Literature DB >> 34820715

Concordance of the histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis and its distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy specimens: an interobserver agreement study.

Kenji Notohara1, Terumi Kamisawa2, Toru Furukawa3, Noriyoshi Fukushima4, Takeshi Uehara5, Satomi Kasashima6, Eisuke Iwasaki7, Atsushi Kanno8,9, Atsuhiro Kawashima10, Kensuke Kubota11, Yasuhiro Kuraishi12, Masayo Motoya13, Itaru Naitoh14, Takayoshi Nishino15, Junichi Sakagami16,17, Kyoko Shimizu18, Teruko Tomono19, Shinichi Aishima20, Yuki Fukumura21, Kenichi Hirabayashi22, Motohiro Kojima23, Tomoko Mitsuhashi24, Yoshiki Naito25, Nobuyuki Ohike26,27, Takuma Tajiri28, Hiroshi Yamaguchi29, Hideyo Fujiwara30, Emi Ibuki31, Shota Kobayashi5, Masashi Miyaoka22, Mamiko Nagase32, Junko Nakashima33, Masamichi Nakayama34, Shinsuke Oda35, Daiki Taniyama36, Sho Tsuyama21, Syunsuke Watanabe37, Tsukasa Ikeura38, Shigeyuki Kawa39, Kazuichi Okazaki40.   

Abstract

The histological diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) based on the findings obtained by an endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is feasible, but the diagnostic consistency of this method has not been confirmed. We determined the interobserver agreement among 20 pathologists regarding the diagnosis of type 1 AIP, including the distinction from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) using large tissue samples obtained by EUS-FNB. After guidance for diagnosing AIP with biopsy tissues was provided, a round 2 was performed. The median sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PDAC vs. non-neoplastic diseases were 95.2% and 100%, respectively. In groups of specialists (n = 7) and the generalists (n = 13), Fleiss' к-values increased from 0.886 to 0.958 and from 0.750 to 0.816 in round 2. The concordance was fair or moderate for obliterative phlebitis and storiform fibrosis but slight for ductal lesion of type 1 AIP. Discordant results were due to ambiguous findings and biopsy tissue limitations. Among the specialists, the ratio of cases with perfect agreement regarding the presence of storiform fibrosis increased in round 2, but agreement regarding obliterative phlebitis or ductal lesions was not improved. Although the histological definite diagnosis of type 1 AIP was achieved by most observers in > 60% of the cases, the confidence levels varied. Because some ambiguities exist, the histological diagnostic levels based on the diagnostic criteria of type 1 AIP should not be taken for granted. Guidance is effective for improving accurate PDAC diagnoses (notably by recognizing acinar-ductal metaplasia) and for evaluating storiform fibrosis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autoimmune pancreatitis; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy; Observer variation; Pancreatic carcinoma; Pathologist

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34820715     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03236-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  32 in total

1.  Clinical features and relapse rates after surgery in type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis differ from type 2: a study of 114 surgically treated European patients.

Authors:  Sönke Detlefsen; Giuseppe Zamboni; Luca Frulloni; Bernd Feyerabend; Felix Braun; Oke Gerke; Anna Melissa Schlitter; Irene Esposito; Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.996

2.  Recommendations for the nomenclature of IgG4-related disease and its individual organ system manifestations.

Authors:  John H Stone; Arezou Khosroshahi; Vikram Deshpande; John K C Chan; J Godfrey Heathcote; Rob Aalberse; Atsushi Azumi; Donald B Bloch; William R Brugge; Mollie N Carruthers; Wah Cheuk; Lynn Cornell; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Judith A Ferry; David Forcione; Günter Klöppel; Daniel L Hamilos; Terumi Kamisawa; Satomi Kasashima; Shigeyuki Kawa; Mitsuhiro Kawano; Yasufumi Masaki; Kenji Notohara; Kazuichi Okazaki; Ji Kon Ryu; Takako Saeki; Dushyant Sahani; Yasuharu Sato; Thomas Smyrk; James R Stone; Masayuki Takahira; Hisanori Umehara; George Webster; Motohisa Yamamoto; Eunhee Yi; Tadashi Yoshino; Giuseppe Zamboni; Yoh Zen; Suresh Chari
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-10

3.  Differences in clinical profile and relapse rate of type 1 versus type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis.

Authors:  Raghuwansh P Sah; Suresh T Chari; Rahul Pannala; Aravind Sugumar; Jonathan E Clain; Michael J Levy; Randall K Pearson; Thomas C Smyrk; Bret T Petersen; Mark D Topazian; Naoki Takahashi; Michael B Farnell; Santhi S Vege
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Clinical profile of autoimmune pancreatitis and its histological subtypes: an international multicenter survey.

Authors:  Terumi Kamisawa; Suresh T Chari; Samuel A Giday; Myung-Hwan Kim; Jae Bock Chung; Kyu Taek Lee; Jens Werner; Frank Bergmann; Markus M Lerch; Julia Mayerle; Tilman Pickartz; Matthias Lohr; Alexander Schneider; Luca Frulloni; George J M Webster; D Nageshwar Reddy; Wei-Chih Liao; Hsiu-Po Wang; Kazuichi Okazaki; Tooru Shimosegawa; Guenter Kloeppel; Vay Liang W Go
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.327

5.  International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology.

Authors:  Tooru Shimosegawa; Suresh T Chari; Luca Frulloni; Terumi Kamisawa; Shigeyuki Kawa; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Myung-Hwan Kim; Günter Klöppel; Markus M Lerch; Matthias Löhr; Kenji Notohara; Kazuichi Okazaki; Alexander Schneider; Lizhi Zhang
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Subclassification of autoimmune pancreatitis: a histologic classification with clinical significance.

Authors:  Vikram Deshpande; Rajib Gupta; Nisha Sainani; Dushyant V Sahani; Renu Virk; Cristina Ferrone; Arezou Khosroshahi; John H Stone; Gregory Y Lauwers
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  Histopathologic and clinical subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis: the Honolulu consensus document.

Authors:  Suresh T Chari; Guenter Kloeppel; Lizhi Zhang; Kenji Notohara; Markus M Lerch; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Clinical profiles and outcomes in idiopathic duct-centric chronic pancreatitis (type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis): the Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  Phil A Hart; Michael J Levy; Thomas C Smyrk; Naoki Takahashi; Barham K Abu Dayyeh; Jonathan E Clain; Ferga C Gleeson; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Mark D Topazian; Santhi S Vege; Lizhi Zhang; Suresh T Chari
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Histopathological features of diagnostic and clinical relevance in autoimmune pancreatitis: a study on 53 resection specimens and 9 biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Giuseppe Zamboni; Jutta Lüttges; Paola Capelli; Luca Frulloni; Giorgio Cavallini; Paolo Pederzoli; Alexander Leins; Daniel Longnecker; Günter Klöppel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-10-27       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  Clinicopathological Features of Type 2 Autoimmune Pancreatitis in Japan: Results of a Multicenter Survey.

Authors:  Kenji Notohara; Isao Nishimori; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuichi Okazaki; Tetsuhide Ito; Shigeyuki Kawa; Shinichi Egawa; Yasuyuki Kihara; Atsushi Kanno; Atsushi Masamune; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.327

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biopsy diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: Does it bring a conclusion or confusion?

Authors:  Kenji Notohara
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2021-12-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.