| Literature DB >> 34823523 |
Ying Dong1, Herong Huang2, Yan Deng3, Yanchun Xu3, Mengni Chen3, Yan Liu3, Canglin Zhang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the incidence rate of vivax malaria recurrence still had 3.1% in Yunnan Province population after eradication therapy using primaquine (PQ). In order to understand the specific failure reasons for preventing vivax malaria relapses, a preliminary exploration on the CYP2D6 enzyme activity was carried out in the vivax malaria patients in Yunnan Province population by analysing mutational polymorphism in the coding region of CYP2D6 gene.Entities:
Keywords: CYP2D6; Enzyme activity; Genotype; Prediction; Vivax malaria patient; Yunnan Province
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34823523 PMCID: PMC8620920 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03988-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Information of 320 vivax malaria cases for amplification of CYP2D6 gene CDSs
| Variable | Total (n, F%) | SR group (n, F%) | NR group (n, F%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 320 (100.0) | 63 (19.7) | 257 (80.3) |
| 1. Gender | |||
| Male | 233 (72.8) | 46 (73.0) | 187 (72.8) |
| Female | 87 (27.2) | 17 (27.0) | 70 (27.2) |
| 2. Age (in years) | |||
| 0–4 | 6 (1.9) | 2 (3.2) | 4 (1.6) |
| 5–20 | 36 (11.3) | 3 (4.8) | 33 (12.8) |
| 21–60 | 260 (81.2) | 54 (85.7) | 206 (80.2) |
| Above 60 | 18 (5.6) | 4 (6.3) | 14 (5.4) |
| 3. Malaria relapse | |||
| 1 episode | 60 (18.8) | 60 (95.2) | – |
| 2 episodes | 2 (0.7) | 2 (3.2) | |
| 3 episodes | 1 (0.3) | 1 (1.6) | – |
| 4. Infection source a | |||
| Myanmar | 315 (98.4) | 60 (95.2) | 255 (99.2) |
| Africa | 3 (0.9) | 1 (1.6) | 2 (0.8) |
| Yunnan indigenous | 2 (0.7) | 2 (3.2) | – |
| 5. Days of recurrence (d) | |||
| Shortest | – | 29 | – |
| Median | 171 | ||
| Longest | – | 1605 | – |
n number of cases, F Frequency
aIdentified by epidemiological investigation
The polymorphism and diploid of CDS mutation loci in CYP2D6 gene of vivax malaria cases in Yunnan Province
| Loci | SNP IDa | Codon change | Amino acid change | Frequency b | Diploid | Different type of cases | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. loci | NMHO c | MHE e | MHO f | No. SR(TPR)g | No. NR | ||||||
| c.31 | rs769258 | GTG > | V11M | 0.002 | 1 | 319 (99.7) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0.197 |
| c.100 | rs1065852 | CCA > | P34S | 0.527 | 337 | 87 (27.2) | 129 (40.3) | 104 (32.5) | 43 (68.3) | 190 (73.9) | 0.364 |
| c.271 | rs28371703 | CTG > | L91M | 0.006 | 4 | 318 (99.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.038 h |
| CTG > | L91L | 0.003 | 2 | 319 (99.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.4) | 1 | ||
| c.281 | rs28371704 | CAC > C | H94R | 0.006 | 4 | 318 (99.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.038 h |
| c.294 | rs28371705 | ACC > AC | T98T | 0.006 | 4 | 318 (99.4) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.6) | 2 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.038 h |
| c.297 | rs200269944 | GCC > GC | A99A | 0.002 | 1 | 319 (99.7) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.197 |
| c.336 | rs1081003 | TTC > TT | F112F | 0.552 | 353 | 93 (29.1) | 101 (31.5) | 126 (39.4) | 39 (61.9) | 188 (73.2) | 0.078 |
| c.408 | rs1058164 | GTG > GT | V136V | 0.698 | 447 | 54 (16.9) | 85 (26.6) | 181 (56.5) | 58 (92.1) | 208 (80.9) | 0.035 h |
| c.505 | rs5030865 | GGT > | G169S | 0.003 | 2 | 318 (99.4) | 2 (0.6) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (3.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0.038 h |
| c.801 | rs28371718 | CCC > CCA | P267P | 0.002 | 1 | 319 (99.7) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.4) | 1 |
| c.886 | rs16947 | CGC > | R296C | 0.178 | 114 | 220 (68.8) | 86 (26.9) | 14 (4.4) | 24 (38.1) | 76 (29.6) | 0.191 |
| c.1457 | rs1135840 | AGC > A | S486T | 0.703 | 450 | 46 (14.4) | 98 (30.6) | 176 (55.0) | 60 (95.2) | 214 (83.3) | 0.015 h |
aThe SNP ID was determined by searching on NCBI platform
bThe denominator was 640, which is the total number of 320 maternal CDS chains and 320 paternal CDS chains
cConstituent ratio, the denominator was 320
dNMHO not mutation homozygote
eMHE mutation heterozygote
fMHO mutation homozygote
gTPR test positive rate
hChi-square test (significant level at P < 0.05)
Fig. 1Waterfall plotting of mutation loci in different haplotypes (allelic form) in the CDS chains of CYP2D6 gene
Prediction of CYP2D6 enzyme activity based on genotyping of CDS chain of vivax malaria patients in Yunnan Province
| Genotypes | No | Genotype mothed | PROVEAN mothed | Different type of cases | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | Classify | Score | Cutoff | Function | No. SR (TPR)b | No. NR (TPR)b | |||
| *1/*1 | 43 (13.4) | 2.0 | NM | 2.000 | − 2.5 | NT | 2 (3.2) | 41 (16.0) | 0.008c |
| *2/*2 | 10 (3.1) | 2.0 | NM | − 0.887 | − 2.5 | NT | 4 (6.3) | 6 (2.3) | 0.216 |
| *1/*2 | 22 (6.9) | 2.0 | NM | − 0.773 | − 2.5 | NT | 7 (11.1) | 15 (5.8) | 0.228 |
| *2/*10 | 32 (10.0) | 1.25 | NM | − 1.568 | − 2.5 | NT | 2 (3.2) | 30 (11.7) | 0.044c |
| *1/*10 | 58 (18.1) | 1.25 | NM | − 2.341 | − 2.5 | NT | 6 (9.5) | 52 (20.2) | 0.048 c |
| *10/*10 | 86 (26.9) | 0.50 | IM | − 1.671 | − 2.5 | NT | 18 (28.6) | 68 (26.5) | 0.735 |
| *10/*39 | 9 (2.8) | 0.75 | IM | − 2.666 | − 2.5 | DT | 6 (9.5) | 3 (1.2) | 0.002c |
| *39/*39 | 3 (0.9) | 1.0 | IM | 1.350 | − 2.5 | NT | 2 (3.2) | 1 (0.4) | 0.100 |
| *2/*39 | 5 (1.6) | 1.50 | NM | − 1.098 | − 2.5 | NT | 3 (4.8) | 2 (0.8) | 0.054 |
| *4/*4 | 1 (0.3) | 0 | PM | − 9.431 | − 2.5 | DT | 1 (1.6) | 0 (0.0) | 0.197 |
| Others d | 51 (15.9) | – | – | – | – | – | 12 (19.0) | 39 (15.2) | 0.452 |
| Total | 320 | 63 | 257 | ||||||
aCR is acronym for constituent ratio
bTPR is acronym for Test positive rate
cChi-square test (significant level at P < 0.05)
dThe diploids with at least one undocumented allele (*m, *n, *o, *p, *q,*r, *s,*t, *u, *v, *w and *x)