Literature DB >> 34816789

The Effect of Tri-Modality Therapy with Bladder Preservation for Selective Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Zhang Zhiyu1, Zhou Qi1, Song Zhen1, Ouyang Jun1, Zhang Jianglei1.   

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of complete transurethral resection of bladder tumor combined with postoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical cystectomy (RC) in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. Clinical data of 125 patients with MIBC admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from December 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, in which 79 patients (tri-modality therapy [TMT] group) received TMT bladder-sparing treatment, and 41 patients (RC group) received RC. The differences of probabilities for 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, and comprehensive overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS) between 2 groups were calculated using Kaplan-Meier product limited estimates. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect potential risk factors for OS and PFS.
Results: There was no statistical difference between the TMT group and RC group in the 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, comprehensive OS rate, and PFS rate. And survival analysis found no significant difference in OS and PFS between the 2 groups. Univariate analysis showed that age, TNM staging, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were associated with OS, while PNI was connected to tumor recurrence. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that TNM staging and PNI were independent risk factors for OS. Conclusions: TMT can be used as an alternative to RC for MIBC patients under the premise of strict control of indications, rigorous postoperative follow-up, and timely salvage cystectomy. PNI was negatively correlated with OS and PFS, while TNM staging was positively correlated with OS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIBC; PNI; bladder-sparing; tri-modality therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34816789      PMCID: PMC8649089          DOI: 10.1177/15330338211062323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


Introduction

It is reported that bladder cancer is the second most common malignant cancer in the genitourinary system. Radical cystectomy (RC) is known as the standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, this procedure is highly invasive and risky, and has a significant impact on the quality of life of the patients. A combined modality therapy that maximizes the preservation of bladder function without compromising oncotherapy is an alternative that may be considered. The Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) experience introduced a tri-modality therapy (TMT) with bladder preservation for selective MIBC patients, which shares a similar OS to RC patients. And a large number of studies reported that the bladder-sparing methods may produce favorable results in carefully selected patients from western society.[5-7] However, there is still a lack of data to verify whether this treatment is suitable for patients from China. Our study summarized the clinical data of 125 patients with MIBC admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between December 2012 and December 2015, 79 of whom received TMT and 46 of whom received RC, and they were followed up for more than 5 years to compare the effects of 2 kinds of treatments on overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS).

Materials and Methods

Clinical Data

This is a single-center, retrospective study. From December 2012 to December 2015, patients diagnosed with MIBC were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Inclusion criteria included pathologically confirmed MIBC and clinical stage T2-T4aN0M0. Exclusion criteria included a history of autoimmune disease or infectious disease. A total of 125 patients were candidates for this study, including 114 males and 11 females, with 79 cases receiving TMT and 46 cases receiving RC. The mean tumor diameter was (33.90  ±  2.61) mm and the average age was (69.66  ±  1.92) years. According to TNM staging of the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer in 2017, there were 91 cases defined as T2, 22 cases defined as T3, and 12 cases defined as T4a. The follow-up time ranged from 5 to 97 months, with an average of 51.36  ±  4.12 months. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). Our research was approved by the ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (approved ID: No. 119[2020]) and all the patients signed consent forms before the study.

Treatment Protocols

RC Group

All the patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) first and the pathology was confirmed as MIBC. Meanwhile, preoperative chest, abdomen, and pelvic enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed no distant metastasis. At the same time, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score was 0 to 2 points. Finally, RC and urinary diversion were performed after informed consent was signed with the family members.

TMT Group

All the patients first received TURBT and the pathology was proved as MIBC. No distant metastasis was confirmed by preoperative chest, abdomen, and pelvic enhanced CT or MRI. And the ECOG score was 0 to 2, with no contraindication found for radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy. After the informed consent was signed, the patients underwent complete TURBT (cTURBT), in which all the visible bladder tumors should be resected with random bladder biopsy and surgical wound base biopsy negative. Intravenous chemotherapy including gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (day 1 and day 8), cisplatin 70 mg/m2 (day 2) was performed within 2 to 4 weeks after the surgery, with a cycle of 3 weeks, a total of 3 cycles. Carboplatin was used to replace cisplatin when the creatinine clearance rate was 40 to 60 mL/min. RT of 24 to 25 Gy was received after chemotherapy.

Follow-up

All patients were reexamined every 3 months within 2 years, every 6 months within 2 to 5 years, and once a year after 5 years. The reexamination included a chest x-ray and abdominal and pelvis CT or MRI. For patients who received TMT, cystoscopy, and urine cytology should be taken every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 5 years, and annually for at least 10 years.

