Literature DB >> 34807737

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Their Work's Intersection with Clinical Ethics.

Meaghann S Weaver1,2, Renee D Boss3,4, Myra J Christopher5, Tamryn F Gray6, Stephanie Harman7, Vanessa N Madrigal8, Kelly N Michelson9,10, Erin T Paquette9,10,11, Rebecca D Pentz12,13, Sara Scarlet14, Connie M Ulrich15,16, Jennifer K Walter17,18,19.   

Abstract

Palliative care (PC) subspecialists and clinical ethics consultants often engage in parallel work, as both function primarily as interprofessional consultancy services called upon in complex clinical scenarios and challenging circumstances. Both practices utilize active listening, goals-based communication, conflict mediation or mitigation, and values explorations as care modalities. In this set of tips created by an interprofessional team of ethicists, intensivists, a surgeon, an attorney, and pediatric and adult PC nurses and physicians, we aim to describe some paradigmatic clinical challenges for which partnership may improve collaborative, comprehensive care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical ethics; ethics; health care ethics; palliative care; teamwork

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34807737      PMCID: PMC9206474          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  25 in total

1.  Addressing Palliative Care Clinician Burnout in Organizations: A Workforce Necessity, an Ethical Imperative.

Authors:  Krista L Harrison; Elizabeth Dzeng; Christine S Ritchie; Tait D Shanafelt; Arif H Kamal; Janet H Bull; Jon C Tilburt; Keith M Swetz
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  The limits of parental authority?

Authors:  Barry Lyons
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Interdisciplinary or Interprofessional: Why Terminology in Teamwork Matters to Hospice and Palliative Care.

Authors:  Jennifer B Seaman; Joshua R Lakin; Elizabeth Anderson; Rachelle Bernacki; Carey Candrian; Valerie T Cotter; Susan DeSanto-Madeya; Andrew S Epstein; Allison Kestenbaum; Seiko Izumi; Bridget Sumser; Jennifer Tjia; Caroline J Hurd
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Family Experiences Deciding For and Against Pediatric Home Ventilation.

Authors:  Renee D Boss; Carrie M Henderson; Jessica C Raisanen; Nicholas A Jabre; Kelly Shipman; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Investigating health disparities and disproportionality in child maltreatment reporting: 2002-2006.

Authors:  Natalie A Cort; Catherine Cerulli; Hua He
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug

Review 6.  Ethics, Emotions, and the Skills of Talking About Progressing Disease With Terminally Ill Adolescents: A Review.

Authors:  Abby R Rosenberg; Joanne Wolfe; Lori Wiener; Maureen Lyon; Chris Feudtner
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 16.193

7.  Parental authority and pediatric bioethical decision making.

Authors:  Mark J Cherry
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2010-09-16

8.  Nature of conflict in the care of pediatric intensive care patients with prolonged stay.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Jeffrey P Burns; Michelle M Mello; Ann Louise Puopolo; Robert D Truog; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family's role in medical decision-making.

Authors:  Anita Ho
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2008-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.