| Literature DB >> 34804449 |
Jiahui Xu1, Xiaofen Li2.
Abstract
Energy metabolism and motion are the essence of dance. Scientific training of athletes involves theoretical guidance in terms of fitness, talent-based selection, and high-performance practice. However, limited research work is carried out on the physiological strain of DanceSport competitions. Therefore, proper channel needs to be established for aerobic-based exercise on participant's performance and general fitness. Competition simulation is used to collect personal data from real-time experimentations. Database gathers athlete information based on age, gender, and performance. Furthermore, results are obtained from experiment, record, and simulation in comparison to evaluate athlete performance. Main purpose of this article is to discover the characteristics of DanceSport from the perspectives of energetics in 32 domestic elite. Finally, World DanceSport Federation Judging System 2.1 "WFJS2.1" strategy is utilized for international game challenges.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804449 PMCID: PMC8601809 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4294710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Basic characteristics of the participants (mean ± SD).
| Dance type | Gender | Age | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | BMI | Body fat ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latin | Male ( | 21.12 ± 1.46 | 177.63 ± 2.39 | 65.85 ± 3.43 | 20.89 ± 1.23 | 16.04 ± 4.30 |
| Female ( | 20.75 ± 1.91 | 164.00 ± 2.39 | 49.94 ± 3.23 | 18.56 ± 1.00 | 23.64 ± 4.08 | |
|
| ||||||
| Standard | Male ( | 21.125 ± 0.99 | 177.63 ± 2.07 | 66.49 ± 6.12 | 21.06 ± 1.78 | 16.69 ± 3.18 |
| Female ( | 20.50 ± 1.07 | 167.63 ± 3.54 | 50.05 ± 1.77 | 17.83 ± 0.89 | 25.55 ± 2.07 | |
Figure 1Characteristics of (Etotal) based on gender difference in simulated competition.
Statistical result illustrating the (Etotal) of athletes in simulated competitions (mean ± SD).
| Latin | LM (kJ) ( | LF (kJ) ( | Standard | SM (kJ) ( | SF (kJ) ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 117.41 ± 16.04 | 84.56 ± 10.73 |
| 100.26 ± 8.17 | 61.38 ± 8.84 |
|
| 122.55 ± 15.16 | 98.74 ± 10.81 |
| 116.12 ± 10.36 | 73.78 ± 10.17 |
|
| 100.28 ± 15.17 | 80.01 ± 10.39 |
| 115.42 ± 9.67 | 75.52 ± 13.20 |
|
| 132.90 ± 19.99 | 103.35 ± 22.86 |
| 103.27 ± 9.28 | 66.25 ± 13.50 |
|
| 128.33 ± 18.21 | 106.22 ± 16.53 |
| 122.87 ± 17.16 | 75.57 ± 11.33 |
| FR | 601.46 ± 73.47 | 472.88 ± 66.55 | FR | 379.33 ± 56.51 | 214.12 ± 28.95 |
Statistical results of metabolic energy system of Chinese athletes in simulated competition (mean ± SD).
| Latin | LM (kJ) ( | LF (kJ) ( | Standard | SM (kJ) ( | SF (kJ) ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 27.53 ± 1.43 | 20.87 ± 1.35 |
|
| 27.79 ± 2.56 | 20.92 ± 0.74 |
|
| 25.14 ± 10.64 | 21.18 ± 5.31 |
| 16.23 ± 9.84 | 12.24 ± 8.16 | ||
|
| 64.74 ± 9.13 | 42.50 ± 9.35 |
| 56.23 ± 12.56 | 28.22 ± 3.73 | ||
|
|
| 28.33 ± 10.10 | 28.13 ± 4.47 |
|
| 25.43 ± 7.63 | 18.42 ± 11.04 |
|
| 66.68 ± 6.38 | 49.73 ± 9.40 |
| 62.90 ± 11.18 | 34.44 ± 3.66 | ||
|
|
| 15.74 ± 7.97 4.73 | 19.87 ± 4.73 |
|
| 21.36 ± 10.05 | 16.34 ± 4.17 |
|
| 57.01 ± 9.13 | 39.27 ± 5.52 |
| 66.27 ± 11.33 | 33.74 ± 4.93 | ||
|
|
| 21.28 ± 12.57 | 23.94 ± 9.94 |
|
| 17.99 ± 8.34 | 17.75 ± 15.24 |
|
| 84.09 ± 9.77 | 58.54 ± 12.43 |
| 57.48 ± 11.55 | 27.58 ± 4.84 | ||
| JELa | 30.66 ± 14.64 | 32.27 ± 8.24Q | ELa | 27.78 ± 12.94 | 17.80 ± 13.23 | ||
| EAER | 70.14 ± 6.35 | 53.07 ± 9.21 | EAER | 67.30 ± 12.39 | 36.85 ± 4.66 | ||
| FRELa | 121.16 ± 49.06 | 125.40 ± 22.80 | ELa | 41.35 ± 13.02 | 32.37 ± 15.88 | ||
| EAER | 342.68 ± 33.37 | 243.11 ± 41.87 | EAER | 310.19 ± 57.92 | 160.83 ± 20.14 | ||
Figure 2Energy system metabolism and gender-based difference of athletes in simulated competition.
Figure 3Energy consumption and gender-based evaluation of athletes.