| Literature DB >> 34804952 |
Gloria Ravegnini1, Antonio De Leo2,3,4, Camelia Coada5,6, Francesca Gorini1, Dario de Biase1,2, Claudio Ceccarelli2, Giulia Dondi2,5,7, Marco Tesei2,7, Eugenia De Crescenzo2,5,7, Donatella Santini2,8, Angelo Gianluca Corradini8, Giovanni Tallini2,3,4, Patrizia Hrelia1, Pierandrea De Iaco2,5,7, Sabrina Angelini1, Anna Myriam Perrone2,5,7.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project identified four distinct prognostic groups in endometrial cancer (EC), among which two are correlated with an intermediate prognosis: the MisMatch Repair-deficient (MMRd) and the No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP) groups. The two groups represent a heterogeneous subset of patients frequently harboring CTNNB1 alterations with distinctive clinicopathologic features. The study aimed to evaluate the miRNA expression in ECs to identify potential biomarkers of prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: MMRd; NSMP; TCGA; endometrial cancer; miRNA—microRNA; personalized medicine; prognostic biomarkers
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804952 PMCID: PMC8597024 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.757678
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Validation of miR-499a-3p and 499a-5p in the NSMP ECs (n = 41) (A, B), validation of miR-187-3p (C), miR-325 (D), miR-499a-3p (E), and 499a-5p (F) in the 72 EC samples (NSMP + MMRd). ns, not significant (p > 0.05); *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
Characteristics of the study cohort.
| N = 72 (%) | |
|---|---|
|
| |
| <50 | 6 (8.3) |
| >50 | 66 (91.7) |
|
| |
| <25 | 25 (34.7) |
| >25 | 47 (65.3) |
|
| |
| E | 62 (86.1) |
| I-DED | 8 (11.1) |
| S | 2 (2.8) |
| CS | 0 |
| CCC | 0 |
|
| |
| Low risk | 14 (19.4) |
| Intermediate risk | 5 (6.9) |
| High-intermediate risk | 31 (43.1) |
| High risk | 22 (30.6) |
|
| |
| Low | 55 (76.4) |
| High | 17 (23.6) |
|
| |
| IA | 45 (62.5) |
| IB–II | 13 (18.1) |
| III–IV | 14 (19.4) |
|
| |
| Absent | 25 (34.72) |
| Focal | 23 (31.94) |
| Massive | 23 (31.94) |
| Missing | 1 (1.39) |
|
| |
| NSMP | 41 (56.9) |
| MSI | 31 (43.9) |
BMI, body mass index; E, endometrioid; I-DED, de-differentiated; S, serous; CS, carcinosarcoma; CCC, clear cell carcinoma; LVI, lymphovascular invasion.
Figure 2Analysis of miR-187-3p in the NSMP alone and in NSMP + MMRd TCGA cohorts (A, B). Analysis of miR-499a-3p and miR-499a-5p in the TCGA NSMP alone (C, D) and in NSMP + MMRd EC groups (E, F). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Chi-square test was used to test the distribution of low/high miR-499a-3p (A, C) and 5p (B, D) expression across the CTNNB1-mutated versus wild-type patients’ subgroups.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival (A, C) and progression-free interval (B, D) in NSMP alone and NSMP + MMRd groups, based on miR-499a-5p expression.
Figure 5Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS (A, C) and PFI (B, D) in NSMP alone and NSMP + MMRd groups, based on the combination of miR-499a-5p expression and CTNNB1 status.
Figure 6Proposed mechanism of action of miR-499a-5p within the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. (A) The complex formed by AXIN, CK1α, GSK3β, and APC phosphorylates β-catenin, which subsequently undergoes the ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation. This prevents its nuclear translocation and pro-tumor gene transcription. (B) miR-499a-5p targets APC. High expression of miR-499a-5p promotes APC inhibition, thus preventing the AXIN/CK1α/GSK3β/APC complex formation. Without complex, β-catenin is not degraded, and it can translocate in the nucleus where it promotes gene transcription.