Literature DB >> 34805014

Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) and Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR)-Based Nomogram Model to Predict Tumor Recurrence of AFP-Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Shuqi Mao1, Xi Yu1, Yuying Shan1, Rui Fan2, Shengdong Wu1, Caide Lu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to develop a novel liver function and inflammatory markers-based nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) for AFP-negative (<20 ng/mL) HCC patients after curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 166 pathologically confirmed AFP-negative HCC patients were included at the Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital. A LASSO regression analysis was used for data dimensionality reduction and element selection. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors relevant to RFS. Finally, clinical nomogram prediction model for RFS of HCC was established. Nomogram performance was assessed via internal validation and calibration curve statistics. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) curve were used to validate the performance and clinical utility of the nomogram.
RESULTS: Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that ALBI grade (hazard ratio, [HR] = 2.624, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.391-4.949, P = 0.003), INR (HR = 2.605, 95% CI: 1.061-6.396, P = 0.037), MLR (HR = 1.769, 95% CI: 1.073-2.915, P = 0.025) and MVI (HR = 4.726, 95% CI: 2.365-9.444, P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of RFS. Nomogram with independent factors was established and achieved a better concordance index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.672-0.834) for predicting RFS. The ROC found that the area under curve (AUC) was consistent with the C-index and the sensitivity was 85.4%. The risk score calculated by nomogram could divide AFP-negative HCC patients into high-, moderate- and low-risk groups (P < 0.05). DCA analysis revealed that the nomogram could augment net benefits and exhibited a wider range of threshold probabilities by the risk stratification than the AJCC T and BCLC stage in the prediction of AFP-negative HCC recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The ALBI grade- and MLR-based nomogram prognostic model for RFS showed high predictive accuracy in AFP-negative HCC patients after surgical resection.
© 2021 Mao et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AFP-negative; ALBI grade; HCC; MLR; nomogram; recurrence-free survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 34805014      PMCID: PMC8594894          DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S339707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma        ISSN: 2253-5969


Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the world according to 2020 global cancer statistics.1 Potentially curative therapy recommended for HCC patients with early-stage tumors consists of surgical resection, liver transplantation or local ablation in clinical practice. For the vast majority of HCC patients, surgical resection is the mainstay of curative treatment options. In addition, surgical resection provides better clinical outcomes than local ablation particularly among patients with well-preserved hepatic function.2 However, recurrence and metastasis are the main drivers of poor prognosis for operable HCC patients,3 which is the main cause of death in the long-term follow-up assessment. Since the identification of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the 1970s, it has been a well-established diagnostic and prognostic indicator of increased tumor virulence and is associated with worse tumor phenotype and aggressiveness in HCC.4–6 However, a retrospective analysis found that approximately 31% of radiographically apparent HCC patients do not present with elevated serum AFP levels,7 which largely limits prognosis prediction and disease diagnosis. Some studies even suggested that the postoperative detection of serum AFP was useless and should be abandoned because of the poor sensitivity in AFP-negative HCC patients.8,9 Elevated serum AFP may also be observed in benign conditions commonly encountered in clinical practice, such as liver inflammation and cirrhosis. In the present study, we wanted to explore whether liver inflammatory biomarkers and functional detection could be regarded as the prognostic prediction factors for AFP-negative HCC recurrence when the value of AFP for the diagnosis and detection of HCC recurrence remains controversial. Liver function is another independent prognosticator to predict tumor recurrence used in operative models.10,11 Johnson PJ et al proposed that the ALBI grade was refinement of the Child–Pugh grade and has been widely validated and evidenced.12 In addition, chronic inflammation induces changes especially in the hepatic immune system, damages hepatic epithelial cells, and allows tumor cells to easily evade immune surveillance.13 A handful of inflammatory markers easily calculated by preoperative complete blood count and liver function tests, such as MLR, PLR, NLR, PNI, SIRI, and APRI et al, have been reported to be associated with HCC patient survival post curative surgical resection.14–16 Nomograms have been considered a reliable tool to integrate and quantify significant risk factors for disease prognosis.17,18 An accurate prognosis estimation can help surgeons choose appropriate therapeutic measures for special patients based on a risk-benefit assessment. However, how to accurately predict and find a uniform scheme or standard is a common problem faced by clinicians. Therefore, we aimed to develop a nomogram model to predict the probability of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in AFP-negative HCC patients after surgical resection. The prognostic prediction accuracy will be evaluated by calibration curves, and patients will be divided into different risk groups according to the risk score.

