| Literature DB >> 34804191 |
Shuixian Zhang1, Ling Yuan1, Lin Zhou1, Xia Lei1, Libo Zhu1.
Abstract
In order to explore the effect of exercise nursing intervention for pelvic floor muscle function recovery at 42 days postpartum, this paper conducts experimental research through controlled experiments, combines statistical methods to carry out digital processing, and sets a single variable of nursing intervention to provide a basis for experimental control, and statistical test results are used for effect evaluation. It has been discovered via experimental study that pelvic floor muscle function recovery exercise training for normal delivery women may enhance the mother's compliance with the pelvic floor muscle function exercise. Moreover, it can reduce the occurrence of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse, improve the postpartum pelvic floor function of postpartum women, improve the quality of life, and have a significant recovery effect. In addition, it is a simple, noninvasive, and highly safe continuation nursing measure, which can effectively improve the quality of obstetric care and has strong clinical use value.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804191 PMCID: PMC8598350 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1714610
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.238
Comparison of pelvic floor comprehensive muscle strength.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.91 | 72.10 | 21 | 55.45 | 68.75 | 41 | 41.33 | 58.06 |
| 2 | 60.83 | 56.01 | 22 | 63.66 | 31.23 | 42 | 60.26 | 47.69 |
| 3 | 35.54 | 35.90 | 23 | 25.40 | 37.16 | 43 | 32.92 | 69.30 |
| 4 | 32.96 | 35.12 | 24 | 48.80 | 35.03 | 44 | 32.74 | 35.25 |
| 5 | 38.18 | 34.20 | 25 | 46.75 | 52.48 | 45 | 60.32 | 58.10 |
| 6 | 28.02 | 61.39 | 26 | 71.95 | 33.47 | 46 | 41.96 | 49.93 |
| 7 | 62.30 | 46.11 | 27 | 26.60 | 55.09 | 47 | 51.43 | 47.67 |
| 8 | 49.22 | 62.13 | 28 | 37.89 | 43.85 | 48 | 29.12 | 41.17 |
| 9 | 52.56 | 79.90 | 29 | 73.95 | 44.42 | 49 | 34.75 | 63.48 |
| 10 | 25.13 | 36.15 | 30 | 68.09 | 71.95 | 50 | 28.94 | 81.71 |
| 11 | 29.83 | 36.87 | 31 | 46.26 | 31.68 | 51 | 27.05 | 55.46 |
| 12 | 62.27 | 63.19 | 32 | 70.78 | 34.18 | 52 | 45.69 | 58.15 |
| 13 | 63.33 | 67.56 | 33 | 51.81 | 45.54 | 53 | 57.01 | 77.03 |
| 14 | 58.85 | 60.40 | 34 | 34.30 | 81.47 | 54 | 49.82 | 38.73 |
| 15 | 66.34 | 57.57 | 35 | 26.33 | 77.17 | 55 | 49.98 | 38.87 |
| 16 | 37.78 | 46.90 | 36 | 62.73 | 71.89 | 56 | 56.71 | 83.20 |
| 17 | 69.15 | 51.83 | 37 | 73.50 | 67.86 | 57 | 68.59 | 78.42 |
| 18 | 73.53 | 66.52 | 38 | 59.09 | 43.07 | 58 | 54.56 | 77.86 |
| 19 | 66.35 | 50.74 | 39 | 30.44 | 38.33 | 59 | 31.04 | 44.39 |
| 20 | 31.03 | 46.66 | 40 | 58.57 | 36.21 | 60 | 66.66 | 77.55 |
Comparison of the incidence of urinary incontinence.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.089 | 0.064 | 21 | 0.082 | 0.066 | 41 | 0.097 | 0.055 |
