Literature DB >> 34819362

G protein signaling-biased mu opioid receptor agonists that produce sustained G protein activation are noncompetitive agonists.

Edward L Stahl1, Cullen L Schmid1, Agnes Acevedo-Canabal1, Cai Read1, Travis W Grim1, Nicole M Kennedy1, Thomas D Bannister1, Laura M Bohn2.   

Abstract

The ability of a ligand to preferentially promote engagement of one signaling pathway over another downstream of GPCR activation has been referred to as signaling bias, functional selectivity, and biased agonism. The presentation of ligand bias reflects selectivity between active states of the receptor, which may result in the display of preferential engagement with one signaling pathway over another. In this study, we provide evidence that the G protein-biased mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonists SR-17018 and SR-14968 stabilize the MOR in a wash-resistant yet antagonist-reversible G protein-signaling state. Furthermore, we demonstrate that these structurally related biased agonists are noncompetitive for radiolabeled MOR antagonist binding, and while they stimulate G protein signaling in mouse brains, partial agonists of this class do not compete with full agonist activation. Importantly, opioid antagonists can readily reverse their effects in vivo. Given that chronic treatment with SR-17018 does not lead to tolerance in several mouse pain models, this feature may be desirable for the development of long-lasting opioid analgesics that remain sensitive to antagonist reversal of respiratory suppression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allostery; biased agonism; efficacy; naloxone; tolerance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34819362      PMCID: PMC8640941          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2102178118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  48 in total

1.  mu-Opioid receptor-stimulated guanosine-5'-O-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate binding in rat thalamus and cultured cell lines: signal transduction mechanisms underlying agonist efficacy.

Authors:  D E Selley; L J Sim; R Xiao; Q Liu; S R Childers
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.436

2.  Estimation of the affinities of allosteric ligands using radioligand binding and pharmacological null methods.

Authors:  F J Ehlert
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Stimulus bias provides evidence for conformational constraints in the structure of a G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Karen J Gregory; Patrick M Sexton; Andrew B Tobin; Arthur Christopoulos
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Opiate agonists and antagonists discriminated by receptor binding in brain.

Authors:  C B Pert; G Pasternak; S H Snyder
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Mu Opioid Pharmacology: 40 Years to the Promised Land.

Authors:  Gavril W Pasternak
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-15

6.  The role of beta-arrestin2 in the severity of antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence induced by different opioid pain therapeutics.

Authors:  Kirsten M Raehal; Laura M Bohn
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.250

7.  Sodium modulates opioid receptors through a membrane component different from G-proteins. Demonstration by target size analysis.

Authors:  S Ott; T Costa; A Herz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-07-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Opiate-dependent modulation of adenylate cyclase.

Authors:  S K Sharma; W A Klee; M Nirenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Therapeutic potential of β-arrestin- and G protein-biased agonists.

Authors:  Erin J Whalen; Sudarshan Rajagopal; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.951

10.  Molecular Modeling of µ Opioid Receptor Ligands with Various Functional Properties: PZM21, SR-17018, Morphine, and Fentanyl-Simulated Interaction Patterns Confronted with Experimental Data.

Authors:  Sabina Podlewska; Ryszard Bugno; Lucja Kudla; Andrzej J Bojarski; Ryszard Przewlocki
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  MRAP2 inhibits β-arrestin recruitment to the ghrelin receptor by preventing GHSR1a phosphorylation.

Authors:  Alix A J Rouault; Paul Buscaglia; Julien A Sebag
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.486

Review 2.  Opioids and Vitamin C: Known Interactions and Potential for Redox-Signaling Crosstalk.

Authors:  Mackenzie Newman; Heather Connery; Jonathan Boyd
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  A Journey through Diastereomeric Space: The Design, Synthesis, In Vitro and In Vivo Pharmacological Activity, and Molecular Modeling of Novel Potent Diastereomeric MOR Agonists and Antagonists.

Authors:  Dana R Chambers; Agnieszka Sulima; Dan Luo; Thomas E Prisinzano; Alexander Goldberg; Bing Xie; Lei Shi; Carol A Paronis; Jack Bergman; Nima Nassehi; Dana E Selley; Gregory H Imler; Arthur E Jacobson; Kenner C Rice
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Comparison of an Addictive Potential of μ-Opioid Receptor Agonists with G Protein Bias: Behavioral and Molecular Modeling Studies.

Authors:  Lucja Kudla; Ryszard Bugno; Sabina Podlewska; Lukasz Szumiec; Lucja Wiktorowska; Andrzej J Bojarski; Ryszard Przewlocki
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.