| Literature DB >> 34807962 |
Nadim Sharif1, Khalid J Alzahrani2, Shamsun Nahar Ahmed1, Rubayet Rayhan Opu1, Nayan Ahmed1, Aeken Talukder1, Raju Nunia1, Mysha Samiha Chowdhury1, Israt Jahan Nodi1, Tama Saha1, Ming Zhang3, Shuvra Kanti Dey1.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a major public health issue globally. Preventive health measures against COVID-19 can reduce the health burden significantly by containing the transmission. A few research have been undertaken on the effectiveness of preventive strategies such as mask use, hand washing, and keeping social distance in preventing COVID-19 transmission. The main aim of this study was to determine the association of the preventive measures with the reduction of transmission of COVID-19 among people. Data was collected during January 06, 2021 to May 10, 2021 from 1690 participants in Bangladesh. A validated questionnaire was used to collect both the online and offline data. Chi-square test and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association among the variables. The prevalence of COVID-19 was 11.5% (195 of 1690) among the population. Age, gender, occupation and monthly income of the participants were significantly associated with the likelihood of following the preventive measures. The risk of infection and death reduced significantly among the participants following preventive measures (p = .001). The odds of incidence was lower among the participants using masks properly (OR: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.43), maintaining social distances (OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.33), avoiding crowded places (OR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.19) and hand shaking (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09-0.41). This study suggests that preventive health measures are significantly associated with the reduction of the risk of infection of COVID-19. Findings from this study will help the policymakers to take appropriate steps to curb the health burden of COVID-19.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34807962 PMCID: PMC8608304 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260287
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study population.
| Variables | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Population | 54.7% (924 of 1690) | 45.3% (766 of 1690) | 100% (1690 of 1690) |
|
| |||
| Below 10 | 66.7% (8 of 12) | 33.3% (4 of 12) | .7% (12 of 1690) |
| 10–19 | 58% (178 of 307) | 42% (129 of 307) | 18.2% (307 of 1690) |
| 20–29 | 56.7% (401 of 708) | 43.3% (307 of 708) | 41.9% (708 of 1690) |
| 30–39 | 57.5% (162 of 282) | 42.5% (120 of 282) | 16.7% (282 of 1690) |
| 40–49 | 57.6% (151 of 262) | 42.4% (111 of 262) | 15.5% (262 of 1690) |
| 50–59 | 64.7% (55 of 85) | 35.3% (30 of 85) | 5% (85 of 1690) |
| Above 60 | 61.8% (21 of 34) | 38.2% (13 of 34) | 2% (34 of 1690) |
|
| |||
| Less than 10 | 59.6% (372 of 624) | 40.1% (252 of 624) | 36.9% (624 of 1690) |
| 10–29 | 54.2% (156 of 288) | 45.8% (132 of 288) | 17% (288 of 1690) |
| 30–49 | 62.6% (67 of 107) | 37.4% (40 of 107) | 6.3% (107 of 1690) |
| 50–79 | 56.2% (18 of 32) | 43.8% (14 of 32) | 1.9% (32 of 1690) |
| More than 80 | 53.8% (21 of 39) | 46.2% (18 of 39) | 2.4% (39 of 1690) |
| No information | 53.7% (322 of 600) | 46.3% (278 of 600) | 35.5% (600 of 1690) |
|
| |||
| Physician | 54% (93 of 172) | 44% (79 of 172) | 10.2% (172 of 1690) |
| Teacher | 59.6% (53 of 89) | 40.4% (36 of 89) | 5.3% (89 of 1690) |
| Researcher | 57.1% (4 of 7) | 42.9% (3 of 7) | 0.4% (7 of 1690) |
| Farmer | 62.5% (217 of 347) | 36.5% (130 of 347) | 20.5% (347 of 1690) |
| Student | 54.9% (456 of 831) | 44.1% (375 of 831) | 49.2% (831 of 1690) |
| Police | 58.3% (35 of 60) | 41.7% (25 of 60) | 3.5% (60 of 1690) |
| Businessman | 56.9% (41 of 72) | 43.1% (31 of 72) | 4.3% (72 of 1690) |
| Others | 60.7% (68 of 112) | 29.3% (54 of 112) | 6.6% (112 of 1690) |
Fig 1Frequency distribution of the study participants and prevalence of COVID-19 in Bangladesh.