Patients and Methods

Patients

A total of 166 AFP-negative HCC patients who underwent hepatic resection at Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital from September 2015 to January 2021 were included. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pathologically diagnosed HCC; (2) Child–Pugh A or B classification; (3) treated by intended cure resection, which was defined as negative margins with no residual tumor based on the histological examination; and (4) preoperative AFP negative (<20 ng/mL). The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) received preoperative anticancer medication; (2) history of other cancers; and (3) incomplete clinical or follow-up data. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Ningbo Medical Center Lihuili Hospital (Approval number: KY2021PJ218). All research procedures were in compliance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to inclusion. We confirmed that this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Laboratory Examination and Follow-Up

Laboratory examinations included hepatitis B and C immunology, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), international normalized ratio (INR), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), prothrombin time (PT), albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TB) and direct bilirubin (DB); complete blood count included white blood cell count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, and platelet count. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was computed by the formula, −0.085 × (albumin g/l) + 0.66 × log (bilirubin μmol/l), HCC patients were stratified into 3 groups according to previously described cut-offs resulting in 3 grades: ALBI grade 1 (≤ −2.60), grade 2 (>-2.60 to −1.39) and grade 3 (> −1.39).12 The inflammatory markers were calculated by the following formula: GLR = γ-glutamyl transpeptidase/lymphocyte, SII = platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte, ANRI = aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)/neutrophil, SIRI = monocyte × neutrophil/lymphocyte, MLR = monocyte/lymphocyte, PNI = serum albumin (g/L) + 5 × lymphocyte, APRI = aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)/platelet, NLR = neutrophil/lymphocyte, PLR = platelet/lymphocyte, ALRI = aspartate aminotransferase (U/L)/lymphocyte. The cut-off value of the laboratory index was set according to the Health Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China published by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China. Patients were defined as hypertensive based on the “gold standard”, and had at least three consecutive measurements of systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >90 mm Hg. Controls had SBP and DBP of <120 mm Hg and <80 mm Hg, respectively, and first-degree relatives had no family history of hypertension. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria: (1) fasting glucose level >7 mmol/l; (2) 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test showing a glucose level of ≥11.1 mmol/l; (3) haemoglobin A1c ≥6.5%, or (4) clinical diagnosis of the disease. Anatomic or nonanatomic resection was performed after the clinical evaluation, and all the obtained surgical specimens were histologically assessed by different pathologists. Pathological examination results included pathological differentiation, microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor diameter, number of tumors, cirrhosis, tumor capsule, and portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). Baseline data were collected from our clinical database. AFP-negative HCC patients were consistently followed-up after curative resection at intervals of 3 months. Follow-up was aimed at determination of RFS. RFS was calculated from the date of curative resection to the date when tumor recurrence was diagnosed. The preoperative and tumor recurrence diagnoses were based on criteria set forth in the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary liver cancer in China.19

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative variables are reported as medians and interquartile ranges (age and tumor diameter are reported as mean and standard deviation), while categorical variables are presented as absolute counts and percentages. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the Log rank test. LASSO regression analysis was used for data dimensionality reduction and element selection. Independent prognostic factors of tumor recurrence was identified by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Subsequently, a nomogram was formulated to predict RFS based on the results of multivariate Cox regression analysis. Nomogram performance was assessed via internal validation and calibration curve statistics (concordance index was calculated to measure discrimination with 1000 bootstrapping techniques). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to validate the nomogram model performance. Each patient had a total risk score (NomoScore: nomogram risk score) for risk stratification of RFS according to the nomogram model. Patients were divided into different risk groups (low-; moderate-; high-) with the cut-off points automatically calculated using X-tile software20 (version 3.6.1; Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to determine the clinical benefit of the nomogram by quantifying the net benefits along with the increase in threshold probabilities. Univariate, multivariate Cox regression analyses and ROC curve were performed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corporation, 2020, USA). LASSO regression, nomogram, DCA, and survival figures were performed or plotted using R version 3.6.2 (), with package dependencies: “rms”, “glamet”, “ggDCA”, “rmda” “survival”, “survminer”, and “ggpubr”. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Prognostic Outcomes of HCC

