| Literature DB >> 34816382 |
João Paulo Loureiro Damasceno1, Hemerson Silva da Rosa1, Luciana Silva de Araújo1, Niege Araçari Jacometti Cardoso Furtado2.
Abstract
Diterpene lactones have been identified as active compounds in several medicinal plants, including Andrographis paniculata (Burm. f.) Nees, which is a medicinal plant that has been used for centuries across the world. Andrographolide is the major diterpene from A. paniculata and the main bioactive constituent of this species. The effectiveness of diterpenes can be affected by factors that limit their oral bioavailability, such as their poor water solubility, slow dissolution rates, low gastrointestinal absorption, high chemical and metabolic instability, and rapid excretion. In this context, the purpose of the present review is to compile and compare literature data on the bioavailability of diterpene lactones from A. paniculata after oral administration in medicinal plant extracts or in their free forms and to highlight strategies that have been used to improve their oral bioavailability. Considering that medicinal plant extracts are commonly used as dried powder that is reconstituted in water before oral administration, novel pharmaceutical formulation strategies that are used to overcome difficulties with diterpene solubility are also compiled in this review. The use of self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems is a good strategy to enhance the dissolution and consequently the bioavailability of andrographolide after oral administration of A. paniculata extract formulations. On the other hand, herbosome technology, pH-sensitive nanoparticles, nanosuspensions, nanoemulsions, nanocrystal suspensions, nanocrystal-based solid dispersions, and solid dispersion systems are useful to formulate andrographolide in its free form and increase its oral bioavailability. The use of a suitable andrographolide delivery system is essential to achieve its therapeutic potential.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34816382 PMCID: PMC8609994 DOI: 10.1007/s13318-021-00736-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ISSN: 0378-7966 Impact factor: 2.569
Fig. 1Chemical structures of four major active diterpenes from Andrographis paniculata: andrographolide (1), 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide (2), neoandrographolide (3), and 14-deoxyandrographolide (4)
Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) of the four major active diterpenes andrographolide (1), 14-deoxy-11,12-didehydroandrographolide (2), neoandrographolide (3), and 14-deoxyandrographolide (4) after multiple oral administration of Andrographis paniculata capsules in healthy Thai volunteers, as determined by Pholphana et al. [12]
| Diterpene | Dose of each diterpene in | Sex | AUC0–t (ng·h/mL) | AUC0–t/dose (dose normalized) (ng·h/mL)/(mg/kg) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.16 ± 0.28 | Male | 47.58 ± 8.24 | 94.64 ± 15.12 | 0.80 ± 0.15 | 30.08 ± 5.55 | 60.05 ± 11.49 | |
| Female | 62.87 ± 10.63 | 99.52 ± 14.66 | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 34.74 ± 4.02 | 56.17 ± 6.33 | ||
| 1.35 ± 0.04 | Male | 108.77 ± 8.82 | 1318.26 ± 116.04 | 0.90 ± 0.07 | 36.31 ± 4.29 | 434.13 ± 45.98 | |
| Female | 147.56 ± 9.94 | 1452.53 ± 110.62 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 53.48 ± 4.87 | 529.50 ± 55.46 | ||
| 0.90 ± 0.03 | Male | 8.59 ± 0.74 | 155.83 ± 14.36 | 0.70 ± 0.08 | 8.70 ± 0.82 | 156.46 ± 13.09 | |
| Female | 8.70 ± 0.54 | 128.19 ± 8.10 | 0.83 ± 0.08 | 7.66 ± 0.62 | 113.10 ± 9.40 | ||
| 0.96 ± 0.04 | Male | 10.07 ± 0.07 | 168.83 ± 15.57 | 0.75 ± 0.08 | 9.65 ± 1.20 | 160.02 ± 15.57 | |
| Female | 10.65 ± 0.78 | 147.68 ± 12.48 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 9.82 ± 0.62 | 135.96 ± 10.27 |
AUC area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, C maximum concentration, T time to reach C
Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) of andrographolide after oral administration of Andrographis paniculata extract preparations
