| Literature DB >> 34823225 |
Kazuya Taira1, Rikuya Hosokawa1, Tomoya Itatani2, Sumio Fujita3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of suicides in Japan increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Predicting the number of suicides is important to take timely preventive measures.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Japan; behavior; information seeking; infoveillance; internet; internet search engine; loneliness; mental health; model; prediction; query; suicide; suicide-related terms; time series; time series analysis; trend; vector autoregression model
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34823225 PMCID: PMC8647973 DOI: 10.2196/34016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill ISSN: 2369-2960
Results of the augmented Dickey-Fuller test (original series).
|
| Male | Female | ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Trend | Drift | Trend | Drift | ||||||||||||||||
|
| Lag | Tau3 | Lag | Tau2 | Lag | Tau 3 | Lag | Tau 2 | ||||||||||||
| The number of suicides | 1 | −3.29a | 1 | −2.74b | 1 | −2.34 | 1 | −2.38 | ||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| “Abuse” | 1 | −5.80c | 1 | −5.86d | 1 | −5.98c | 1 | −5.94d | |||||||||||
|
| “Divorce” | 1 | −2.34 | 1 | −2.62b | 1 | −2.96 | 1 | −3.02e | |||||||||||
|
| “No money” | 1 | −4.29c | 1 | −3.16e | 1 | −3.34a | 1 | −2.32 | |||||||||||
|
| “Work, don’t want to go” | 1 | −3.92f | 1 | −3.82d | 1 | −3.65c | 1 | −3.25e | |||||||||||
|
| “Company, want to quit” | 1 | −4.53c | 1 | −2.35 | 1 | −4.46c | 1 | −1.85 | |||||||||||
aTrend model critical value 10%=–3.15.
bDrift model critical value 10%=–2.58.
cTrend model critical value 1%=–4.04.
dDrift model critical value 1%=–3.51.
eDrift model critical value 5%=–2.89.
fTrend model critical value 5%=–3.45.
Results of the augmented Dickey-Fuller test (first-order difference series).
|
| Male | Female | |||||||||||||||
|
| Trend | Drift | Trend | Drift | |||||||||||||
|
| Lag | Tau3 | Lag | Tau2 | Lag | Tau 3 | Lag | Tau 2 | |||||||||
| The number of suicides | 1 | –5.91a | 1 | –5.94b | 1 | –3.81c | 1 | –3.90b | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| “Abuse” | 1 | –9.24a | 1 | –9.33b | 1 | –9.42a | 1 | –9.50b | ||||||||
|
| “Divorce” | 1 | –5.38a | 1 | –5.28b | 1 | –5.87a | 1 | –5.82b | ||||||||
|
| “No money” | 1 | –7.73a | 1 | –7.80b | 1 | –6.72a | 1 | –6.77b | ||||||||
|
| “Work, don’t want to go” | 1 | –7.64a | 1 | –7.60b | 1 | –7.01a | 1 | –6.96b | ||||||||
|
| “Company, want to quit” | 1 | –7.12a | 1 | –7.19b | 1 | –7.71a | 1 | –7.71b | ||||||||
aTrend model critical value 1%=–4.04.
bDrift model critical value 1%=–3.51.
cTrend model critical value 5%=–3.45.
Results of Johansen (cointegration) tests, including the trend term and a seasonal dummy variable, between the number of suicides and each search query.
| Variables and H0 | Lags | Test statistics | Critical values | |||||||||
|
|
|
| 10% | 5% | 1% | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 10.82a | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 41.21b | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 4.65 | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 26.01c | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 5.99 | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 34.66b | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 12.52c | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 35.49b | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 2 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 12.08a | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 29.45c | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 15.63c | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 36.50b | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 4.23 | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 25.09c | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 3.07 | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 32.00b | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 5 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 9.72 | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 35.27b | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
|
|
| 3 |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| r≤1 |
| 12.99c | 10.49 | 12.25 | 16.26 | |||||
|
|
| r=0 |
| 30.35c | 22.76 | 25.32 | 30.45 | |||||
a>1%.
b>10%
c>5%.
Figure 1Changes in the number of suicides and predicted values of vector autoregression models using each search query (men). ARCH-LM: autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity Lagrangian multiplier.
Figure 2Changes in the number of suicides and predicted values of vector autoregressive models using each search query (women). ARCH-LM: autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity Lagrangian multiplier.
Result of Granger causality test of each search query for the number of suicides.
|
| Male | Female | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| “Abuse” | 0.238 (102) | .79 | 0.237 (104) | .76 | |
|
| “Divorce” | 3.290 (104) | .04a | 3.229 (104) | .04a | |
|
| “No money” | 0.752 (110) | .39 | 0.736 (62) | .68 | |
|
| “Work, don’t want to go” | 0.840 (74) | .56 | 1.641 (104) | .20 | |
|
| “Company, want to quit” | 3.760 (110) | .06 | 1.028 (98) | .38 | |
aP<.05.