| Literature DB >> 34804458 |
Ling He1, Zhijin Lin2.
Abstract
Background: Respiratory disorder is a disease with a very high incidence, in which obstructive apnea-hypopnea syndrome is the most harmful. It has become a common and frequently occurring disease, which seriously influences the health of the affected population. The pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) is numerous. With the continuous research on OSAHS disease, it has been found that one of its main pathogeneses is caused by the anatomical characteristics of upper airway obstruction induced during sleep. The narrowing and collapse of any plane can affect the ventilation of the upper respiratory tract. In recent years, with the deepening of research, the importance of the upper respiratory tract obstruction as a source of the disease has attracted increasing attention. Nasal stenosis can cause increased nasal resistance, increased pharyngeal inhalation negative pressure, soft palate collapse, and narrow pharyngeal cavity, resulting in open mouth breathing, which can be the initiating factor of the upper airway obstruction. With the development and popularization of nasal endoscopy technology, domestic and foreign scholars have reported more on the treatment of rhinogenic OSAHS with nasal cavity expansion, but they are different. There is still more controversy; the main controversy centered on the effective rate of surgical treatment and the improvement of objective indicators. Therefore, this study performed individualized nasal cavity expansion for patients with OSAHS who are mainly rhinogenic, from subjective symptoms, objective indicators, and effective rate of surgery. Methods and Patients. Conduct research and analysis to provide references for the clinical treatment of such patients. For patients with the obstructive apnea-hypopnea syndrome with nasal congestion, individualized nasal cavity expansion was performed to study the clinical effect of nasal cavity expansion in the treatment of OSAHS. This article mainly screens cases through big data and selects a large hospital in China to perform individualized nasal cavity expansion surgery to treat 43 adult OSAHS patients with nasal congestion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804458 PMCID: PMC8601791 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6926509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Nasal cavity expansion.
Symbol description.
| English abbreviations | English full name |
|---|---|
| OSAHS | Obstructive apnea-hypopnea syndrome |
| AHI | Apnea-hypopnea index |
| CPAP | Continuous positive airway pressure |
| LAUP | Laser-assisted uvuloplasty |
| UPPP | Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty |
| ESS | Epworth sleep scale |
| PSG | Polysomnogram |
| VAS | Visual analogue scale |
| NMCA | The nasal minimum cross-sectional area |
| NCV | Nasal cavity volume |
| NAR | Nasal airway resistance |
|
| Nasal total volume |
| LSaO2 | Lowest arterial oxygen saturation |
BMI (kg/m2) guideline.
| BMI classification | WTO standards | China standard | Disease risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thin | <18.5 | <18.5 | Low |
| Normal | 18.5∼24.9 | 18.5∼23.9 | Average |
| Overweight | ≥25 | ≥24 | Increase |
| Little obesity | 25.0∼29.9 | 24.0∼26.9 | Increase |
| Obesity | 30.0∼34.9 | 27∼29.9 | Moderate increase |
| Severe obesity | 35.0∼39.9 | ≥30 | Severe increase |
Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
| Item | Never drowsy | Slightly drowsy | Moderately drowsy | Severe drowsy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reading book | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Watching TV | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sit still | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| One hour by car | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lunch break | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sit and talk | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lunch | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Tips: >6 means drowsy, >11 means over drowsy, and >16 means dangerous drowsy.
The NOSE scale for the evaluation of nasal obstruction symptoms.
| Item | Not | Slightly | Moderately | Serious | Dangerous |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nose airtight | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Nose stuffy | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Insomnia | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Movement difficulties | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Statistical distribution of three groups of OSAHS patients at different ages.
| Grouping | Number | Age |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | 16 | 34.7 ± 6.2 | 14.26 | <0.05 |
| Moderate | 13 | 41.2 ± 7.2 | ||
| Severe | 14 | 47.8 ± 6.5 |
Figure 2The number and age distribution of the three groups of OSAHS patients.
One-way variance of BIM in three groups of OSAHS patients.
| Grouping | Cases number | Age |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | 16 | 34.7 ± 6.2 | 14.26 | <0.05 |
| Moderate | 13 | 41.2 ± 7.2 | ||
| Severe | 14 | 47.8 ± 6.5 |
Figure 3The number of OSAHS patients in each group and BIM index in the three groups.
Figure 4Statistics chart of surgical curative effect of patients with different degrees.
Congestion and lethargy before and after surgery.
| Check index | Before surgery | After surgery | T |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOSE | 12.4 ± 2.86 | 4.5 ± 1.77 | 19.83 | <0.001 |
| ESS | 12.7 ± 2.21 | 7.6 ± 2.14 | 23.69 | <0.001 |
| NMCA (cm2) | 0.5 ± 0.11 | 1.5 ± 0.26 | −41.18 | <0.001 |
| NCV (cm3) | 8.9 ± 0.83 | 18.2 ± 3.26 | −19.56 | <0.001 |
| NAR (kPa•s/L) | 0.5 ± 0.04 | 0.2 ± .0.03 | 50.79 | <0.001 |
|
| 5.2 ± 0.47 | 8.7 ± 1.54 | −18.67 | <0.001 |
Comparison of AHI and LSaO2 of patients before and after surgery.
| Grouping | Check index | Before surgery | After surgery |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | AHI | 10.8 ± 2.7 | 6.3 ± 2.34 | 6.92 | <0.001 |
| LSaO2 | 76.4 ± 2.6 | 82.0 ± 2.80 | −12.45 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| Moderate | AHI | 24.4 ± 4.4 | 17.4 ± 6.51 | 6.03 | <0.001 |
| LSaO2 | 70.9 ± 3.2 | 73.9 ± 3.29 | −8.88 | <0.001 | |
|
| |||||
| Severe | AHI | 055.4 ± 14.5 | 53.4 ± .19.8 | 0.81 | 0.436 |
| LSaO2 | 65.9 ± 4.62 | 66.9 ± 3.30 | −1.33 | 0.210 | |