Literature DB >> 34824717

Forgotten Joint Score Post Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Correlation with the New Knee Society Score.

Rajesh N Maniar1,2,3, Ankur Dhiman4, Parul R Maniar3, Pranav Bindal5, Anil Arekar6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is designed to asses patient recovery post Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in a new dimension. It assess the ability to forget the operated joint as artificial during activities of daily living. New Knee Society Score (NKSS) is developed to encompass objective and subjective outcome as well as an assessment of patient expectation and satisfaction. Our purpose was (1) to determine FJS at 1 year post TKA in Indian Patients, and (2) to assess convergent validity between FJS and the NKSS. We hypothesised that FJS should strongly correlate with the Satisfaction (SS) and Knee perception(KPS) sub-component of NKSS.
METHODS: We enrolled 181 patients who underwent primary TKA during an 8-month duration. They were prospectively followed up at 1-year review clinic when FJS and NKSS were administered. 169 patients completed the assessment forms and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. Statistical evaluation was done with Spearman correlation test.
RESULTS: Mean FJS at 1 year was 66.6 ± 25.9 with 14% ceiling and 1% floor effects. There was a mild to moderate correlation of FJS with NKSS (p < 0.001, r = 0.47) and its sub-scores (p < 0.001; r = 0.43 and r = 0.44). There was a weak correlation of FJS with NKSS sub-components of SS and KPS (p < 0.001; r = 0.37 and 0.25, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Mean FJS at 1 year post TKA showed convergent validity with NKSS; however, the correlation was not strong enough to use them interchangeably. Hypothesis that FJS should strongly correlate with the NKSS sub-components of satisfaction and joint perception was refuted. We conclude, FJS provides unique evaluation in recovery post TKA, different from NKSS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convergent validity; Forgotten Joint Score; Knee Arthroplasty; New Knee Society Score; Results

Year:  2021        PMID: 34824717      PMCID: PMC8586356          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00452-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  17 in total

1.  Deviations in femoral joint lines using calipered kinematically aligned TKA from virtually planned joint lines are small and do not affect clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Alexander J Nedopil; Stephen M Howell; Maury L Hull
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Johannes M Giesinger; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The validity and reliability of the modified forgotten joint score.

Authors:  Patrick G Robinson; Conor S Rankin; Jonathan Lavery; Iain Anthony; Mark Blyth; Bryn Jones
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  A Retrospective Comparison of a Medial Pivot and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty With Respect to Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes.

Authors:  David A Samy; Jesse I Wolfstadt; Iman Vaidee; David J Backstein
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Postoperative outcomes of total knee arthroplasty compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A matched comparison.

Authors:  Jason L Blevins; Kaitlin M Carroll; Joost A Burger; Andrew D Pearle; Mathias P Bostrom; Steven B Haas; Thomas P Sculco; Seth A Jerabek; David J Mayman
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Normative Values for the Forgotten Joint Score-12 for the US General Population.

Authors:  Johannes M Giesinger; Henrik Behrend; David F Hamilton; Markus S Kuster; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Sagittal Stability and Implant Design Affect Patient Reported Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher W Jones; Hans Jacobs; Sarah Shumborski; Simon Talbot; Andrew Redgment; Roger Brighton; William L Walter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Joint Perception After Total Hip Arthroplasty and the Forgotten Joint.

Authors:  Benjamin Puliero; William G Blakeney; Yann Beaulieu; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Forgotten Joint Score Thresholds for Forgotten Joint Status and Patient Satisfaction after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Chinese Patients.

Authors:  Zhaolun Wang; Wang Deng; Hongyi Shao; Yixin Zhou; Hua Li
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Uncemented vs Cemented Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 30.

Authors:  K Keely Boyle; Scott R Nodzo; Joseph T Ferraro; David J Augenblick; Sonja Pavlesen; Matthew J Phillips
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.