Association between the demographic factors and the likelihood of following the preventive measures.
| Variables | Preventive measures ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face mask using | Hand sanitization | Maintaining social distances | Avoiding crowded places | Following lockdown | ||
|
| Male | .001 | .005 | .05 | .028 | .017 |
| Female | .024 | .041 | .004 | .037 | .05 | |
|
| Below 10 | .074 | .84 | .56 | .64 | .89 |
| 10–19 | .48 | .45 | .43 | .04 | .49 | |
| 20–29 | .021 | .05 | .04 | .034 | .53 | |
| 30–39 | .004 | .03 | .03 | .001 | .024 | |
| 40–49 | .024 | .04 | .001 | .05 | .04 | |
| 50–59 | .04 | .001 | .05 | .04 | .06 | |
| Above 60 | .001 | .05 | .03 | .001 | .05 | |
|
| Less than 10 | .07 | .84 | .86 | .054 | .45 |
| 10–29 | .04 | .37 | .63 | .04 | .61 | |
| 30–49 | .05 | .45 | .05 | .05 | .34 | |
| 50–79 | .005 | .05 | .004 | .001 | .05 | |
| More than 80 | .01 | .03 | .034 | .034 | .38 | |
| No information | .08 | .75 | .46 | .82 | .68 | |
|
| Physician | .002 | .01 | .003 | .001 | .03 |
| Teacher | .021 | .04 | .04 | .04 | .14 | |
| Researcher | .05 | .019 | .01 | .34 | .02 | |
| Farmer | .08 | .64 | .37 | .07 | .86 | |
| Student | .074 | .035 | .42 | .64 | .34 | |
| Police | .065 | .74 | .84 | .42 | .75 | |
| Businessman | .03 | .37 | .67 | .16 | .61 | |
| Others | .049 | .57 | .49 | .21 | .47 | |
Chi-square test was performed among the variables (N = 1690). P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Fig 2A. Trends of the participants to use different types of face masks, B. Gender distribution of the practices of using different types of hand sanitizing media, C. Frequency distribution of the practices of hand cleaning among male and female in Bangladesh.
Fig 3Distribution of COVID-19 A. Cases and B. Fatalities in Bangladesh during the second wave, C. Chronology of taken measures by the authorities against COVID-19 during the second wave.
Fig 4Gender-wise changes of the frequency of A. Using face masks, B. Cleaning hands, C. Maintaining social distance and D. Avoiding hand shaking among the participants with the progress of the second wave.
Measures of association among the preventive measures and COVID-19 related health outcomes.
| Variables | Reduction of COVID-19 related outcomes ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Practices | Parameter | New cases | New fatalities | Hospitalization | Admission to ICU |
|
| Appropriately | .001 | .01 | .02 | .05 |
| Moderately | .26 | .04 | .047 | .04 | |
| Not using | .84 | .72 | .91 | .47 | |
|
| Appropriately | .005 | .005 | .02 | .05 |
| Moderately | .034 | .03 | .04 | .02 | |
| Not using | .67 | .72 | .31 | .51 | |
|
| Appropriately | .02 | .001 | .006 | .05 |
| Not using | .89 | .43 | .73 | .62 | |
|
| Appropriately | .03 | .01 | .05 | .001 |
| Moderately | .05 | .06 | .05 | .025 | |
| No | .93 | .34 | .82 | .38 | |
|
| Yes | .05 | .01 | .05 | .04 |
| No | .42 | .67 | .52 | .39 | |
|
| Yes | .001 | .005 | .01 | .05 |
| No | .38 | .27 | .64 | .51 | |
|
| Yes | .05 | .04 | .02 | .05 |
| No | .54 | .47 | .35 | .62 | |
|
| Yes | .002 | .03 | .05 | .04 |
| No | .24 | .54 | .67 | .98 | |
Chi-square test was performed among the variables (N = 1690). P value < .05 was considered statistically significant.
Logistic regression analyses among the preventive measures and different parameters of COVID-19 pandemic.
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Gender | 1.91 (1.13–2.74) | .005 |
| Age | 2.93 (1.95–4.24) | .002 |
| Better access to health facilities | 0.71 (0.39–1.61) | .486 |
| High income | 1.23 (0.46–2.67) | .001 |
|
| ||
| Wearing masks outside | 0.02 (0.01–0.43) | .041 |
| Using hand sanitizers/soap/hand wash | 0.18 (0.09–0.93) | .013 |
| Maintaining social distance outside | 0.04 (0.01–0.33) | .005 |
| Reduced outside activity | 0.07 (0.02–0.19) | .001 |
| Reduced hand shaking | 0.17 (0.09–0.41) | .017 |
| Using PPE and hand gloves (health professionals) | 0.10 (0.04–0.63) | .341 |
| Avoiding inter-city movement | 0.39 (0.75–2.30) | .001 |
| Following government guidelines for COVID-19 pandemic | 0.41 (0.12–0.89) | .049 |
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Age: >40 years vs. <40 years | 2.47 (1.14–4.74) | .004 |
| Residence: Urban areas vs. village areas | 2.74 (1.43–5.06) | .037 |
| Better access to health facilities vs. worse access to health facilities | 0.43 (0.12–0.98) | .647 |
| High income vs. low income | 1.76 (0.91–3.87) | .001 |
| Mask users vs non-users | 0.04 (0.02–0.43) | .005 |
| Keeping social distance vs no social distance | 0.23 (0.17–0.91) | .001 |
| Hand cleaning vs no cleaning | 0.46 (0.27–0.97) | .049 |
P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. OR- odds ratio, CI- Confidence intervals