| Literature DB >> 34805014 |
Shuqi Mao1, Xi Yu1, Yuying Shan1, Rui Fan2, Shengdong Wu1, Caide Lu1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel liver function and inflammatory markers-based nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) for AFP-negative (<20 ng/mL) HCC patients after curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 166 pathologically confirmed AFP-negative HCC patients were included at the Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital. A LASSO regression analysis was used for data dimensionality reduction and element selection. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors relevant to RFS. Finally, clinical nomogram prediction model for RFS of HCC was established. Nomogram performance was assessed via internal validation and calibration curve statistics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve were used to validate the performance and clinical utility of the nomogram.Entities:
Keywords: AFP-negative; ALBI grade; HCC; MLR; nomogram; recurrence-free survival
Year: 2021 PMID: 34805014 PMCID: PMC8594894 DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S339707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hepatocell Carcinoma ISSN: 2253-5969
Baseline and Clinicopathological Characteristics of AFP-Negative HCC Patients
| Variables | Recurrence-Free Group(N=125) | Recurrence Group(N=41) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 106 (84.8%) | 37 (90.2%) |
| Female | 19 (15.2%) | 4 (9.8%) |
| Age, years | 55.0±11.3 | 61.0±9.5 |
| HBV infection | ||
| Positive | 99 (79.2%) | 36 (87.9%) |
| Negative | 26 (20.8%) | 5 (12.2%) |
| Anti-HBV | ||
| Yes | 47 (37.6%) | 8 (19.5%) |
| No | 78 (62.4%) | 33 (80.5%) |
| Hypertension | ||
| Positive | 36 (28.8%) | 15 (36.6%) |
| Negative | 89 (71.2%) | 26 (63.4%) |
| Diabetes | ||
| Positive | 17 (13.6%) | 6 (14.6%) |
| Negative | 108 (86.4%) | 35 (85.4%) |
| ALT, U/L | ||
| ≤50 | 103 (82.4%) | 32 (78.0%) |
| >50 | 22 (17.6%) | 9 (22.0%) |
| ALP, U/L | ||
| ≤125 | 107 (85.6%) | 28 (768.3%) |
| >125 | 18 (14.4%) | 13 (31.7%) |
| GGT, U/L | ||
| ≤60 | 73 (58.4%) | 22 (53.7%) |
| >60 | 52 (41.6%) | 19 (46.3%) |
| PT, seconds | ||
| ≤13 | 104 (83.2%) | 34 (82.9%) |
| >13 | 21 (16.8%) | 7 (17.1%) |
| DB, umol/l | ||
| ≤8 | 105 (84.0%) | 32 (78.0%) |
| >8 | 20 (16.0%) | 9 (22.0%) |
| INR | ||
| ≤1 | 36 (28.8%) | 6 (14.6%) |
| >1 | 89 (71.2%) | 35 (85.4%) |
| Pathological differentiation | ||
| Poor | 29 (23.2%) | 11 (26.8%) |
| Moderate | 79 (63.2%) | 28 (68.3%) |
| Well | 17 (13.6%) | 2 (4.9%) |
| MVI | ||
| Positive | 40 (32.0%) | 28 (68.3%) |
| Negative | 85 (68.0%) | 13 (31.7%) |
| Cirrhosis | ||
| Positive | 58 (46.4%) | 19 (46.3%) |
| Negative | 67 (53.6%) | 22 (53.7%) |
| Number of tumors | ||
| Solitary | 108 (86.4%) | 29 (70.7%) |
| Multiple | 17 (13.6%) | 12 (29.3%) |
| Tumor diameter, cm | 4.31±2.27 | 5.88±3.32 |
| Tumor capsule | ||
| Positive | 16 (12.8%) | 11 (26.8%) |
| Negative | 109 (87.2%) | 30 (73.2%) |
| PVTT | ||
| Positive | 4 (3.2%) | 6 (14.6%) |
| Negative | 121 (96.8%) | 35 (85.4%) |
Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B Virus; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; PT, prothrombin time; DB, direct bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; MVI, microvascular invasion; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombosis.