| 2 | 0.098 | 0.072 | 22 | 0.091 | 0.078 | 42 | 0.099 | 0.073 |
| 3 | 0.086 | 0.077 | 23 | 0.099 | 0.069 | 43 | 0.100 | 0.079 |
| 4 | 0.081 | 0.056 | 24 | 0.091 | 0.074 | 44 | 0.093 | 0.074 |
| 5 | 0.088 | 0.076 | 25 | 0.090 | 0.074 | 45 | 0.088 | 0.067 |
| 6 | 0.097 | 0.060 | 26 | 0.091 | 0.067 | 46 | 0.092 | 0.051 |
| 7 | 0.081 | 0.059 | 27 | 0.089 | 0.071 | 47 | 0.084 | 0.051 |
| 8 | 0.093 | 0.078 | 28 | 0.085 | 0.070 | 48 | 0.087 | 0.067 |
| 9 | 0.084 | 0.067 | 29 | 0.096 | 0.059 | 49 | 0.095 | 0.073 |
| 10 | 0.083 | 0.079 | 30 | 0.082 | 0.054 | 50 | 0.087 | 0.075 |
| 11 | 0.086 | 0.066 | 31 | 0.082 | 0.057 | 51 | 0.099 | 0.073 |
| 12 | 0.093 | 0.059 | 32 | 0.086 | 0.069 | 52 | 0.092 | 0.059 |
| 13 | 0.094 | 0.052 | 33 | 0.084 | 0.053 | 53 | 0.089 | 0.075 |
| 14 | 0.094 | 0.079 | 34 | 0.091 | 0.077 | 54 | 0.098 | 0.066 |
| 15 | 0.090 | 0.072 | 35 | 0.085 | 0.071 | 55 | 0.094 | 0.069 |
| 16 | 0.083 | 0.073 | 36 | 0.086 | 0.052 | 56 | 0.086 | 0.064 |
| 17 | 0.085 | 0.063 | 37 | 0.095 | 0.067 | 57 | 0.094 | 0.074 |
| 18 | 0.088 | 0.075 | 38 | 0.093 | 0.076 | 58 | 0.086 | 0.050 |
| 19 | 0.098 | 0.058 | 39 | 0.085 | 0.053 | 59 | 0.089 | 0.070 |
| 20 | 0.092 | 0.074 | 40 | 0.097 | 0.072 | 60 | 0.089 | 0.076 |
Comparison of the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.066 | 0.030 | 21 | 0.072 | 0.038 | 41 | 0.060 | 0.055 |
| 2 | 0.056 | 0.021 | 22 | 0.051 | 0.021 | 42 | 0.055 | 0.053 |
| 3 | 0.064 | 0.056 | 23 | 0.069 | 0.037 | 43 | 0.055 | 0.037 |
| 4 | 0.067 | 0.042 | 24 | 0.059 | 0.038 | 44 | 0.067 | 0.027 |
| 5 | 0.068 | 0.025 | 25 | 0.061 | 0.054 | 45 | 0.057 | 0.025 |
| 6 | 0.064 | 0.028 | 26 | 0.051 | 0.026 | 46 | 0.068 | 0.026 |
| 7 | 0.059 | 0.022 | 27 | 0.050 | 0.021 | 47 | 0.057 | 0.031 |
| 8 | 0.069 | 0.020 | 28 | 0.065 | 0.036 | 48 | 0.072 | 0.031 |
| 9 | 0.052 | 0.036 | 29 | 0.078 | 0.046 | 49 | 0.052 | 0.035 |
| 10 | 0.057 | 0.039 | 30 | 0.079 | 0.046 | 50 | 0.058 | 0.045 |
| 11 | 0.075 | 0.027 | 31 | 0.063 | 0.041 | 51 | 0.063 | 0.048 |
| 12 | 0.080 | 0.023 | 32 | 0.066 | 0.027 | 52 | 0.057 | 0.041 |
| 13 | 0.069 | 0.022 | 33 | 0.058 | 0.035 | 53 | 0.061 | 0.039 |
| 14 | 0.079 | 0.055 | 34 | 0.076 | 0.028 | 54 | 0.055 | 0.041 |
| 15 | 0.065 | 0.041 | 35 | 0.078 | 0.027 | 55 | 0.067 | 0.051 |
| 16 | 0.077 | 0.025 | 36 | 0.076 | 0.028 | 56 | 0.065 | 0.034 |
| 17 | 0.068 | 0.025 | 37 | 0.067 | 0.058 | 57 | 0.063 | 0.023 |
| 18 | 0.074 | 0.046 | 38 | 0.068 | 0.051 | 58 | 0.071 | 0.054 |
| 19 | 0.053 | 0.048 | 39 | 0.075 | 0.049 | 59 | 0.056 | 0.040 |
| 20 | 0.064 | 0.047 | 40 | 0.068 | 0.050 | 60 | 0.074 | 0.048 |
Comparison of FSFI comprehensive score.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.94 | 79.89 | 21 | 76.80 | 72.86 | 41 | 61.75 | 81.69 |
| 2 | 67.00 | 83.26 | 22 | 73.87 | 78.60 | 42 | 79.68 | 66.70 |
| 3 | 63.63 | 87.11 | 23 | 78.53 | 78.15 | 43 | 78.40 | 88.05 |