| Dose of andrographolide | Species | AUC (ng·h/mL) | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60% ethanolic water soluble extract of | 20 mg/kg of extract (5% andrographolide) | Male Wistar rats | 7090 ± 1550a | 2.41 ± 0.15 | 1273 ± 200 | [ |
| 60% ethanolic water soluble extract of | 200 mg/kg of extract (5% andrographolide) | Male Wistar rats | 15070 ± 2000a | 1.67 ± 0.3 | 3000 ± 600 | [ |
| Aqueous suspension of | 35 mg/kg andrographolide | Rabbits | 109.75 ± 4.07b | 1.5 | 90 ± 20 | [ |
| 35 mg/kg andrographolide | Rabbits | 2882.8 ± 123.50b | 1.5 | 800 ± 50 | [ | |
| 17.5 mg/kg andrographolide | Rabbits | 1707.24 ± 145.8b | 1.5 | 540 ± 70 | [ | |
| 17.5 mg/kg andrographolide | Rabbits | 1480.85 ± 321.29b | 1.5 | 440 ± 60 | [ |
AUC area under the concentration-time curve, C maximum concentration, SMEDDS self-microemulsifying drug delivery system, T time to reach Cmax
aAUC0–∞, bAUC0–12h
Fig. 2Chemical structures of andrographolide (AG) and some of its metabolites identified in humans (HM) and in rats (RM)
Pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± SD) of andrographolide after oral administration of different formulations of this diterpene
| Andrographolide formulation | Dose of diterpene | Species | AUC0–∞ (ng·h/mL) | Reference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrographolide solid dispersion formulation | 100 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 928.2 ± 181.1 | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 254.0 ± 59.7 | [ |
| Andrographolide suspension | 300 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 953.3 ± 130.3 | 2.1 ± 1.8 | 206.6 ± 57.6 | [ |
| Andrographolide-loaded nanoemulsion formulation | 100 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 3700 ± 240 | 0.08 | 3780 ± 880 | [ |
| Andrographolide suspension | 300 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 1870 ± 170 | 0.75 ± 0.18 | 730 ± 80 | [ |
| Andrographolide in distilled water with 0.3 g/kg carboxymethyl cellulose | 25 mg/kg | Male albino Wistar rats | 26740 ± 1420 | 2.50 | 6790 ± 540 | [ |
| Andrographolide herbosome | 25 mg/kg | Male albino Wistar rats | 87300 ± 2350 | 4.0 | 9640 ± 720 | [ |
| Pure andrographolide in 0.3 % carboxymethyl cellulose | 10 mg/kg | Male albino Wistar rats | 2169 ± 143 | 1.00 ± 0.06 | 830 ± 50 | [ |
| Andrographolide nanoparticles | 10 mg/kg | Male albino Wistar rats | 4807 ± 261 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 2670 ± 130 | [ |
| Andrographolide coarse powder | 40 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 94.44 ± 27.57 | 28.75 ± 12.50 min | 77.74 ± 22.17 | [ |
| Physical mixture of andrographolide coarse powder, TGPS, and sodium lauryl sulfate | 40 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 152.00 ± 35.52 | 22.00 ± 9.48 min | 80.25 ± 17.35 | [ |
| Andrographolide dripping pills | 40 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 172.30 ± 27.45 | 22.50 ± 5.57 min | 168.17 ± 47.28 | [ |
| Freeze-dried andrographolide nanosuspensions with TGPS | 40 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 367.82 ± 91.40 | 12.50 ± 8.80 min | 235.91 ± 53.73 | [ |
| Freeze-dried andrographolide nanosuspensions without TGPS | 40 mg/kg | Male Sprague Dawley rats | 253.19 ± 27.34 | 22.00 ± 10.00 min | 200.49 ± 18.91 | [ |
| Andrographolide nanocrystal-based solid dispersion | 20 mg/kg | Male Wistar rats | 1,794.783 ± 311.213 | 0.44 ± 0.14 | 323.423 ± 43.527 | [ |
| Andrographolide nanocrystal suspension | 20 mg/kg | Male Wistar rats | 1,564.784 ± 416.853 | 0.36 ± 0.17 | 346.741 ± 38.163 | [ |
| Water-dispersed crude andrographolide | 20 mg/kg | Male Wistar rats | 379.521 ± 124.233 | 1.11 ± 0.23 | 52.506 ± 10.652 | [ |
AUC area under the concentration-time curve, C maximum concentration, T time to reach Cmax in hours unless specified otherwise
aMean ± SD, unless specified otherwise
| Products of |
| The diterpene lactones identified as active compounds in this species are poorly soluble in water and show slow dissolution rates. Their solubility behavior presents a major challenge to achieving a pharmacological effect. |
| Suitable pharmaceutical technologies improve the dissolution rate and oral bioavailability of diterpene lactones from |