| Literature DB >> 34807924 |
Sondes Haddad-Boubaker1, Cherif Ben Hamda2, Kais Ghedira2, Khaoula Mefteh1,3, Aida Bouafsoun1,3, Ilhem Boutiba-Ben Boubaker4,5, Amin Slim4, Khaled Menif6, Henda Triki1, Mohamed Ali Ben Hadj Kacem6, Hanen Smaoui1,3.
Abstract
Rhinoviruses (RV) are a major cause of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) in children, with high genotypic diversity in different regions. However, RV type diversity remains unknown in several regions of the world. In this study, the genetic variability of the frequently circulating RV types in Northern Tunisia was investigated, using phylogenetic and phylogeographic analyses with a specific focus on the most frequent RV types: RV-A101 and RV-C45. This study concerned 13 RV types frequently circulating in Northern Tunisia. They were obtained from respiratory samples collected in 271 pediatric SARI cases, between September 2015 and November 2017. A total of 37 RV VP4-VP2 sequences, selected among a total of 49 generated sequences, was compared to 359 sequences from different regions of the world. Evolutionary analysis of RV-A101 and RV-C45 showed high genetic relationship between different Tunisian strains and Malaysian strains. RV-A101 and C45 progenitor viruses' dates were estimated in 1981 and 1995, respectively. Since the early 2000s, the two types had a wide spread throughout the world. Phylogenetic analyses of other frequently circulating strains showed significant homology of Tunisian strains from the same epidemic period, in contrast with earlier strains. The genetic relatedness of RV-A101 and RV-C45 might result from an introduction of viruses from different clades followed by local dissemination rather than a local persistence of an endemic clades along seasons. International traffic may play a key role in the spread of RV-A101, RV-C45, and other RVs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34807924 PMCID: PMC8608298 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Description of Tunisian sequences investigated.
| Sequence name | Date of isolation | Accession number | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| HRV38.Tun.02.2016 | Feb/2016 | MN583163 | RV-A101 |
| HRV37.Tun.03.2016 | Mar/2016 | MN583162 | |
| HRV04.Tun.03.2016 | Mar/2016 | MN583129 | |
| HRV06.Tun.08.2016 | Aug/2016 | MN583131 | |
| HRV25.Tun.09.2016 | Sep/2016 | MN583150 | |
| HRV26.Tun.10.2016 | Nov/2016 | MN583151 | |
| HRV29.Tun.01.2017 | Jan/2017 | MN583154 | |
| HRV30.Tun.12.2016 | Dec/2016 | MN583155 | RV-A32 |
| HRV10.Tun.01.2017 | Jan/2017 | MN583135 | |
| HRV14.Tun.04.2017 | Apr/2017 | MN583139 | |
| HRV35.Tun.09.2015 | Sep/2015 | MN583160 | RV-A12 |
| HRV36.Tun.01.2017 | Jan/2017 | MN583161 | |
| HRV11.Tun.02.2017 | Feb/2017 | MN583136 | |
| HRV01.Tun.09.2015 | Sep/2015 | MN583126 | RV-A15 |
| HRV02.Tun.10.2015 | Oct/2015 | MN583127 | |
| HRV03.Tun.11.2015 | Nov/2015 | MN583128 | RV-A78 |
| HRV45.Tun.10.2017 | Oct/2017 | MN583170 | |
| HRV17.Tun.07.2017 | Jul/2017 | MN583142 | RV-A16 |
| HRV34.Tun.11.2017 | Nov/2017 | MN583159 | |
| HRV20.Tun.02.2016 | Feb/2016 | MN583145 | RV-A19 |
| HRV24.Tun.08.2016 | Aug/2016 | MN583149 | |
| HRV28.Tun.10.2015 | Oct/2015 | MN583153 | RV-A89 |
| HRV22.Tun.04.2016 | Apr/2016 | MN583147 | |
| HRV13.Tun.03.2017 | Mar/2017 | MN583138 | RV-C45 |
| HRV42.Tun.03.2017 | Mar/2017 | MN583167 | |
| HRV48.Tun.03.2017 | Mar/2017 | MN583173 | |
| HRV16.Tun.05.2017 | May/2017 | MN583141 | |
| HRV44.Tun.06.2017 | Jun/2017 | MN583169 | |
| HRV39.Tun.06.2017 | Jun/2017 | MN583164 | |
| HRV08.Tun.10.2016 | Oct/2016 | MN583133 | RV-C43 |
| HRV27.Tun.10.2016 | Oct/2016 | MN583152 | |
| HRV46.Tun.10.2016 | Oct/2016 | MN583171 | |
| HRV07.Tun.09.2016 | Sep/2016 | MN583132 | RV-C53 |
| HRV43.Tun.05.2017 | May/2017 | MN583168 | |
| HRV32.Tun.08.2016 | Jul/2016 | MN583157 | RV-B72 |
| HRV31.Tun.12.2016 | Sep/2016 | MN583156 | RV-B42 |
| HRV49.Tun.03.2017 | Mar/2017 | MN583174 | RV-B48 |
Fitting models bayes factors and HPD95% related to RV-A101.
