Eilis Fitzgerald1, Jennifer Mannion2, Sinead Boran2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland. mseilisfitzgerald@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Torus fractures, also known as buckle fractures, of the distal radius are a very common reason for presentation to emergency departments. Traditional approaches to their management involved immobilisation in a circumferential cast but the evidence now supports the use of removable splints with or without radiological and clinical follow-up. Unfortunately current practice conflicts with the evidence base and there is no guideline which highlights all the evidence as one clear, concise management protocol. METHODS: An online review of Pubmed, EMBASE, Biomed, and the Cochrane library using keyword searches combining "radius", "torus", "buckle" and "fracture" was performed. All prospective, retrospective or randomised trials involving the management of distal radius torus fractures in patients aged 0-18 years were included. Our outcomes focused on 5 aspects of patient care: immobilisation method and duration, clinical follow-up, radiological follow-up and the use of diagnostic ultrasound. RESULTS: The initial search identified 143 papers which following application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria 21 articles were deemed eligible. A Cochrane review and 8 systematic reviews were also identified and manually searched for missed articles and this yielded a further 3 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Current research indicates that torus fractures should be managed with a removable splint supplied in A&E and worn for 3 weeks. There is no need for fracture clinic follow-up or repeat radiological imaging once patients are given adequate information at the time of diagnosis. This would represent both an economical and resource saving for patients, parents and the health service.
BACKGROUND: Torus fractures, also known as buckle fractures, of the distal radius are a very common reason for presentation to emergency departments. Traditional approaches to their management involved immobilisation in a circumferential cast but the evidence now supports the use of removable splints with or without radiological and clinical follow-up. Unfortunately current practice conflicts with the evidence base and there is no guideline which highlights all the evidence as one clear, concise management protocol. METHODS: An online review of Pubmed, EMBASE, Biomed, and the Cochrane library using keyword searches combining "radius", "torus", "buckle" and "fracture" was performed. All prospective, retrospective or randomised trials involving the management of distal radius torus fractures in patients aged 0-18 years were included. Our outcomes focused on 5 aspects of patient care: immobilisation method and duration, clinical follow-up, radiological follow-up and the use of diagnostic ultrasound. RESULTS: The initial search identified 143 papers which following application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria 21 articles were deemed eligible. A Cochrane review and 8 systematic reviews were also identified and manually searched for missed articles and this yielded a further 3 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Current research indicates that torus fractures should be managed with a removable splint supplied in A&E and worn for 3 weeks. There is no need for fracture clinic follow-up or repeat radiological imaging once patients are given adequate information at the time of diagnosis. This would represent both an economical and resource saving for patients, parents and the health service.