Statistical Analysis

The quantitative data were expressed as mean  ±  standard deviation, and comparisons between 2 groups were determined using the Mann–Whitney U-test. The comparisons of cumulative data between the 2 groups were examined by χ2 test. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0. GraphPad Prism 8.0 was used to draw survival curves. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests were used for survival analysis. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to find independent risk factors. And a p-value was considered statistically significant if p < .05. The sample size calculation was calculated by R software (version 4.1.0) and the number in our study to show significance was 103. All the data was checked by 2 different senior statisticians.

Results

Baseline Levels Comparison Between 2 Groups

There was no significant difference found between the RC group and TMT group in age, gender, body mass index (BMI), high blood pressure (HBP), diabetes mellitus (DM), TNM staging, tumor diameter, preoperative creatinine levels, and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Comparisons of patients’ characteristics between the TMT group and the RC group.

FactorsTMT groupRC groupt2 valuep-value
Age (years)69.79 ± 2.5169.44 ± 3.060.173.863
Gender 0.623.533
 Male (n)7341
 Female (n)65
BMI (kg/m2)23.11 ± 0.8823.58 ± 1.110.659.511
HBP 0.988.323
 Yes (n)2224
 No (n)4534
DM 1.454.146
 Yes (n)3016
 No (n)6118
TNM staging 2.182.336
 T2N0M0 (n)6130
 T3N0M0 (n)1210
 T4aN0M0 (n)66
Tumor diameter (mm)31.96 ± 2.7932.22 ± 5.241.943.054
Creatinine level (μmol/L)96.00 ± 16.74100.96 ± 25.330.340.735
PNI (%)45.97 ± 1.7843.22 ± 2.791.74.084

Abbreviations: TMT, tri-modality therapy; RC, radical cystectomy; BMI, body mass index; HBP, high blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.

Comparisons of patients’ characteristics between the TMT group and the RC group. Abbreviations: TMT, tri-modality therapy; RC, radical cystectomy; BMI, body mass index; HBP, high blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.

OS and PFS in 2 Groups

The TMT group was followed up for 9 to 97 months, with an average of 47.84  ±  5.18 months, and the RC group was followed up for 5 to 90 months, with an average of 57.41  ±  6.69 months. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in follow-up time (t  =  2.253, p  =  .051). The 1-year, 2-year, 5-year, and comprehensive OS rate (94.94% vs 93.48%, 79.75% vs 89.13%, 32.91% vs 50.00%, 26.58% vs 19.57%, respectively) and PFS rate (74.68% vs 82.61%, 50.63% vs 65.22%, 33.75% vs 48.89%, 10.13% vs 17.39%, respectively) in TMT group and RC group showed no statistical significance (Table 2). And the survival analysis proved that patients who received TMT or RC shared a similar time of OS and PFS (Figure 1).
Table 2.

Comparisons of OS and PFS between 2 groups.

TMT groupRC groupχ2 valuep-value
1-year OS 0.342.732
 Censored7543
 Death43
1-year PFS 1.025.305
 Censored5938
 Recurrence208
2-year OS 1.353.176
 Censored6341
 Death165
2-year PFS 1.584.113
 Censored4030
 Recurrence3916
5-year OS 1.887.059
 Censored2623
 Death5323
5-year PFS 1.255.209
 Censored99
 Recurrence7037
Comprehensive OS .886.376
 Censored219
 Death5837
Comprehensive PFS 1.172.241
 Censored88
 Recurrence7138

Abbreviations: TMT, tri-modality therapy; RC, radical cystectomy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progress-free survival.

Figure 1.

Survival curve of OS and PFS for TMT group and RC group. (A) Survival curve of OS showed that there was no significant difference between the TMT group and the RC group (t = 1.690, p = .091). (B) Survival curve of PFS also showed that there was no significant difference between the TMT group and the RC group (t = 1.867, p = .062).

Survival curve of OS and PFS for TMT group and RC group. (A) Survival curve of OS showed that there was no significant difference between the TMT group and the RC group (t = 1.690, p = .091). (B) Survival curve of PFS also showed that there was no significant difference between the TMT group and the RC group (t = 1.867, p = .062). Comparisons of OS and PFS between 2 groups. Abbreviations: TMT, tri-modality therapy; RC, radical cystectomy; OS, overall survival; PFS, progress-free survival.

Influencing Factors of OS and PFS

Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, TNM staging, and PNI were negatively associated with OS, while PNI was negatively connected to PFS (Table 3). Further multiple linear regression analysis found that TNM staging and PNI were independent risk factors for OS (Table 4). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.7675 (Figure 2).
Table 3.

Univariate analysis of influencing factors of OS and PFS.

