| Literature DB >> 34817786 |
Briana Williams1, Joseph J Saseen1, Toby Trujillo1,2, Surabhi Palkimas3,4.
Abstract
Warfarin is recognized as the standard treatment for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS); however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent appealing therapeutic alternatives given their lack of monitoring and limited drug interactions. A few randomized controlled trials comparing rivaroxaban with warfarin showed an increased risk of recurrent thromboembolism, specifically arterial thrombosis, in patients with high risk forms of APS such as those that are triple antibody positive. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all patients within our health system from 2015 to 2020 with a diagnosis of APS (single or double antibody positive) and history of venous thromboembolism. We sought to compare the proportion of patients with a recurrent thrombosis when prescribed a DOAC versus warfarin. Among 96 patients included, 57 were prescribed warfarin and 39 were prescribed a DOAC (90% rivaroxaban). The proportion of patients with a recurrent thromboembolism was almost three times higher in the DOAC group (15.4%) compared to the warfarin group (5.3%), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Major bleeding was not different between groups. Our findings suggest that rivaroxaban may pose an increased risk for recurrent thromboembolism in low risk APS patients that are single or double-antibody positive compared to warfarin. Results of our study should be cautiously applied to DOACs besides rivaroxaban given their small representation in this study.Entities:
Keywords: Antiphospholipid syndrome; Apixaban; Direct oral anticoagulant; Rivaroxaban; VKA; Warfarin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34817786 DOI: 10.1007/s11239-021-02587-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis ISSN: 0929-5305 Impact factor: 2.300