A total of 166 AFP-negative HCC patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled from the 625 pathologically diagnosed patients. The median follow-up time was 20 months (1–61 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year recurrence-free rates were 85.7%, 74.0%, and 69.0%, respectively. All baseline characteristics are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Baseline and Clinicopathological Characteristics of AFP-Negative HCC Patients

VariablesRecurrence-Free Group(N=125)Recurrence Group(N=41)
Gender
 Male106 (84.8%)37 (90.2%)
 Female19 (15.2%)4 (9.8%)
Age, years55.0±11.361.0±9.5
HBV infection
 Positive99 (79.2%)36 (87.9%)
 Negative26 (20.8%)5 (12.2%)
Anti-HBV
 Yes47 (37.6%)8 (19.5%)
 No78 (62.4%)33 (80.5%)
Hypertension
 Positive36 (28.8%)15 (36.6%)
 Negative89 (71.2%)26 (63.4%)
Diabetes
 Positive17 (13.6%)6 (14.6%)
 Negative108 (86.4%)35 (85.4%)
ALT, U/L
 ≤50103 (82.4%)32 (78.0%)
 >5022 (17.6%)9 (22.0%)
ALP, U/L
 ≤125107 (85.6%)28 (768.3%)
 >12518 (14.4%)13 (31.7%)
GGT, U/L
 ≤6073 (58.4%)22 (53.7%)
 >6052 (41.6%)19 (46.3%)
PT, seconds
 ≤13104 (83.2%)34 (82.9%)
 >1321 (16.8%)7 (17.1%)
DB, umol/l
 ≤8105 (84.0%)32 (78.0%)
 >820 (16.0%)9 (22.0%)
INR
 ≤136 (28.8%)6 (14.6%)
 >189 (71.2%)35 (85.4%)
Pathological differentiation
 Poor29 (23.2%)11 (26.8%)
 Moderate79 (63.2%)28 (68.3%)
 Well17 (13.6%)2 (4.9%)
MVI
 Positive40 (32.0%)28 (68.3%)
 Negative85 (68.0%)13 (31.7%)
Cirrhosis
 Positive58 (46.4%)19 (46.3%)
 Negative67 (53.6%)22 (53.7%)
Number of tumors
 Solitary108 (86.4%)29 (70.7%)
 Multiple17 (13.6%)12 (29.3%)
Tumor diameter, cm4.31±2.275.88±3.32
Tumor capsule
 Positive16 (12.8%)11 (26.8%)
 Negative109 (87.2%)30 (73.2%)
PVTT
 Positive4 (3.2%)6 (14.6%)
 Negative121 (96.8%)35 (85.4%)

Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B Virus; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; PT, prothrombin time; DB, direct bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; MVI, microvascular invasion; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Table 2