ALBI Grade and Inflammatory Markers of AFP-Negative HCC Patients
| Variables | Recurrence-Free Group (N=125) | Recurrence Group (N=41) |
|---|---|---|
| ALBI grade | ||
| 1 | 93 (74.4%) | 21 (51.2%) |
| 2 | 32 (25.6%) | 20 (48.8%) |
| 3 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| GLR | 31.05 (4.44,416.67) | 50.00 (8.64,531.43) |
| PNI | 50.8 (26.5,73.3) | 46.1 (31.4,58.3) |
| APRI | 0.17 (0.04,2.16) | 0.22 (0.06,1.01) |
| ALRI | 16.67 (6.3,360) | 27.00 (6.07,342.5) |
| ANRI | 8.80 (1.75,63.53) | 11.61 (1.51,51.25) |
| SII | 296.18 (65.63,3227.54) | 381.27(64.29,3502) |
| NLR | 2.00 (0.47,16.5) | 2.33 (0.95,25.75) |
| PLR | 103.75 (42.5,256.15) | 106.15 (30.91,340) |
| MLR | 0.30 (0.12,1.7) | 0.33 (0.17,5.17) |
| SIRI | 0.83 (0.23,21.45) | 1.01 (0.27,12.55) |
| Child–Pugh grade | ||
| A | 122 (97.6%) | 40 (97.6%) |
| B | 3 (2.4%) | 1 (2.4%) |
| AJCC T stage | ||
| I–II | 106 (84.80%) | 35 (85.4%) |
| III–IV | 19 (12.0%) | 6 (14.6%) |
| BCLC stage | ||
| A | 92 (73.6%) | 34 (82.9%) |
| B | 18 (14.4%) | 4 (9.8%) |
| C | 15 (12.0%) | 3 (7.3%) |
Abbreviations: ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; GLR, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to lymphocyte ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; APRI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio; ALRI, aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio; ANRI, aspartate aminotransferase to neutrophil ratio; SII, systemic Immune-Inflammation; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio; MLR, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio; SIRI, systemic inflammation response index; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer.
Figure 1Nomogram model elements selection of RFS using the LASSO regression model. (A) The LASSO coefficient profiles of the clinical features. (B) Optimum parameter (lambda) selection in the LASSO model performed ten-fold cross-validation.
Univariate and Multivariate Cox Analyses for RFS of AFP-Negative HCC Patients
| Variables | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| ALP >125 | 0.039 | 2.004 (1.037–3.873) | ||
| ALBI grade | 0.001 | 2.719 (1.470–5.027) | 0.003 | 2.624 (1.391–4.949) |
| INR >1 | 0.032 | 2.614 (1.088–6.281) | 0.037 | 2.605 (1.061–6.396) |
| PNI | 0.004 | 0.943 (0.905–0.981) | ||
| NLR | 0.012 | 1.090 (1.019–1.167) | ||
| MLR | 0.004 | 1.828 (1.207–2.768) | 0.025 | 1.769 (1.073–2.915) |
| MVI | < 0.001 | 3.845 (1.982–7.457) | <0.001 | 4.726 (2.365–9.444) |
| Number of tumors | 0.026 | 2.146 (1.094–4.208) | ||
| Tumor diameter | < 0.001 | 1.210 (1.097–1.334) | ||
| Tumor capsule | 0.010 | 2.514 (1.248–5.064) | ||
| PVTT | 0.002 | 4.045 (1.675–9.769) | ||
Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte; MLR, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio; MVI, microvascular invasion; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombosis.
Figure 2Developed prognosis nomogram model for RFS. (A) Nomogram model. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curve for the nomogram model. (C–E) Calibration curves plots of nomogram for predicting 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year probability of recurrence-free survival.
Figure 3Prognostic assessment and risk stratification of developed nomogram model. (A) Risk stratification for recurrence-free survival. (B) Decision curve analysis.