| Clock/Tree prior | Constant | Exponential | Expansion | Bayesian | Logistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size | Growth | Growth | Skyline | Growth | |
| Random local | -2 048,50 | -2 049,50 | -2 048,52 | -2 038,93 | -1 513,96 |
| 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1976,1982) | 1981(1977,1982) | |
| Strict | -2 048,11 | -2 049,32 | -2 049,10 | -2 041,37 | -1 555,08 |
| 1980(1976,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1976,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | |
| Uncorrelated Relaxed | -2 051,79 | -2 055,36 | -2 055,15 | -2 042,35 | -1 650,94 |
| 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) | 1980(1977,1982) |
Fitting models bayes factors and HPD95% related to RV-C45.
| Clock/Tree prior | Constant | Exponential | Expansion | Bayesian | Logistic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size | Growth | Growth | Skyline | Growth | |
| Random local | -1 785,53 | -1 788,06 | -1 785,80 | -1 784,33 | -1 788,40 |
| 1995(1989,1996) | 1979(1961,1991) | 1979(1961,1991) | 1982(1942, 1996) | 1982(1963,1999) | |
| Strict | -1 792,07 | -1 794,26 | -1 794,06 | -1 795,69 | -1 791,73 |
| 1943(1796,1977) | 1947(1913,1975) | 1944(1895,1971) | 1950(1767, 1977) | 1949(1928,1977) | |
| Uncorrelated Relaxed | -1 781,67 | -1 783,83 | -1 781,15 | -1 778,40 | -1 783,60 |
| 1993(1957,1996) | 1993(1996,1987) | 1993(1996,1987) | 1995(1976, 1996) | 1995(1992,1996) |
Fig 1Maximum clade credibility (MCC) trees for RV-A101 (A) and RV-C45 (B). The branches are colored according to the most probable ancestor location of their descendant nodes. Tunisian RV-A101 and RV-C45 strains are highlighted in a Cyan and Purple rectangular, respectively.
Fig 2Bayesian skyline plot of RV-A101 (A) and RV-C45 (B). Bayesian skyline plots of the RV-A101 (A) and RV-C45 (B) genes show the changes in effective population size (genetic diversity) through time. The thick solid line indicates the median value, and the blue area is the 95% Highest Posterior Density (HPD) of the genetic diversity estimates.
Fig 3Temporal dynamics of RV-A101 (Panel. A) and RV-C45 (Panel. B) and spatial dispersal in the world. Google Earth (https://earth.google.com). The figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.
Fig 4Molecular typing of Tunisian RV strains obtained during the study period (2015–2017).
A. Molecular typing of RV-A strains: A1. RV-A12, A2. RV-A78, A3. RV-A32, A4. RV-A89, A5. RV-A15, A6. RV-A16, A7. RV-A19; B. Molecular typing of RV-B strains: B1. RV-B72, B2. RV-B48, B3. RV-B42; C. Molecular typing of RV-C strains: C1. RV-C53, C2, RV-C43. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor joining method. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6. Investigated Tunisian sequences are indicated in bold and Red; The most related sequences to investigated ones are indicated in bold and Green; Previously available Tunisian are indicated in bold in Blue.