ALBI Grade and Inflammatory Markers of AFP-Negative HCC Patients

VariablesRecurrence-Free Group (N=125)Recurrence Group (N=41)
ALBI grade
 193 (74.4%)21 (51.2%)
 232 (25.6%)20 (48.8%)
 30 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
GLR31.05 (4.44,416.67)50.00 (8.64,531.43)
PNI50.8 (26.5,73.3)46.1 (31.4,58.3)
APRI0.17 (0.04,2.16)0.22 (0.06,1.01)
ALRI16.67 (6.3,360)27.00 (6.07,342.5)
ANRI8.80 (1.75,63.53)11.61 (1.51,51.25)
SII296.18 (65.63,3227.54)381.27(64.29,3502)
NLR2.00 (0.47,16.5)2.33 (0.95,25.75)
PLR103.75 (42.5,256.15)106.15 (30.91,340)
MLR0.30 (0.12,1.7)0.33 (0.17,5.17)
SIRI0.83 (0.23,21.45)1.01 (0.27,12.55)
Child–Pugh grade
 A122 (97.6%)40 (97.6%)
 B3 (2.4%)1 (2.4%)
AJCC T stage
 I–II106 (84.80%)35 (85.4%)
 III–IV19 (12.0%)6 (14.6%)
BCLC stage
 A92 (73.6%)34 (82.9%)
 B18 (14.4%)4 (9.8%)
 C15 (12.0%)3 (7.3%)

Abbreviations: ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; GLR, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to lymphocyte ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; APRI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio; ALRI, aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio; ANRI, aspartate aminotransferase to neutrophil ratio; SII, systemic Immune-Inflammation; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio; MLR, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio; SIRI, systemic inflammation response index; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer.

Baseline and Clinicopathological Characteristics of AFP-Negative HCC Patients Abbreviations: HBV, hepatitis B Virus; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; GGT, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; PT, prothrombin time; DB, direct bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; MVI, microvascular invasion; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombosis. ALBI Grade and Inflammatory Markers of AFP-Negative HCC Patients Abbreviations: ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; GLR, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to lymphocyte ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; APRI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio; ALRI, aspartate aminotransferase to lymphocyte ratio; ANRI, aspartate aminotransferase to neutrophil ratio; SII, systemic Immune-Inflammation; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte; PLR, platelet to lymphocyte ratio; MLR, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio; SIRI, systemic inflammation response index; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; BCLC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer.

Dimensionality Reduction and Element Selection

The LASSO coefficient profiles of the features were plotted. The optimum parameter (lambda) selection in the LASSO model performed tenfold cross-validation through minimum criteria. The partial likelihood deviance (binomial deviance) curve is presented versus log (lambda). Dotted vertical lines are shown at the optimum values by performing lambda.min and lambda.1se. Finally, ALP, ALBI, INR, PNI, NLR, MLR, MVI, number of tumors, tumor diameter, tumor capsule, and PVTT were selected according to the optimum value corresponding to the minimum value of lambda (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Nomogram model elements selection of RFS using the LASSO regression model. (A) The LASSO coefficient profiles of the clinical features. (B) Optimum parameter (lambda) selection in the LASSO model performed ten-fold cross-validation.

Nomogram model elements selection of RFS using the LASSO regression model. (A) The LASSO coefficient profiles of the clinical features. (B) Optimum parameter (lambda) selection in the LASSO model performed ten-fold cross-validation.

Development and Validation of Nomogram Prediction Model

We incorporated the ALP, ALBI, INR, PNI, NLR, MLR, MVI, number of tumors, tumor diameter, tumor capsule, and PVTT into the univariate and multivariate Cox regression equations. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that ALBI (hazard ratio, [HR] = 2.624, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.391–4.949, P = 0.003), INR (HR = 2.605, 95% CI: 1.061–6.396, P = 0.037), MLR (HR = 1.769, 95% CI: 1.073–2.915, P = 0.025) and MVI (HR = 4.726, 95% CI: 2.365–9.444, P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of RFS (Table 3). Incorporating ALBI, INR, MVI, and MLR, the nomogram (Figure 2A) achieved a better concordance index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.672–0.834) with 1000 bootstrap samples to measure discrimination in predicting 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS rates. The ROC curve found that the area under curve (AUC) was consistent with the C-index (0.753; 95% CI: 0.672–0.834) and the sensitivity was 85.4% (Figure 2B). The calibration curves for the 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were largely overlapped with the standard lines (Figure 2C–E). The resultant nomogram could accurately distinguish the RFS of AFP-negative HCC patients and had better consistency between the predicted probability and the observed probability of RFS.
Table 3

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Analyses for RFS of AFP-Negative HCC Patients

VariablesUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)
ALP >1250.0392.004 (1.037–3.873)
ALBI grade0.0012.719 (1.470–5.027)0.0032.624 (1.391–4.949)
INR >10.0322.614 (1.088–6.281)0.0372.605 (1.061–6.396)
PNI0.0040.943 (0.905–0.981)
NLR0.0121.090 (1.019–1.167)
MLR0.0041.828 (1.207–2.768)0.0251.769 (1.073–2.915)
MVI< 0.0013.845 (1.982–7.457)<0.0014.726 (2.365–9.444)
Number of tumors0.0262.146 (1.094–4.208)
Tumor diameter< 0.0011.210 (1.097–1.334)
Tumor capsule0.0102.514 (1.248–5.064)
PVTT0.0024.045 (1.675–9.769)

Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte; MLR, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio; MVI, microvascular invasion; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombosis.

Figure 2

Developed prognosis nomogram model for RFS. (A) Nomogram model. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curve for the nomogram model. (C–E) Calibration curves plots of nomogram for predicting 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year probability of recurrence-free survival.

Univariate and Multivariate Cox Analyses for RFS of AFP-Negative HCC Patients Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALBI, albumin-bilirubin; INR, international normalized ratio; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte; MLR, monocyte to lymphocyte ratio; MVI, microvascular invasion; PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombosis. Developed prognosis nomogram model for RFS. (A) Nomogram model. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curve for the nomogram model. (C–E) Calibration curves plots of nomogram for predicting 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year probability of recurrence-free survival.

Prognostic Assessment and Risk Stratification

AFP-negative HCC patients were divided into different risk groups based on the total risk scores calculated by the nomogram models to judge the discriminatory abilities of the nomogram for RFS. The optimal cut-off points were autocalculated by X-tile software. The risk scores calculated can divide AFP-negative HCC patients into the high-risk group (>116), moderate risk group (54–116) and low-risk group (<54). Survival curves were calculated to compare the RFS rates in three different risk groups using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the results showed a significant discriminatory ability for recurrence risks in the patients based on the nomogram risk scores (P < 0.05, Figure 3A). DCA analysis revealed that the nomogram model could augment net benefits and exhibited a wider range of threshold probabilities by risk stratification than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage in the prediction of AFP-negative HCC recurrence (Figure 3B).
Figure 3

Prognostic assessment and risk stratification of developed nomogram model. (A) Risk stratification for recurrence-free survival. (B) Decision curve analysis.

Prognostic assessment and risk stratification of developed nomogram model. (A) Risk stratification for recurrence-free survival. (B) Decision curve analysis.