FactorsOSt2 valuep-valuePFSt2 valuep-value
CensoredDeathCensoredRecurrence
Age (years)66.13 ± 3.6970.77 ± 2.232.0680.04165.88 ± 6.0970.21 ± 2.031.502.136
Gender 0.2660.790 0.386.700
Male (n)2787 1599
Female (n)38 110
BMI (kg/m2)24.34 ± 1.5322.95 ± 0.761.7330.08625.02 ± 2.1823.03 ± 0.711.955.053
HBP 0.4540.650 0.309.757
Yes (n)1552 859
No (n)1543 850
DM 1.4870.137 0.813.416
Yes (n)2566 1378
No (n)529 331
TNM Staging 8.7570.013 4.211.122
T2N0M0 (n)2863 1576
T3N0M0 (n)220 121
T4aN0M0 (n)012 012
Tumor diameter (mm)29.67 ± 4.8835.23 ± 3.071.8190.07133.44 ± 7.8333.96 ± 2.810.133.895
Creatinine level (μmol/L)79.80 ± 6.80103.52 ± 18.091.4490.15086.88 ± 9.6199.43 ± 15.890.596.552
PNI (%)39.31 ± 3.5546.74 ± 1.524.437<0.00137.51 ± 4.4746.05 ± 1.533.929<.001

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HBP, high blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; OS, overall survival; PFS, progress-free survival.

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analysis for independent risk factors of OS.

FactorsCoefficientStd. error95% confidence Intervalt valuep-value
Age0.004(0.003)(-0.003, 0.01)1.188.237
TNM staging .007
T2N0M00(0)(0, 0)0-
T3N0M00.209(0.081)(0.049, 0.369)2.592.011
T4aN0M00.191(0.072)(0.049, 0.332)2.663.009
PNI0.017(0.004)(0.008, 0.026)3.763< .001
constant-0.312(0.261)(-0.829, 0.205)-1.194.235

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.

Figure 2.

ROC curve of the model for independent risk factors for OS with an AUC of 0.7675.

ROC curve of the model for independent risk factors for OS with an AUC of 0.7675. Univariate analysis of influencing factors of OS and PFS. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HBP, high blood pressure; DM, diabetes mellitus; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; OS, overall survival; PFS, progress-free survival. Multiple linear regression analysis for independent risk factors of OS. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; PNI, prognostic nutritional index.

Discussion

Bladder cancer is 1 of the most common malignancies in urology. Among the first diagnosed patients with bladder cancer, approximately 25% to 30% are MIBC. The standard mode of treatment for MIBC is RC, which includes radical cystectomy, urinary diversion, and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. For men, the prostate and seminal vesicle glands should be removed simultaneously, and for women, the uterus, bilateral adnexa, and part of the anterior wall of the vagina should be removed at the same time. It is reported that the 5-year PFS rate was 58% to 68%, and the 5-year OS rate was 66%. However, due to the wide range of surgical resection, long operation time, and high incidence of complications, the quality of life of patients after surgery is greatly affected, young patients will lose fertility function, and most patients will lose sexual function, many patients will finally give up the surgery. James et al. first reported that TURBT combined with postoperative chemotherapy, nearly one-third of patients benefitted from the degradation of TNM staging. Büchser et al. conclude that the bladder preservation rate could reach up to 79% and the 5-year OS and PFS were 52% and 64% within 10 years under the strategy of TMT, which was made up of cTURBT and chemoradiotherapy. A prospective study also found that the complete response rate after TMT was 69% and the 5-year OS and PFS were 57% and 71%, and the outcomes were similar to that of RC. Recently, more and more relevant studies have found that TURBT combined with postoperative chemoradiotherapy is another option for the treatment of MIBC.[3,12-14] However, there are few reports on the effect of TMT strategy on the Chinese population. Our study was aimed to compare the efficacy of TMT treatment with RC treatment in some Chinese populations. Despite the 1-year OS (94.94% vs 93.48%), TMT group had a lower rate than RC group in 2-year and 5-year OS (79.75% vs 89.13%, 32.91% vs 50.00%). But no statistical significance was found between the 2 groups. And although the 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year PFS rates of the TMT group were lower than that of the RC group (74.68% vs 82.61%, 50.63% vs 65.22%, 33.75% vs 48.89%, 10.13% vs 17.39%), there was still no significant difference between 2 groups. The survival curve of OS and PFS of the TMT group and RC group further verified that the 2 treatments were statistically equally effective for patients with MIBC of T2-T4aN0M0. Our research also found that PNI was negatively associated with OS and PFS in MIBC, which was consistent with the results of Peng et al. We summarized the experience of our hospital in TMT strategy as follows: (1) cTURBT emphasizes the resection of all visible bladder tumors, and the resection depth should be appropriate to see the fat layer outside the bladder. And pathology of the basal tissue must be negative. (2) Platinum-based chemotherapeutic regimens are recognized as effective therapeutic measures for MIBC. If renal function is poor, it is recommended to change cisplatin to less nephrotoxic carboplatin. The main adverse reactions during chemotherapy included nausea and vomiting, alopecia, bone marrow suppression, and abnormal liver function, and no serious complications occurred in our study. The response rate of MIBC to RT is low, but Gemcitabine has a radiosensitization effect for patients who received low-dose external irradiation, which included bladder and pelvic lymph nodes. There were 4 patients who developed radiation cystitis, of which 2 patients disappeared after the end of RT after symptomatic treatment, and 1 patient developed urethral stricture requiring regular urethral dilation. (3) Bladder preservation requires close follow-up, and timely salvage cystectomy is recommended in the case of recurrent invasive tumor or recurrent nonmuscular invasive bladder cancer. There were 12 cases that underwent salvage RC after recurrence, which accounted for 15.19% of the TMT group. And among the 12 recurrent cases in the TMT group, 5 cases were diagnosed with pelvic metastasis. There were some limitations reserved in this study. First, it is a retrospective study and conducted in a single-center, which may cause bias and misleading findings. Second, the limited number of patients may make the conclusions statistically underpowered. Third, the follow-up period is not very long compared to similar studies, which makes the results less convincing.

