| Literature DB >> 34808069 |
Yunhui Hu1, Jia Sun1, Tongxing Wang1, Hairong Wang1, Chunlai Zhao1, Wenjia Wang1, Kaijing Yan1,2,3, Xijun Yan1,2,3, He Sun1,2,3.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Previous studies indicate that compound Danshen Dripping Pill (CDDP) improves the adaptation to high-altitude exposure. However, its mechanism of action is not clear.Entities:
Keywords: Hypobaric hypoxia; NF-κB; Nrf2; inflammation; traditional Chinese medicine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34808069 PMCID: PMC8635678 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2021.1998139
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Figure 1.Workflow for a hypobaric hypoxic model establishment and experimental design of treatment for each group.
Figure 2.Effect of CDDP on the alleviation of hypobaric hypoxia symptoms (A) and improvement of SO2 (B) in people exposed to hypobaric hypoxia and summary of bias risks: the reviewers’ judgement of risk for each bias item in each included study.
Figure 3.CDDP alleviates hypobaric hypoxia-induced tissue damage and improves tissue oxygenation. HE staining of rat lung (A) and heart (B) sections. Representative pictures from three randomly selected fields are shown. Black bar represents 50 μm. (C) Expression level of blood NT-proBNP. Statistical comparisons were made against the model group. Data indicate the average ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05. (D) Oxygen dissociation curve determined by arterial blood gas analysis and calculated according to the Hill equation. Arterial blood gas values and oxygen-dissociation curve parameters are fully described in Table 1.
Arterial blood-gas values and oxygen-dissociation curve parameters.
| Experiment groups | PO2 | SO2 |
| logK | P50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 87.67 ± 4.84 | 97.00 ± 0.63* | 2.99 ± 0.15** | 4.29 ± 0.37** | 27.19 ± 3.16** |
| Model | 73.33 ± 15.91 | 89.83 ± 5.91 | 3.479 ± 0.20 | –5.45 ± 0.49 | 37.23 ± 4.30 |
| CDDP-low | 90.83 ± 12.07 | 95.33 ± 3.78 | 3.33 ± 0.25 | –5.11 ± 0.62 | 34.28 ± 5.51 |
| CDDP-high | 93.67 ± 6.80* | 97.00 ± 0.89* | 3.13 ± 0.18** | 4.65 ± 0.43** | 30.25 ± 3.72** |
| ACTZ | 68.67 ± 33.13 | 80.33 ± 18.73 | 3.37 ± 0.15 | –5.20 ± 0.35 | 35.08 ± 3.10 |
All statistical comparisons were made against the model group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Figure 4.CDDP attenuates hypobaric hypoxia-induced oxidative stress. Blood, lung and heart samples collected from rats have conducted the following assays. (A) ROS levels determined by the assay kit. (B) Serum TAOC, SOD and GPX1 levels detected by the assay kit. Samples from every rat were detected separately. Data indicate the average ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. n = 6 of each group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5.CDDP alleviates inflammation and blood viscosity in hypobaric hypoxia-stimulated rats. Determination of inflammatory cytokines concentration by ELISA (A) and D-Dimer levels determined by assay kit (B). (C) Blood hemorheology determined using a blood rheometer (left panel); Red blood cell aggregation index was calculated according to blood hemorheology (right panel). Samples from every rat were detected separately. Data indicate the average ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. n = 6 of each group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 6.(A) Identification of the CDDP-protected targets against hypobaric hypoxia. Lung and heart samples collected from rats were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned for IHC staining using the corresponding antibodies. Representative pictures from three randomly selected fields are shown. Black bar represents 50 μm. (B) Mode of action of CDDP in treating hypobaric hypoxia.