Discussion

The nomogram prediction model that enabled risk assessment of recurrence after curative resection has been developed and validated in HCC patients with negative serum AFP. The constructed nomogram prediction model included ALBI, INR, MLR, and MVI which were screened through LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Individuals with higher total points had a greater probability of recurrence-free survival. For example, if ALBI was > −2.6, with INR > 1, MLR = 1, and positive MVI of HCC patient, the corresponding total point was 80, and the probability of 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year RFS was approximately 86%, 73%, 68%. The developed nomogram could accurately distinguish the probability of recurrence and shows a better consistency between the predicted probability and actual frequency of RFS, with a C-index of 0.753 (95% CI: 0.672–0.834). The nomogram provided intuitive and easy-to-understand clinical tools to guide a rational and personalized subsequent therapeutic choice for clinical surgeons. ALBI grade was calculated using only serum albumin and total bilirubin as a simple and statistical evaluation method for hepatic function.12 In a multicentre cohort, Chan et al21 indicated that the overall prognostic performance of ALBI grade-based and Child–Pugh-based BCLC was similar, because of the high concordance of a weighted κ value. Hiraoka A et al22 demonstrated that the assessment ability of hepatic reserve function shown by ALBI grade was adequate for use in the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) guidelines instead of the Child–Pugh classification (CP) and liver damage classification. Previous studies found that ALBI grade predicted overall survival (OS) more accurately than CP in patients with HCC who underwent curative hepatic resection.23,24 Chan et al11 also found that the ERASL model using ALBI grade and MVI provided better discriminatory power for the risk stratification of early recurrence. Several studies even constructed nomogram models based on ALBI grade and other clinical data for predicting the recurrence of HCC undergoing curative hepatic resection.24–26 In the present study, we first found that the ALBI grade was significant independent prognostic factor of AFP-negative HCC following curative resection. The developed ALBI-based nomogram could accurately predict the RFS of AFP-negative HCC patients and had better consistency between the predicted and observed probabilities of RFS. As a prototypical inflammation-related cancer, approximately 90% of HCC burden associated with prolonged hepatitis due to viral hepatitis, excessive alcohol intake, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).27 The immune microenvironment and inflammatory markers are all parts of the systemic inflammatory response and play an important role in cancer development, progression, invasion, and metastasis.28,29 The present study first confirmed that the MLR could be used to determine the recurrence of AFP-negative HCC patients after curative resection. As a systemic inflammatory marker in the peripheral blood, the MLR is low in cost of examination and simple to calculate by monocytes and lymphocytes and can be measured repeatedly. Activated circulating monocytes can secrete multiple proinflammatory cytokines that are involved in tumor development and progression.30 In contrast, a low lymphocyte count is associated with systemic inflammatory responses and is known to promote cancer progression through effects on cell-mediated immunity.31 A meta-analysis demonstrated that low MLR was significantly correlated with increased OS in patients with HCC, regardless of the sample size, type of publication, NOS score, and cut-off value of the MLR.32 Wu Y et al33 reported that the MLR combined with clinical risk factors is helpful for clinicians to identify high-risk HCC patients with early recurrence and improve the prognosis of HCC patients. Although we found a correlation between the MLR and RFS in AFP-negative HCC patients, but not the other inflammatory markers, the mechanism is not very precise. Microvascular invasion (MVI) was defined as the presence of tumor cells within a vascular lumen lined by endothelium that is visible only by microscopy34,35 and considered as a critical determinant of early recurrence and survival of HCC. Tumor cells can spread and metastasize in the liver to form a portal vein tumor thrombus or multiple lesions or distant metastasis in the presence of MVI.36 Residual intrahepatic metastases have been frequently considered as the main cause of early recurrences within 2 years of tumor resection. Recent studies have indicated that high-risk MVI patients did significantly worse with regard to both recurrence and survival,6,37,38 and multiple features of MVI carry prognostic significance for HCC. In this study, our results indicated that MVI was also an important prognostic factor for AFP-negative HCC, which was consistent with a previous study.39 INR was proposed to standardize prothrombin time (PT) reporting by the World Health Organization in the early 1980s and was an excellent measure of liver synthetic function, as decreasing the production of factor VII occurs in the cirrhotic liver as disease severity worsens.40 The INR has also been recommended to evaluate the survival of patients with severe liver disease and has been included in the MELD score. Wang Y et al41 demonstrated that nomograms based on INR and other clinical indices exhibited high efficacy in predicting OS and RFS in HCC patients after hepatectomy. Haruki K et al42 found that a high preoperative prothrombin time-international normalized ratio to albumin ratio was an independent and significant risk factor for poor disease-free and overall survival after hepatic resection for HCC. In this study, the INR was also found to be an independent prognostic factor of AFP-negative HCC as an excellent measure of liver synthetic function. A LASSO regression analysis model was used to construct data dimensionality reduction and element selection in our study. Overfitting, optimism, and miscalibration might be addressed and accounted for during model development by applying bootstrapping techniques and LASSO regression.43 In addition, DCA analysis revealed that the nomogram model could augment net benefits and exhibited a wider range of threshold probabilities by risk stratification in the prediction of AFP-negative HCC recurrence. Although the majority of nomogram studies commonly split the dataset into two subsets randomly, a development sample and a validation sample, this was not done in our study. However, we only developed the internal validation of the nomogram prediction model with a representative sample size to avoid statistical inefficiency or wasted data.44 There are limitations in this study. First, this research is a single center retrospective cohort study, and a prospective cohort is needed to further confirm the predictive value of our nomogram model in prognosis. Second, the nomogram model was only constructed based on a limited clinical database, and other prognosis-related factors and biomarkers need to be identified and incorporated to further promote the accuracy of the AFP-negative HCC nomogram model.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ALBI grade- and MLR-based nomogram prognostic model for RFS exhibits great potential predictive accuracy in AFP-negative HCC patients after surgical resection.
  44 in total

1.  Prognosis evaluation in alpha-fetoprotein negative hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: comparison of five staging systems.

