| Literature DB >> 34812990 |
Christian Brandstaetter1,2, Nora Fricko1, Mohammad J Rahimi3, Johann Fellner1, Wolfgang Ecker-Lala2, Irina S Druzhinina3,4.
Abstract
Biological waste degradation is the main driving factor for landfill emissions. In a 2-year laboratory experiment simulating different landfill in-situ aeration scenarios, the microbial degradation of solid waste under different oxygen conditions (treatments) was investigated. Nine landfill simulation reactors were operated in triplicates under three distinct treatments. Three were kept anaerobic, three were aerated for 706 days after an initial anaerobic phase and three were aerated for 244 days in between two anaerobic phases. In total, 36 solid and 36 leachate samples were taken. Biolog® EcoPlates™ were used to assess the functional diversity of the microbial community. It was possible to directly relate the functional diversity to the biodegradability of MSW (municipal solid waste), measured as RI4 (respiration index after 4 days). The differences between the treatments in RI4 as well as in carbon and polymer degradation potential were small. Initially, a RI4 of about 6.5 to 8 mg O2 kg-1 DW was reduced to less than 1 mg O2 kg-1 DW within 114 days of treatment. After the termination of aeration, an increase 3 mg O2 kg-1 DW was observed. By calculating the integral of the Gompertz equation based on spline interpolation of the Biolog® EcoPlates™ results after 96 h two substrate groups mainly contributing to the biodegradability were identified: carbohydrates and polymers. The microbial activity of the respective microbial consortium could thus be related to the biodegradability with a multilinear regression model.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradation; Biolog® EcoPlates™ ; Gompertz equation; In-situ aeration; Municipal solid waste
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34812990 PMCID: PMC8803693 DOI: 10.1007/s10532-021-09967-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biodegradation ISSN: 0923-9820 Impact factor: 3.909
Substrates
| Substrate group | Substrate |
|---|---|
| Amines | Phenylethylamine |
| Putrescine | |
| Amino acids | Glycyl- |
| Carbohydrates | α- |
| Glucose-1-phosphate | |
| i-Erythritol | |
| β-Methyl- | |
| Carboxylic acids | 2-Hydroxy benzoic acid |
| 4-Hydroxy benzoic acid | |
| γ-Hydroxybutyric acid | |
| Itaconic acid | |
| Pyruvic acid methyl ester | |
| α-Ketobutyric acid | |
| Polymers | α-Cyclodextrin |
| Glycogen | |
| Tween 40 | |
| Tween 80 |
Gompertz calculation success rate
| Treatment/days | 0 | 57 | 114 | 358 | 763 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobic | 69/93 | 54/93 | 88/93 | 67/93 | 72/93 |
| % | (74.2) | (58.1) | (94.6) | (72) | (77.4) |
| Mixed | 76/93 | 88/93 | 92/93 | 52/93 | 27/62* |
| % | (81.7) | (94.6) | (98.9) | (55.9) | (43.5) |
| Anaerobic | 87 / 93 | 44 / 93 | |||
| % | (93.5) | (47.3) |
Left number: successful gompertz equation derivation. right number: total number of substrates in subgroup. number in brackets: Percentage. *In this subgroup one sample was missing—the mean was applied for each measurement. Mixed Treatment starts with anaerobic, then was switched to aerobic (1 year), then anaerobic again
Fig. 1Dynamics of microbial respiratory activity in solid samples depending on the biochemical group of the carbon source and the landfill type. Mixed treatment started anaerobically, then was switched to aerobic (1 year), then to anaerobic again. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey HSD-test (p = 0.05). At the beginning and the end all reactors (n = 9) were sampled. From day 57 to 358 only aerobic reactors were sampled (n = 6). Values were scaled according to values from T = 0. Error bars indicate standard error (day 0: n = 9; day 763: n = 3; all others: n = 6). Aeration status represents the conditions during sampling .aer aerobic, ana anaerobic, O.D. optical density
Fig. 2Influence of the sampling method on the microbial respiratory activity—Solids vs. Leachate. The leachate samples directly stem from the reactor leachate, while the solid samples were derived through the elution of solid sample material. Stars indicate significant differences according to Wilcoxon-range-test. At the beginning and the end all reactors were sampled (n = 9). From day 57 to 358 only aerobic reactors were sampled (n = 6). Values were scaled according to values from T = 0. Error bars indicate standard error. O.D. optical density. ***; **; *.
Fig. 5Timeline carbohydrates. Mixed treatment started anaerobically, then was switched to aerobic (1 year), then to anaerobic again. At the beginning all reactors were sampled. From day 57 to 358 only aerobic reactors were sampled. Values were scaled according to values from T = 0. O.D. optical density
Fig. 6Timeline polymers. Mixed treatment started anaerobically, then was switched to aerobic (1 year), then to anaerobic again. At the beginning all reactors were sampled. From day 57 to 358 only aerobic reactors were sampled. Values were scaled according to values from T = 0. O.D. optical density
Fig. 4RI4 vs Substrate group. The shaded area shows the CI at the 95% level. O.D. optical density
Fig. 3RI4 of landfilled waste in each treatment during the experiment