Literature DB >> 34807641

Growth trajectories of cognitive and motor control in adolescence: How much is development and how much is practice?

Séverine Lannoy1, Adolf Pfefferbaum1, Anne-Pascale Le Berre1, Wesley K Thompson2, Ty Brumback3, Tilman Schulte4, Kilian M Pohl1, Michael D De Bellis5, Kate B Nooner6, Fiona C Baker4, Devin Prouty4, Ian M Colrain4, Bonnie J Nagel7, Sandra A Brown2, Duncan B Clark7, Susan F Tapert7, Edith V Sullivan1, Eva M Müller-Oehring1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Executive control continues to develop throughout adolescence and is vulnerable to alcohol use. Although longitudinal assessment is ideal for tracking executive function development and onset of alcohol use, prior testing experience must be distinguished from developmental trajectories.
METHOD: We used the Stroop Match-to-Sample task to examine the improvement of processing speed and specific cognitive and motor control over 4 years in 445 adolescents. The twice-minus-once-tested method was used and expanded to four test sessions to delineate prior experience (i.e., learning) from development. A General Additive Model evaluated the predictive value of age and sex on executive function development and potential influences of alcohol use on development.
RESULTS: Results revealed strong learning between the first two assessments. Adolescents significantly improved their speed processing over 4 years. Compared with boys, girls enhanced ability to control cognitive interference and motor reactions. Finally, the influence of alcohol use initiation was tested over 4 years for development in 110 no/low, 110 moderate/heavy age- and sex-matched drinkers; alcohol effects were not detected in the matched groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of learning effects is crucial for examining developmental changes longitudinally. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34807641     DOI: 10.1037/neu0000771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  3 in total

1.  Prior test experience confounds longitudinal tracking of adolescent cognitive and motor development.

Authors:  Edith V Sullivan; Wesley K Thompson; Ty Brumback; Devin Prouty; Susan F Tapert; Sandra A Brown; Michael D De Bellis; Kate B Nooner; Fiona C Baker; Ian M Colrain; Duncan B Clark; Bonnie J Nagel; Kilian M Pohl; Adolf Pfefferbaum
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.612

2.  Age-related changes and longitudinal stability of individual differences in ABCD Neurocognition measures.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin; Monica Luciana; Marie Banich; Deanna Barch; James M Bjork; Marybel R Gonzalez; Raul Gonzalez; Frank Haist; Joanna Jacobus; Krista Lisdahl; Erin McGlade; Bruce McCandliss; Bonnie Nagel; Sara Jo Nixon; Susan Tapert; James T Kennedy; Wesley Thompson
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.811

3.  A Longitudinal Examination of Alcohol-Related Blackouts as a Predictor of Changes in Learning, Memory, and Executive Function in Adolescents.

Authors:  Sara A Lorkiewicz; Fiona C Baker; Eva M Müller-Oehring; Amie Haas; Robert Wickham; Stephanie A Sassoon; Duncan B Clark; Kate B Nooner; Susan F Tapert; Sandra A Brown; Tilman Schulte
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.157

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.