| Literature DB >> 34805420 |
Mitchell A Johnson1, Kunbo Park1, Divya Talwar1, Kathleen J Maguire1, J Todd R Lawrence1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reports detailing the rates of radiographic healing after treatment of talar osteochondritis dissecans (TOCD) remain scarce. There is also a paucity of data characterizing treatment outcomes and the risk factors associated with poor outcomes in children with TOCD.Entities:
Keywords: OCD; ankle; child; osteochondritis dissecans; pediatric; treatment
Year: 2021 PMID: 34805420 PMCID: PMC8597075 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211051769
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop J Sports Med ISSN: 2325-9671
Figure 1.Representative radiographic appearance of patient with a medial talar dome osteochondritis dissecans lesion (A) before treatment and (B) 1 year after surgical arthroscopy and drilling.
Patient and Lesion Characteristics
| Variable | Overall | Radiographic Healing at 1-y Follow-up |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Incomplete | |||
| No. of patients | 74 | 40 (54) | 34 (46) | |
| No. of TOCD lesions | 92 | 43 (47) | 49 (53) | |
| Sex | .615 | |||
| Female | 56 (61) | 25 (45) | 31 (55) | |
| Male | 36 (39) | 18 (50) | 18 (50) | |
| Age, y | 13.1 ± 2.7 | 12.4 ± 2.1 | 13.7 ± 2.6 |
|
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.8 ± 5.7 | 21.0 ± 5.9 | 24.1 ± 6.1 |
|
| Laterality of the lesion | .383 | |||
| Left | 40 (44) | 19 (48) | 21 (53) | |
| Right | 52 (57) | 20 (39) | 32 (62) | |
| Lesion size, mm | ||||
| AP | 7.0 ± 2.4 | 7.1 ± 2.7 | 6.9 ± 2.1 | .115 |
| Lateral | 9.3 ± 3.6 | 9.0 ± 3.9 | 9.6 ± 3.3 | .057 |
| Depth | 4.9 ± 2.2 | 4.5 ± 1.8 | 5.2 ± 2.6 | .112 |
| Location on coronal plane |
| |||
| Medial | 60 (65) | 26 (43) | 34 (57) | |
| Lateral | 20 (22) | 3 (15) | 17 (85) | |
| Central | 14 (15) | 10 (71) | 4 (29) | |
| Location on sagittal plane | .702 | |||
| Anterior | 3 (3) | 1 (33) | 2 (67) | |
| Posterior | 4 (4) | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | |
| Middle | 84 (91) | 36 (43) | 48 (57) | |
| Physeal status |
| |||
| Open | 45 (49) | 27 (60) | 18 (40) | |
| Closed | 47 (51) | 16 (34) | 31 (66) | |
| Initial Berndt and Harty stage | .899 | |||
| 1 | 23 (25) | 11 (48) | 12 (52) | |
| 2 | 29 (32) | 15 (52) | 14 (48) | |
| 3 | 26 (28) | 11 (42) | 15 (58) | |
| 4 | 14 (15) | 6 (43) | 8 (57) | |
| Initial treatment type | .413 | |||
| Nonoperative | 34 (37) | 14 (41) | 20 (59) | |
| Operative | 58 (63) | 29 (50) | 29 (50) | |
| Berndt and Harty clinical grade at 1-y follow-up |
| |||
| Poor | 20 (22) | 4 (20) | 16 (80) | |
| Fair | 32 (35) | 13 (41) | 19 (59) | |
| Good | 40 (44) | 26 (65) | 14 (35) | |
Data are reported as mean ± SD or n (%). Bolded P values indicate a statistically significant difference between study groups (P < .05). AP, anteroposterior; BMI, body mass index; TOCD, talar osteochndritis dissecans.
Figure 2.Receiver operating characteristic curve for the multivariable model that included age at evaluation, body mass index, and initial treatment approach (nonsurgical vs surgical).
Figure 3.(A) Nomogram used to predict complete radiographic healing at the 1-year follow-up on the basis of a patient’s age, body mass index (BMI), and the type of initial treatment. To calculate the probability of complete radiographic healing, straight vertical lines should be drawn from the points corresponding to the patient’s age, BMI, and initial treatment types on the respective row corresponding to the data. Next, record the values that each of these vertical lines provide at their points of intersection on the row labeled “Score.” All recorded values should be summed. (B) This sum is then matched with a value on the line labeled “Total Score.” The corresponding percentages on the line immediately above the total score line indicate the patient-specific probability of achieving complete radiographic healing at the 1-year follow-up.
Figure 4.Example of nomogram-predicted probability of complete radiographic healing at 1 year in a patient from our series based on the patient’s age, body mass index (BMI), and initial treatment modality. The patient did not have complete healing at the 1-year follow-up.