Literature DB >> 34816322

Geodesic-based distance reveals nonlinear topological features in neural activity from mouse visual cortex.

Kosio Beshkov1,2,3, Paul Tiesinga1.   

Abstract

An increasingly popular approach to the analysis of neural data is to treat activity patterns as being constrained to and sampled from a manifold, which can be characterized by its topology. The persistent homology method identifies the type and number of holes in the manifold, thereby yielding functional information about the coding and dynamic properties of the underlying neural network. In this work, we give examples of highly nonlinear manifolds in which the persistent homology algorithm fails when it uses the Euclidean distance because it does not always yield a good approximation to the true distance distribution of a point cloud sampled from a manifold. To deal with this issue, we instead estimate the geodesic distance which is a better approximation of the true distance distribution and can therefore be used to successfully identify highly nonlinear features with persistent homology. To document the utility of the method, we utilize a toy model comprised of a circular manifold, built from orthogonal sinusoidal coordinate functions and show how the choice of metric determines the performance of the persistent homology algorithm. Furthermore, we explore the robustness of the method across different manifold properties, like the number of samples, curvature and amount of added noise. We point out strategies for interpreting its results as well as some possible pitfalls of its application. Subsequently, we apply this analysis to neural data coming from the Visual Coding-Neuropixels dataset recorded at the Allen Institute in mouse visual cortex in response to stimulation with drifting gratings. We find that different manifolds with a non-trivial topology can be seen across regions and stimulus properties. Finally, we interpret how these changes in manifold topology along with stimulus parameters and cortical region inform how the brain performs visual computation.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geodesics; Neural coding; Neural manifolds; Persistent homology; Topological data analysis; Visual processing

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34816322     DOI: 10.1007/s00422-021-00906-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  23 in total

Review 1.  A spherical model for orientation and spatial-frequency tuning in a cortical hypercolumn.

Authors:  Paul C Bressloff; Jack D Cowan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The intrinsic attractor manifold and population dynamics of a canonical cognitive circuit across waking and sleep.

Authors:  Rishidev Chaudhuri; Berk Gerçek; Biraj Pandey; Adrien Peyrache; Ila Fiete
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Neural Manifolds for the Control of Movement.

Authors:  Juan A Gallego; Matthew G Perich; Lee E Miller; Sara A Solla
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Functional specialization of mouse higher visual cortical areas.

Authors:  Mark L Andermann; Aaron M Kerlin; Demetris K Roumis; Lindsey L Glickfeld; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Systematic Integration of Structural and Functional Data into Multi-scale Models of Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Yazan N Billeh; Binghuang Cai; Sergey L Gratiy; Kael Dai; Ramakrishnan Iyer; Nathan W Gouwens; Reza Abbasi-Asl; Xiaoxuan Jia; Joshua H Siegle; Shawn R Olsen; Christof Koch; Stefan Mihalas; Anton Arkhipov
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A large-scale standardized physiological survey reveals functional organization of the mouse visual cortex.

Authors:  Saskia E J de Vries; Jerome A Lecoq; Michael A Buice; Peter A Groblewski; Gabriel K Ocker; Michael Oliver; David Feng; Nicholas Cain; Peter Ledochowitsch; Daniel Millman; Kate Roll; Marina Garrett; Tom Keenan; Leonard Kuan; Stefan Mihalas; Shawn Olsen; Carol Thompson; Wayne Wakeman; Jack Waters; Derric Williams; Chris Barber; Nathan Berbesque; Brandon Blanchard; Nicholas Bowles; Shiella D Caldejon; Linzy Casal; Andrew Cho; Sissy Cross; Chinh Dang; Tim Dolbeare; Melise Edwards; John Galbraith; Nathalie Gaudreault; Terri L Gilbert; Fiona Griffin; Perry Hargrave; Robert Howard; Lawrence Huang; Sean Jewell; Nika Keller; Ulf Knoblich; Josh D Larkin; Rachael Larsen; Chris Lau; Eric Lee; Felix Lee; Arielle Leon; Lu Li; Fuhui Long; Jennifer Luviano; Kyla Mace; Thuyanh Nguyen; Jed Perkins; Miranda Robertson; Sam Seid; Eric Shea-Brown; Jianghong Shi; Nathan Sjoquist; Cliff Slaughterbeck; David Sullivan; Ryan Valenza; Casey White; Ali Williford; Daniela M Witten; Jun Zhuang; Hongkui Zeng; Colin Farrell; Lydia Ng; Amy Bernard; John W Phillips; R Clay Reid; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  A topological paradigm for hippocampal spatial map formation using persistent homology.

Authors:  Y Dabaghian; F Mémoli; L Frank; G Carlsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Cell groups reveal structure of stimulus space.

Authors:  Carina Curto; Vladimir Itskov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A Topological Model of the Hippocampal Cell Assembly Network.

Authors:  Andrey Babichev; Daoyun Ji; Facundo Mémoli; Yuri A Dabaghian
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Topological Schemas of Memory Spaces.

Authors:  Andrey Babichev; Yuri A Dabaghian
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.