Celia P Kaplan1,2, Leah Karliner1,2, Andrew Lee3, Jennifer Livaudais-Toman1, Jeffrey A Tice1, Elissa Ozanne4. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 2. Multiethnic Health Equity Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Population Health Science, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer risk assessment tools and risk reduction strategies have advanced significantly over the past few decades but are underutilized in practice, due in part to limited acceptability by patients and physicians. We implemented a tablet-based Breast Cancer Risk Education Intervention (BreastCARE) tailored towards increasing patients' knowledge about their individual risk of developing breast cancer, increasing patient-physician discussion of breast cancer risk reduction practices, and increasing participation in recommended screening. METHODS: We surveyed patients and physicians who received the BreastCARE intervention and analyzed their satisfaction and acceptability of the intervention. We compared patient satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity and used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the effect of race/ethnicity on measures of patient satisfaction with the tablet-based risk assessment and with the breast cancer risk report. We also compared measures of physician satisfaction by resident vs. attending/NP status. Finally, we identified patients' and physicians' suggestions for implementation. RESULTS: Overall, both patients and physicians were highly satisfied with BreastCARE, with some variation by patient race/ethnicity and breast cancer risk status. The risk assessment tool and accompanying risk report helped transmit complex information in an efficient way. CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-administered risk assessment with a health education component at the point of care is acceptable for both patients and physicians, and represents a novel approach to facilitating health promotion. This risk assessment tool should be made routine in primary care accompanied by results that are easy for the patient to understand and actionable for the clinician. 2021 mHealth. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer risk assessment tools and risk reduction strategies have advanced significantly over the past few decades but are underutilized in practice, due in part to limited acceptability by patients and physicians. We implemented a tablet-based Breast Cancer Risk Education Intervention (BreastCARE) tailored towards increasing patients' knowledge about their individual risk of developing breast cancer, increasing patient-physician discussion of breast cancer risk reduction practices, and increasing participation in recommended screening. METHODS: We surveyed patients and physicians who received the BreastCARE intervention and analyzed their satisfaction and acceptability of the intervention. We compared patient satisfaction measures by race/ethnicity and used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the effect of race/ethnicity on measures of patient satisfaction with the tablet-based risk assessment and with the breast cancer risk report. We also compared measures of physician satisfaction by resident vs. attending/NP status. Finally, we identified patients' and physicians' suggestions for implementation. RESULTS: Overall, both patients and physicians were highly satisfied with BreastCARE, with some variation by patient race/ethnicity and breast cancer risk status. The risk assessment tool and accompanying risk report helped transmit complex information in an efficient way. CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-administered risk assessment with a health education component at the point of care is acceptable for both patients and physicians, and represents a novel approach to facilitating health promotion. This risk assessment tool should be made routine in primary care accompanied by results that are easy for the patient to understand and actionable for the clinician. 2021 mHealth. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Physician satisfaction; breast cancer risk assessment; communication; dissemination; implementation; patient satisfaction
Authors: Jennifer Livaudais-Toman; Leah S Karliner; Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske; Steven Gregorich; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Rena J Pasick; Alice Chen; Jessica Quinn; Celia P Kaplan Journal: Breast Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 4.380
Authors: M H Gail; L A Brinton; D P Byar; D K Corle; S B Green; C Schairer; J J Mulvihill Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1989-12-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Celia Patricia Kaplan; Jennifer S Haas; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Genevieve Des Jarlais; Steven E Gregorich Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-12-10 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: M C Turnin; R H Beddok; J P Clottes; P F Martini; R G Abadie; J C Buisson; C Soulé-Dupuy; M Bonneu; R Camaré; J P Anton Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 1992-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Linda S Kinsinger; Russell Harris; Steven H Woolf; Harold C Sox; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-07-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-07-28 Impact factor: 56.272