OBJECTIVES: Although racial disparities are well documented for common gynecologic surgical procedures, few studies have assessed racial disparities in the surgical treatment of vaginal prolapse. This study aimed to compare the use of obliterative procedures for the treatment of vaginal prolapse across racial and ethnic groups. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of surgical cases from 2010 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a nationally validated database. Cases were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for potential confounders selected a priori. RESULTS: We identified 45,865 surgical cases, of which 10% involved an obliterative procedure. In the unadjusted model, non-Hispanic Asian and non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to undergo an obliterative procedure compared with non-Hispanic White patients (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.4 [2.1-2.7] and 1.2 [1.03-1.3], respectively). These relative risks were largely unchanged when controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and concurrent hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although both obliterative and reconstructive procedures have their respective risks and benefits, the proportion of patients undergoing each procedure differs by race and ethnicity. It is unclear whether such disparities may be attributable to differences in preference or inequity in care.
OBJECTIVES: Although racial disparities are well documented for common gynecologic surgical procedures, few studies have assessed racial disparities in the surgical treatment of vaginal prolapse. This study aimed to compare the use of obliterative procedures for the treatment of vaginal prolapse across racial and ethnic groups. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of surgical cases from 2010 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, a nationally validated database. Cases were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Modified Poisson regression was used to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for potential confounders selected a priori. RESULTS: We identified 45,865 surgical cases, of which 10% involved an obliterative procedure. In the unadjusted model, non-Hispanic Asian and non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to undergo an obliterative procedure compared with non-Hispanic White patients (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.4 [2.1-2.7] and 1.2 [1.03-1.3], respectively). These relative risks were largely unchanged when controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and concurrent hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although both obliterative and reconstructive procedures have their respective risks and benefits, the proportion of patients undergoing each procedure differs by race and ethnicity. It is unclear whether such disparities may be attributable to differences in preference or inequity in care.
Authors: Lynda H Powell; Peter Meyer; Gerson Weiss; Karen A Matthews; Nanette Santoro; John F Randolph; Miriam Schocken; Joan Skurnick; Marcia G Ory; Kim Sutton-Tyrrell Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2005 Jul-Aug
Authors: Jeanette S Brown; L Elaine Waetjen; Leslee L Subak; David H Thom; Stephen Van den Eeden; Eric Vittinghoff Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Sonya B Borrero; Matthew F Reeves; Eleanor B Schwarz; James E Bost; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Denise J Jamieson; Steven C Kaufman; Caroline Costello; Susan D Hillis; Polly A Marchbanks; Herbert B Peterson Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 7.661