Literature DB >> 34824729

Knee Implant Identification by Fine-Tuning Deep Learning Models.

Sukkrit Sharma1, Vineet Batta2, Malathy Chidambaranathan1, Prabhakaran Mathialagan1, Gayathri Mani1, M Kiruthika2, Barun Datta3, Srinath Kamineni4, Guruva Reddy5, Suhas Masilamani6, Sandeep Vijayan7, Derek F Amanatullah8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identification of implant model from primary knee arthroplasty in pre-op planning of revision surgery is a challenging task with added delay. The direct impact of this inability to identify the implants in time leads to the increase in complexity in surgery. Deep learning in the medical field for diagnosis has shown promising results in getting better with every iteration. This study aims to find an optimal solution for the problem of identification of make and model of knee arthroplasty prosthesis using automated deep learning models.
METHODS: Deep learning algorithms were used to classify knee arthroplasty implant models. The training, validation and test comprised of 1078 radiographs with a total of 6 knee arthroplasty implant models with anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral views. The performance of the model was calculated using accuracy, sensitivity, and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), which were compared against multiple models trained for comparative in-depth analysis with saliency maps for visualization.
RESULTS: After training for a total of 30 epochs on all 6 models, the model performing the best obtained an accuracy of 96.38%, the sensitivity of 97.2% and AUC of 0.985 on an external testing dataset consisting of 162 radiographs. The best performing model correctly and uniquely identified the implants which could be visualized using saliency maps.
CONCLUSION: Deep learning models can be used to differentiate between 6 knee arthroplasty implant models. Saliency maps give us a better understanding of which regions the model is focusing on while predicting the results. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Image processing; Implant identification; Knee implant; Revision arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34824729      PMCID: PMC8586384          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00529-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  10 in total

1.  National projections of time, cost and failure in implantable device identification: Consideration of unique device identification use.

Authors:  Natalia Wilson; Jennifer Broatch; Megan Jehn; Charles Davis
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2015-06-06

2.  Revision total hip and knee arthroplasty implant identification: implications for use of Unique Device Identification 2012 AAHKS member survey results.

Authors:  Natalia A Wilson; Megan Jehn; Sally York; Charles M Davis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Software-based matching of x-ray images and 3D models of knee prostheses.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; Birte Wenk; Ralf Westphal; Friedrich Wahl; Stefan Budde; Peer Eysel; Johannes Oppermann
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.285

4.  Modified-BRISQUE as no reference image quality assessment for structural MR images.

Authors:  Li Sze Chow; Heshalini Rajagopal
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Artificial Intelligence to Identify Arthroplasty Implants From Radiographs of the Knee.

Authors:  Jaret M Karnuta; Bryan C Luu; Alexander L Roth; Heather S Haeberle; Antonia F Chen; Richard Iorio; Jonathan L Schaffer; Michael A Mont; Brendan M Patterson; Viktor E Krebs; Prem N Ramkumar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Is changing hospitals for revision total joint arthroplasty associated with more complications?

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Kevin J Bozic; Douglas E Padgett; Ting Jung Pan; Robert G Marx; Stephen Lyman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Detecting total hip replacement prosthesis design on plain radiographs using deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Alireza Borjali; Antonia F Chen; Orhun K Muratoglu; Mohammad A Morid; Kartik M Varadarajan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Machine learning-based identification of hip arthroplasty designs.

Authors:  Yang-Jae Kang; Jun-Il Yoo; Yong-Han Cha; Chan H Park; Jung-Taek Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Cardiac Rhythm Device Identification Using Neural Networks.

Authors:  James P Howard; Louis Fisher; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Daniel Keene; Ahran D Arnold; Yousif Ahmad; Christopher M Cook; James C Moon; Charlotte H Manisty; Zach I Whinnett; Graham D Cole; Daniel Rueckert; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-03-27

10.  Classifying shoulder implants in X-ray images using deep learning.

Authors:  Gregor Urban; Saman Porhemmat; Maya Stark; Brian Feeley; Kazunori Okada; Pierre Baldi
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 7.271

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.