logistic regression adjusting for confounders.
RESULTS: Prior low trauma fractures were identified for 106 participants. Fracture was negatively associated with parameters at the 4% radius site: bone mass (adjusted OR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.52-0.86), total density (OR = 0.61; 95%CI = 0.47-0.78), trabecular density (OR = 0.62; 95%CI = 0.48-0.79) and cortical subdensity (OR = 0.61; 95%CI = 0.47-0.77). At the 66% radius site, fracture was associated with total density (OR = 0.69; 95%CI = 0.55-0.87) and cortical thickness (OR = 0.68; 95%CI = 0.54-0.86). Fracture was associated with the ratio of the cortical area at the 66% site to the total area at the 4% site (OR = 0.74; 95%CI = 0.58-0.94). Prior fracture was negatively associated with parameters at the 4% tibial site: total density (OR = 0.67; 95%CI = 0.52-0.86), trabecular density (OR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.50-0.82) and cortical subdensity (OR = 0.72; 95%CI = 0.56-0.92). Fracture was negatively associated with cortical density at the 66% site (OR = 0.74; 95%CI = 0.58-0.94), and the ratio of the cortical area at the 66% site to the total area at the 4% site (OR = 0.65; 95%CI = 0.46-0.91), but were attenuated in adjusted models. No other associations were identified.
CONCLUSION: Prior fracture was associated with parameters at both the radius and tibia. This study highlights key pQCT parameters that may aid in the prediction of fracture risk.
© 2021. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fracture; Healthy ageing; Men; Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34825263     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00996-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  15 in total

1.  Assessment of Bone and Muscle Measurements by Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  M Drey; M Henkel; S Petermeise; S Weiß; U Ferrari; M Rottenkolber; R Schmidmaier
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  The population burden of fractures originates in women with osteopenia, not osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Pasco; E Seeman; M J Henry; E N Merriman; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Fracture risk among older men: osteopenia and osteoporosis defined using cut-points derived from female versus male reference data.

Authors:  J A Pasco; S E Lane; S L Brennan; E N Timney; G Bucki-Smith; A G Dobbins; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Current understanding of osteoporosis according to the position of the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  Edward Czerwiński; Janusz E Badurski; Ewa Marcinowska-Suchowierska; Jolanta Osieleniec
Journal:  Ortop Traumatol Rehabil       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  Diagnostic devices for osteoporosis in the general population: A systematic review.

Authors:  M P Høiberg; K H Rubin; A P Hermann; K Brixen; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture with HR-pQCT.

Authors:  Kyle K Nishiyama; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.096

7.  Prediction of Fractures in Men Using Bone Microarchitectural Parameters Assessed by High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography-The Prospective STRAMBO Study.

Authors:  Pawel Szulc; Stéphanie Boutroy; Roland Chapurlat
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice.

Authors:  J A Kanis; D Hans; C Cooper; S Baim; J P Bilezikian; N Binkley; J A Cauley; J E Compston; B Dawson-Hughes; G El-Hajj Fuleihan; H Johansson; W D Leslie; E M Lewiecki; M Luckey; A Oden; S E Papapoulos; C Poiana; R Rizzoli; D A Wahl; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Peripheral quantitative computed tomography measures are associated with adult fracture risk: the Hertfordshire Cohort Study.

Authors:  E M Dennison; K A Jameson; M H Edwards; H J Denison; A Aihie Sayer; C Cooper
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Bone strength measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography and the risk of nonvertebral fractures: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  Yahtyng Sheu; Joseph M Zmuda; Robert M Boudreau; Moira A Petit; Kristine E Ensrud; Douglas C Bauer; Christopher L Gordon; Eric S Orwoll; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.