Authors:  X-F Zhang; X Qi; B Meng; C Liu; L Yu; B Wang; Y Lv
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker.

Authors:  Karel G M Moons; Andre Pascal Kengne; Mark Woodward; Patrick Royston; Yvonne Vergouwe; Douglas G Altman; Diederick E Grobbee
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Inflammation and Liver Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets.

Authors:  Yoon Mee Yang; So Yeon Kim; Ekihiro Seki
Journal:  Semin Liver Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.115

Review 4.  From cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma: new molecular insights on inflammation and cellular senescence.

Authors:  Gayatri Ramakrishna; Archana Rastogi; Nirupama Trehanpati; Bijoya Sen; Ritu Khosla; Shiv K Sarin
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 11.740

5.  Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade as Part of the Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for HCC of the Japan Society of Hepatology: A Comparison with the Liver Damage and Child-Pugh Classifications.

Authors:  Atsushi Hiraoka; Takashi Kumada; Masatoshi Kudo; Masashi Hirooka; Kunihiko Tsuji; Ei Itobayashi; Kazuya Kariyama; Toru Ishikawa; Kazuto Tajiri; Hironori Ochi; Toshifumi Tada; Hidenori Toyoda; Kazuhiro Nouso; Kouji Joko; Hideki Kawasaki; Yoichi Hiasa; Kojiro Michitaka
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Risk stratification using a novel liver functional reserve score of combination prothrombin time-international normalized ratio to albumin ratio and albumin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Koichiro Haruki; Hiroaki Shiba; Nobuhiro Saito; Takashi Horiuchi; Yoshihiro Shirai; Yuki Fujiwara; Kenei Furukawa; Taro Sakamoto; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Nomogram to Predict Survival of Patients With Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery.

Authors:  Wei He; Baogang Peng; Yunqiang Tang; Junpin Yang; Yun Zheng; Jiliang Qiu; Ruhai Zou; Jingxian Shen; Binkui Li; Yunfei Yuan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  The Singapore Liver Cancer Recurrence (SLICER) Score for relapse prediction in patients with surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Soo Fan Ang; Elizabeth Shu-Hui Ng; Huihua Li; Yu-Han Ong; Su Pin Choo; Joanne Ngeow; Han Chong Toh; Kiat Hon Lim; Hao Yun Yap; Chee Kiat Tan; London Lucien Peng Jin Ooi; Peng Chung Cheow; Alexander Yaw Fui Chung; Pierce Kah Hoe Chow; Kian Fong Foo; Min-Han Tan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The pretreatment lymphocyte to monocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Song; Chuan Tian; Kai Wang; Run-Jin Zhang; Shu-Bing Zou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Preoperative inflammatory markers of NLR and PLR as indicators of poor prognosis in resectable HCC.

Authors:  Dong Wang; Ning Bai; Xi Hu; Xi Wu OuYang; Lei Yao; YiMing Tao; ZhiMing Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  2 in total

1.  A new model based inflammatory index and tumor burden score (TBS) to predict the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver resection.

Authors:  Jianhua Wang; Zeguo Chen; Liheng Wang; Sijia Feng; Qixuan Qiu; Dongdong Chen; Nianfeng Li; Yao Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Nomogram for the Preoperative Prediction of the Macrotrabecular-Massive Subtype of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yuying Shan; Xi Yu; Yong Yang; Jiannan Sun; Shengdong Wu; Shuqi Mao; Caide Lu
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-08-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.