Ghassan El Sayed1, Levente Frim2, Jamie Franklin3, Raymond McCrudden1, Charles Gordon1, Safa Al-Shamma1, Szabolcs Kiss2, Péter Hegyi2, Bálint Erőss2, Péter Jenő Hegyi4. 1. The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, University Hospital Dorset, Bournemouth, UK. 2. Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. 3. The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, University Hospital Dorset, Institute of Medical Imaging and Visualisation, Bournemouth, UKLevente Frim. 4. Institute for Translational Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti Street 12, Pecs H-7624, Hungary.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Insulinoma is the most common neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas, characterised by hypoglycaemic symptoms. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) and ethanol ablation (EUS-EA) are novel methods for treating insulinoma.We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided ablation techniques for pancreatic insulinomas. METHODS: We systematically searched for articles detailing EUS-guided ablations of insulinomas. We performed a qualitative analysis and summarised data on the efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA techniques. RESULTS: In total, we identified 35 case reports and case series describing 75 patients with insulinomas treatment with EUS-guided ablation. Twenty-seven patients were treated with EUS-RFA, 47 patients with EUS-EA, and 1 patient received EUS-EA and EUS-RFA in the same session. In total, 84 insulinomas were ablated (EUS-RFA: 31, EUS-EA: 53). Most insulinomas were in the head of the pancreas (40%). The clinical success rate for EUS-guided ablation techniques was 98.5%. The median glucose level was 1.95 (Q1-Q3: 1.69-2.13) mmol/L before ablation compared to 6.20 (Q1-Q3: 5.30-7.05) mmol/L after treatment. The median insulin and C-peptide levels before and after RFA/EA were 230 (Q1-Q2: 120-257) pmol/L and 41 (Q1-Q2 35-42) pmol/L; 2077 (Q1-Q2 1644-2459) pmol/L and 819 (Q1-Q2 696-1072) pmol/L, respectively. There were eleven adverse events: seven abdominal pain, two mild acute pancreatitis, one necrotising acute pancreatitis and one local hematoma. All patients recovered, and there were no periprocedural deaths. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided ablation of insulinoma seems to be a safe and effective treatment and is an alternative to surgical resection in selected cases.
BACKGROUND: Insulinoma is the most common neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas, characterised by hypoglycaemic symptoms. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) and ethanol ablation (EUS-EA) are novel methods for treating insulinoma.We aimed to perform a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-guided ablation techniques for pancreatic insulinomas. METHODS: We systematically searched for articles detailing EUS-guided ablations of insulinomas. We performed a qualitative analysis and summarised data on the efficacy and safety of EUS-RFA and EUS-EA techniques. RESULTS: In total, we identified 35 case reports and case series describing 75 patients with insulinomas treatment with EUS-guided ablation. Twenty-seven patients were treated with EUS-RFA, 47 patients with EUS-EA, and 1 patient received EUS-EA and EUS-RFA in the same session. In total, 84 insulinomas were ablated (EUS-RFA: 31, EUS-EA: 53). Most insulinomas were in the head of the pancreas (40%). The clinical success rate for EUS-guided ablation techniques was 98.5%. The median glucose level was 1.95 (Q1-Q3: 1.69-2.13) mmol/L before ablation compared to 6.20 (Q1-Q3: 5.30-7.05) mmol/L after treatment. The median insulin and C-peptide levels before and after RFA/EA were 230 (Q1-Q2: 120-257) pmol/L and 41 (Q1-Q2 35-42) pmol/L; 2077 (Q1-Q2 1644-2459) pmol/L and 819 (Q1-Q2 696-1072) pmol/L, respectively. There were eleven adverse events: seven abdominal pain, two mild acute pancreatitis, one necrotising acute pancreatitis and one local hematoma. All patients recovered, and there were no periprocedural deaths. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided ablation of insulinoma seems to be a safe and effective treatment and is an alternative to surgical resection in selected cases.
Authors: Kai Matthes; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Dushyant V Sahani; Nagaraj Holalkere; William R Brugge Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 9.427