Anny Castilla-Earls1, David J Francis2, Aquiles Iglesias3. 1. Department of Communication Disorders and Sciences, University of Houston, TX. 2. Texas Institute of Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, University of Houston. 3. University of Delaware, Newark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study examined the relationship between utterance length, syntactic complexity, and the probability of making an error at the utterance level. METHOD: The participants in this study included 830 Spanish-speaking first graders who were learning English at school. Story retells in both Spanish and English were collected from all children. Generalized mixed linear models were used to examine within-child and between-children effects of utterance length and subordination on the probability of making an error at the utterance level. RESULTS: The relationship between utterance length and grammaticality was found to differ by error type (omission vs. commission), language (Spanish vs. English), and level of analysis (within-child vs. between-children). For errors of commission, the probability of making an error increased as a child produced utterances that were longer relative to their average utterance length (within-child effect). Contrastively, for errors of omission, the probability of making an error decreased when a child produced utterances that were longer relative to their average utterance length (within-child effect). In English, a child who produced utterances that were, on average, longer than the average utterance length for all children produced more errors of commission and fewer errors of omission (between-children effect). This between-children effect was similar in Spanish for errors of commission but nonsignificant for errors of omission. For both error types, the within-child effects of utterance length were moderated by the use of subordination. CONCLUSION: The relationship between utterance length and grammaticality is complex and varies by error type, language, and whether the frame of reference is the child's own language (within-child effect) or the language of other children (between-children effect). SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.17035916.
PURPOSE: This study examined the relationship between utterance length, syntactic complexity, and the probability of making an error at the utterance level. METHOD: The participants in this study included 830 Spanish-speaking first graders who were learning English at school. Story retells in both Spanish and English were collected from all children. Generalized mixed linear models were used to examine within-child and between-children effects of utterance length and subordination on the probability of making an error at the utterance level. RESULTS: The relationship between utterance length and grammaticality was found to differ by error type (omission vs. commission), language (Spanish vs. English), and level of analysis (within-child vs. between-children). For errors of commission, the probability of making an error increased as a child produced utterances that were longer relative to their average utterance length (within-child effect). Contrastively, for errors of omission, the probability of making an error decreased when a child produced utterances that were longer relative to their average utterance length (within-child effect). In English, a child who produced utterances that were, on average, longer than the average utterance length for all children produced more errors of commission and fewer errors of omission (between-children effect). This between-children effect was similar in Spanish for errors of commission but nonsignificant for errors of omission. For both error types, the within-child effects of utterance length were moderated by the use of subordination. CONCLUSION: The relationship between utterance length and grammaticality is complex and varies by error type, language, and whether the frame of reference is the child's own language (within-child effect) or the language of other children (between-children effect). SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.17035916.
Authors: Alisa Baron; Lisa M Bedore; Elizabeth D Peña; Samantha D Lovgren-Uribe; Amanda A López; Elizabeth Villagran Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2018-08-06 Impact factor: 2.408
Authors: Vera F Gutie Rrez-Clellen; M Adelaida Restrepo; Lisa Bedore; Elizabeth Pen A; Raquel Anderson Journal: Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 2.983