| Literature DB >> 34812598 |
Fatemeh Dehghani Tafti1, Fateme Zare2, Seyed Mohsen Miresmaeili1, Farzaneh Fesahat2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This current survey investigated the role of the Forkhead 3 box protein (foxp3) gene and serum vitamin D levels in women with recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA).Entities:
Keywords: 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3; Forkhead 3 box protein; recurrent spontaneous abortion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34812598 PMCID: PMC9118952 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod ISSN: 1517-5693
Primer sequences used for the real-time polymerase chain reaction.
| Gene | sequence (5’-3’) | Accession No. | PCR product (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| F: ACC TGG AAG AAC GCC ATC | NM_014009.4 | 192 |
|
| F:AAA TCA AGT GGG GCG ATG CTG | NM_001357943.2 | 118 |
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; F, forward; R, reverse; Foxp3, forkhead box P3; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
Demographic data of the study groups.
| Groups | Age (Year) | Number of miscarriages | Successful pregnancies |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 31±3.78 | 4.0±0.9 | 0 |
|
| 31.06±3.43 | 0 | 2.12±0.93 |
Data are presented as mean ±S.D.
Case; Recurrent spontaneous abortion, Control; Healthy fertile women
Figure 1Comparison of foxp3 gene expression in cells obtained from blood samples of women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion (case) and healthy fertile women (controls) There was no significant fold change in foxp3 mRNA levels between case and control groups (p value=0.16, Mean ± SEM: 16.87±13.11 versus 5.26±1.39, respectively).
Correlation between Vitamin D and FOXP3 expression in case and control groups.
| Groups | Variable | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| R=-0.25 |
|
| R=0.49 |
Foxp3, forkhead box P3. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used.
Figure 2Comparison of vitamin D in serum from blood samples of women with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion (case) and healthy fertile women (controls) There was a significantly lower level of vitamin D in the serum samples of case group subjects compared to controls (p value ≤0.001, Mean ± SEM: 21.39±1.94 versus 36.84±3.97, respectively).