Literature DB >> 3482231

A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques.

E E Ruiz-Hubard, J L Gutmann, M J Wagner.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1987        PMID： 3482231     DOI： 10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80004-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN： 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of apical debris extrusion and intracanal debris in the apical third, using hand instrumentation and three rotary instrumentation systems.

Authors:  Sowmya H K; Subhash T S; Beena Rani Goel; Nandini T N; Shilpa H Bhandi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-02-03

2.  Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of bacteria using hand and rotary systems : An in vitro study.

Authors:  Sheetal B Ghivari; Girish C Kubasad; Preethi Deshpande
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2012-01

3.  Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Roopadevi Garlapati; Bhuvan Shome Venigalla; Jayaprakash D Patil; Rvsc Raju; Chintamani Rammohan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-07

4.  Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process.

Authors:  Ersan Çiçek; Mustafa Murat Koçak; Sibel Koçak; Baran Can Sağlam
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

5.  In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.

Authors:  Sonal Soi; Suman Yadav; Sumeet Sharma; Mohit Sharma
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-09-16

6.  Comparison of apical and coronal extrusions using reciprocating and rotary instrumentation systems.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Min Chen; Feng Qiao; Ligeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  A Comparative Study on the Amount of Extruded Material from the Apical Foramen with NiTi Rotary and Stainless Steel Hand Instruments.

Authors:  Shahrzad Nazari; Farshid Mirmotalebi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2006-07-01

8.  Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems.

Authors:  Jayaprada Reddy Surakanti; Ravi Chandra Polavarapu Venkata; Hari Kumar Vemisetty; Ram Kiran Dandolu; Nagendra Krishna Muppalla Jaya; Shirisha Thota
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2014-03

9.  Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris with V-Taper, ProTaper Next, and the Self-adjusting File systems.

Authors:  Nishant K Vyavahare; Srinidhi Surya Raghavendra; Niranjan N Desai
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 May-Jun

10.  Comparison of apically extruded debris associated with several nickel-titanium systems after determining working length by apex locator.

Authors:  Ersan Çiçek; Oguzhan Akkocan; Fatma Furuncuoglu
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.