Conclusions

Based on the experience of our center, TMT strategy for MIBC with the T2-T4aN0M0 stage can help improve the quality of life while preserving the bladder, and also achieve a similar long-term OS and PFS to RC. Therefore, under the premise of strict control of indications, full informed consent before surgery, rigorous follow-up after surgery, and timely salvage cystectomy, the TMT strategy can be used as an alternative to RC for MIBC patients.
  15 in total

1.  Long-term Outcomes After Bladder-preserving Tri-modality Therapy for Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: An Updated Analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Nicholas J Giacalone; William U Shipley; Rebecca H Clayman; Andrzej Niemierko; Michael Drumm; Niall M Heney; Marc D Michaelson; Richard J Lee; Philip J Saylor; Matthew F Wszolek; Adam S Feldman; Douglas M Dahl; Anthony L Zietman; Jason A Efstathiou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Long-term Outcomes and Patterns of Failure Following Trimodality Treatment With Bladder Preservation for Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  David Büchser; Almudena Zapatero; Jacobo Rogado; Marisol Talaya; Carmen Martín de Vidales; Ramón Arellano; Gloria Bocardo; Alfonso Cruz Conde; Leopoldo Pérez; María T Murillo
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian Burger; James W F Catto; Guido Dalbagni; H Barton Grossman; Harry Herr; Pierre Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Carlo La Vecchia; Shahrokh Shariat; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Comparison of Outcomes in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder Preservation.

Authors:  Jim Zhong; Jeffrey Switchenko; Naresh K Jegadeesh; Richard J Cassidy; Theresa W Gillespie; Viraj Master; Peter Nieh; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Omer Kucuk; Bradley Carthon; Christopher P Filson; Mehmet A Bilen; Ashesh B Jani
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Selective bladder preservation by combined modality protocol treatment: long-term outcomes of 190 patients with invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  W U Shipley; D S Kaufman; E Zehr; N M Heney; S C Lane; H K Thakral; A F Althausen; A L Zietman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Phase I-II RTOG study (99-06) of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing transurethral surgery, paclitaxel, cisplatin, and twice-daily radiotherapy followed by selective bladder preservation or radical cystectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Donald S Kaufman; Kathryn A Winter; William U Shipley; Niall M Heney; H James Wallace; Leonard M Toonkel; Anthony L Zietman; Simon Tanguay; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Combined-modality treatment and selective organ preservation in invasive bladder cancer: long-term results.

Authors:  Claus Rödel; Gerhard G Grabenbauer; Reinhard Kühn; Thomas Papadopoulos; Jürgen Dunst; Martin Meyer; Karl M Schrott; Rolf Sauer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized noninferiority trial of reduced high-dose volume versus standard volume radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results of the BC2001 trial (CRUK/01/004).

Authors:  Robert A Huddart; Emma Hall; Syed A Hussain; Peter Jenkins; Christine Rawlings; Jean Tremlett; Malcolm Crundwell; Fawzi A Adab; Denise Sheehan; Isabel Syndikus; Carey Hendron; Rebecca Lewis; Rachel Waters; Nicholas D James
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index is a Significant Predictor of Survival with Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ding Peng; Yan-Qing Gong; Han Hao; Zhi-Song He; Xue-Song Li; Cui-Jian Zhang; Li-Qun Zhou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  Bladder Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Andrew T Lenis; Patrick M Lec; Karim Chamie; M D Mshs
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.