Ben Van Calster1, Alexandra Benachi2, Kypros H Nicolaides3, Eduard Gratacos4, Christoph Berg5, Nicola Persico6, Glenn J Gardener7, Michael Belfort8, Yves Ville9, Greg Ryan10, Anthony Johnson11, Haruhiko Sago12, Przemysław Kosiński13, Pietro Bagolan14, Tim Van Mieghem15, Philip L J DeKoninck16, Francesca M Russo17, Stuart B Hooper18, Jan A Deprest19. 1. Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; EPI-center, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Hospital Antoine Béclère, Université Paris Saclay, Clamart, France. 3. King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. 4. Hospital Clinic and Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain. 5. University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 6. Hospital Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. 7. Mater Mother's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. 8. Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine Houston, TX. 9. Hospital Necker, Paris, France. 10. Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 11. Children's Hermann Memorial Hospital, Houston, TX. 12. National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. 13. First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 14. Medical and Surgical Department of the Fetus-Newborn-Infant, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Research Institute, Rome, Italy. 15. Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 16. Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 17. Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Clinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 18. The Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute for Medical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 19. Department of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Woman and Child, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Clinical Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Institute for Women's Health, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jan.deprest@uzleuven.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Two randomized controlled trials compared the neonatal and infant outcomes after fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with expectant prenatal management in fetuses with severe and moderate isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia, respectively. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was carried out at 27+0 to 29+6 weeks' gestation (referred to as "early") for severe and at 30+0 to 31+6 weeks ("late") for moderate hypoplasia. The reported absolute increase in the survival to discharge was 13% (95% confidence interval, -1 to 28; P=.059) and 25% (95% confidence interval, 6-46; P=.0091) for moderate and severe hypoplasia. OBJECTIVE: Data from the 2 trials were pooled to study the heterogeneity of the treatment effect by observed over expected lung-to-head ratio and explore the effect of gestational age at balloon insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Individual participant data from the 2 trials were reanalyzed. Women were assessed between 2008 and 2020 at 14 experienced fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion centers and were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either expectant management or fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion. All received standardized postnatal management. The combined data involved 287 patients (196 with moderate hypoplasia and 91 with severe hypoplasia). The primary endpoint was survival to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. The secondary endpoints were survival to 6 months of age, survival to 6 months without oxygen supplementation, and gestational age at live birth. Penalized regression was used with the following covariates: intervention (fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion vs expectant), early balloon insertion (yes vs no), observed over expected lung-to-head ratio, liver herniation (yes vs no), and trial (severe vs moderate). The interaction between intervention and the observed over expected lung-to-head ratio was evaluated to study treatment effect heterogeneity. RESULTS: For survival to discharge, the adjusted odds ratio of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.01; P=.031). The additional effect of early balloon insertion was highly uncertain (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-3.91; P=.370). When combining these 2 effects, the adjusted odds ratio of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with early balloon insertion was 2.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-6.49). The results for survival to 6 months and survival to 6 months without oxygen dependence were comparable. The gestational age at delivery was on average 1.7 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.3) following fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with late insertion and 3.2 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.1) following fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with early insertion compared with expectant management. There was no evidence that the effect of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion depended on the observed over expected lung-to-head ratio for any of the endpoints. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion increases survival for both moderate and severe lung hypoplasia. The difference between the results for the Tracheal Occlusion To Accelerate Lung growth trials, when considered apart, may be because of the difference in the time point of balloon insertion. However, the effect of the time point of balloon insertion could not be robustly assessed because of a small sample size and the confounding effect of disease severity. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with early balloon insertion in particular strongly increases the risk for preterm delivery.
BACKGROUND: Two randomized controlled trials compared the neonatal and infant outcomes after fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with expectant prenatal management in fetuses with severe and moderate isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia, respectively. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was carried out at 27+0 to 29+6 weeks' gestation (referred to as "early") for severe and at 30+0 to 31+6 weeks ("late") for moderate hypoplasia. The reported absolute increase in the survival to discharge was 13% (95% confidence interval, -1 to 28; P=.059) and 25% (95% confidence interval, 6-46; P=.0091) for moderate and severe hypoplasia. OBJECTIVE: Data from the 2 trials were pooled to study the heterogeneity of the treatment effect by observed over expected lung-to-head ratio and explore the effect of gestational age at balloon insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Individual participant data from the 2 trials were reanalyzed. Women were assessed between 2008 and 2020 at 14 experienced fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion centers and were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either expectant management or fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion. All received standardized postnatal management. The combined data involved 287 patients (196 with moderate hypoplasia and 91 with severe hypoplasia). The primary endpoint was survival to discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit. The secondary endpoints were survival to 6 months of age, survival to 6 months without oxygen supplementation, and gestational age at live birth. Penalized regression was used with the following covariates: intervention (fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion vs expectant), early balloon insertion (yes vs no), observed over expected lung-to-head ratio, liver herniation (yes vs no), and trial (severe vs moderate). The interaction between intervention and the observed over expected lung-to-head ratio was evaluated to study treatment effect heterogeneity. RESULTS: For survival to discharge, the adjusted odds ratio of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion was 1.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.01; P=.031). The additional effect of early balloon insertion was highly uncertain (adjusted odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-3.91; P=.370). When combining these 2 effects, the adjusted odds ratio of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with early balloon insertion was 2.73 (95% confidence interval, 1.15-6.49). The results for survival to 6 months and survival to 6 months without oxygen dependence were comparable. The gestational age at delivery was on average 1.7 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.3) following fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with late insertion and 3.2 weeks earlier (95% confidence interval, 2.3-4.1) following fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with early insertion compared with expectant management. There was no evidence that the effect of fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion depended on the observed over expected lung-to-head ratio for any of the endpoints. CONCLUSION: This analysis suggests that fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion increases survival for both moderate and severe lung hypoplasia. The difference between the results for the Tracheal Occlusion To Accelerate Lung growth trials, when considered apart, may be because of the difference in the time point of balloon insertion. However, the effect of the time point of balloon insertion could not be robustly assessed because of a small sample size and the confounding effect of disease severity. Fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion with early balloon insertion in particular strongly increases the risk for preterm delivery.
Authors: Augusto Zani; Wendy K Chung; Jan Deprest; Matthew T Harting; Tim Jancelewicz; Shaun M Kunisaki; Neil Patel; Lina Antounians; Pramod S Puligandla; Richard Keijzer Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Oluyinka O Olutoye Ii; Walker D Short; Jamie Gilley; J D Hammond Ii; Michael A Belfort; Timothy C Lee; Alice King; Jimmy Espinoza; Luc Joyeux; Krithika Lingappan; Jason P Gleghorn; Sundeep G Keswani Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.569
Authors: Suzan Cochius-den Otter; Jan A Deprest; Laurent Storme; Anne Greenough; Dick Tibboel Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 3.569