| 4 | 66.18 | 84.80 | 24 | 72.43 | 84.55 | 44 | 60.23 | 87.49 |
| 5 | 63.69 | 75.82 | 25 | 64.61 | 85.13 | 45 | 60.05 | 70.35 |
| 6 | 81.65 | 83.11 | 26 | 74.94 | 70.72 | 46 | 64.97 | 82.08 |
| 7 | 73.15 | 82.38 | 27 | 66.54 | 85.94 | 47 | 58.07 | 73.89 |
| 8 | 66.39 | 72.59 | 28 | 64.04 | 71.73 | 48 | 58.61 | 86.48 |
| 9 | 78.47 | 82.84 | 29 | 62.77 | 76.18 | 49 | 65.97 | 77.02 |
| 10 | 75.03 | 74.94 | 30 | 69.05 | 78.96 | 50 | 75.24 | 84.54 |
| 11 | 66.35 | 80.17 | 31 | 69.21 | 75.88 | 51 | 74.20 | 66.51 |
| 12 | 61.78 | 67.82 | 32 | 71.97 | 71.88 | 52 | 61.25 | 83.22 |
| 13 | 78.07 | 85.00 | 33 | 66.27 | 82.85 | 53 | 71.44 | 66.65 |
| 14 | 70.95 | 82.29 | 34 | 72.84 | 83.44 | 54 | 63.19 | 70.30 |
| 15 | 59.47 | 74.35 | 35 | 78.79 | 75.14 | 55 | 67.16 | 72.26 |
| 16 | 70.89 | 88.41 | 36 | 80.25 | 78.71 | 56 | 71.48 | 79.14 |
| 17 | 81.62 | 86.18 | 37 | 74.20 | 77.30 | 57 | 65.46 | 86.44 |
| 18 | 71.67 | 87.56 | 38 | 74.90 | 85.44 | 58 | 69.83 | 80.10 |
| 19 | 77.46 | 80.58 | 39 | 80.40 | 78.48 | 59 | 79.46 | 68.74 |
| 20 | 68.88 | 81.33 | 40 | 57.60 | 71.08 | 60 | 60.85 | 75.89 |
Comparison of exercise compliance.
| Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group | Number | Control group | Test group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57.24 | 48.64 | 21 | 28.74 | 78.43 | 41 | 34.24 | 70.59 |
| 2 | 60.58 | 72.31 | 22 | 24.29 | 33.80 | 42 | 39.53 | 79.55 |
| 3 | 36.91 | 51.33 | 23 | 31.24 | 46.12 | 43 | 65.47 | 59.49 |
| 4 | 74.21 | 74.80 | 24 | 50.43 | 55.63 | 44 | 47.14 | 83.04 |
| 5 | 51.67 | 64.69 | 25 | 42.44 | 75.32 | 45 | 61.86 | 81.80 |
| 6 | 46.70 | 57.17 | 26 | 70.12 | 75.20 | 46 | 69.31 | 68.13 |
| 7 | 25.28 | 74.14 | 27 | 69.30 | 81.26 | 47 | 34.21 | 75.85 |
| 8 | 48.85 | 31.07 | 28 | 51.52 | 45.16 | 48 | 48.37 | 63.44 |
| 9 | 71.69 | 46.17 | 29 | 47.00 | 45.24 | 49 | 38.44 | 72.44 |
| 10 | 36.24 | 71.20 | 30 | 63.67 | 34.50 | 50 | 55.67 | 72.41 |
| 11 | 41.44 | 74.53 | 31 | 56.18 | 44.60 | 51 | 46.38 | 55.82 |
| 12 | 36.77 | 83.04 | 32 | 37.21 | 35.37 | 52 | 53.04 | 70.41 |
| 13 | 69.94 | 54.36 | 33 | 44.80 | 70.68 | 53 | 56.53 | 33.70 |
| 14 | 67.03 | 37.20 | 34 | 28.72 | 71.21 | 54 | 34.31 | 75.56 |
| 15 | 54.56 | 34.32 | 35 | 37.18 | 39.46 | 55 | 62.13 | 33.69 |
| 16 | 62.43 | 48.75 | 36 | 33.86 | 70.07 | 56 | 41.99 | 66.35 |
| 17 | 52.24 | 75.84 | 37 | 31.51 | 33.02 | 57 | 70.07 | 58.24 |
| 18 | 65.03 | 71.85 | 38 | 62.98 | 45.35 | 58 | 52.11 | 64.70 |
| 19 | 60.90 | 43.60 | 39 | 59.13 | 39.29 | 59 | 68.70 | 53.79 |
| 20 | 58.33 | 54.66 | 40 | 60.39 | 82.84 | 60 | 52.16 | 55.12 |
Figure 1Comparison chart of comprehensive pelvic floor muscle strength.
Figure 2Comparison chart of the incidence of urinary incontinence.
Figure 3Comparison chart of the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse.
Figure 4Comparison chart of FSFI comprehensive score.
Figure 5Comparison chart of exercise compliance.