| Literature DB >> 34804048 |
Claudia Carranza1, María Teresa Herrera2, Silvia Guzmán-Beltrán2, Manuel Guadalupe Salgado-Cantú2, Ivan Salido-Guadarrama2, Elizabeth Santiago3, Leslie Chávez-Galán4, Luis Horacio Gutiérrez-González5, Yolanda González2.
Abstract
Background: In the absence of a late marker of treatment failure or relapse in MDR-TB patients, biomarkers based on host-miRNAs coupled with M. tuberculosis-RNAs evaluated in extracellular vesicles (EVs) are an alternative follow-up for MDR-TB disease. Characterization of EVs cargo to identify differentially expressed miRNAs before and after treatment, and to identify M. tuberculosis-derived RNA in serum EVs from resistant TB patients.Entities:
Keywords: M. tuberculosis-RNA; drug resistance to TB; exosomes; miRNAs; monitoring treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804048 PMCID: PMC8600136 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.760468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Workflow chart. General strategy in three steps. First step, the exosomes isolation and characterization showed CD63 and CD81 tetraspanin expression in serum exosomes from DR-TB patients. Second step, extraction of both host-miRNAs and M. tuberculosis-RNA. Third step, miRNAs differentially expressed in serum exosomes from MDR-TB patients at T(0) and T(12). In red, the 8 miRNAs selected for individual analysis. BioRender, publication and licensing rights (QX22QHOTQ4).
Characteristics of the study participants.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, yr | 43.5 (19–77) | 45 (27–61) | 0.6859 |
| Sex, male (%) | 18 (69.2) | 10 (66.6) | >0.9999 |
| BMI | 23.2 (17-27) | 26 (23-33) | 0.0050 |
|
| |||
| Diabetes (%) | 9 (34.5) | – | – |
| Alcoholism (%) | 9 (34.5) | – | – |
| Smoking (%) | 2 (7.7) | – | – |
| Malnutrition (%) | 15 (5.77) | – | – |
|
| |||
| RR/MDR-TB (%) | 3 (15.4) | – | – |
| MDR-TB (%) | 21 (73) | – | – |
| XDR-TB (%) | 2 (7.7) | – | – |
| Individualized *(%) | 9 (42.8) | – | – |
|
| |||
| LeukocytesWBC count, x103/mm3 | 9.7 (4.3–18.8) | ||
| Neutrophil count, x103/mm3 | 7.4 (1.7-17.3) | ||
| Lymphocyte count, x103/mm3 | 1.6 (0.9–2.4) | ||
| Hematocrit % | 41.2 (27.2-52.8) | ||
| Hemoglobin g/ml | 13.6 (9.4-17.7) | ||
| NLR ratio | 4.8 (0.9-18.8) | ||
|
| |||
| HbA1c % T2DM | 9.2 (5.5-13.5) | ||
| Glucose, mg/dl | 99 (75-525) | ||
|
| |||
| Creatinine, mg/dl | 0.76 (0.51-1.1) | ||
| BUN, mg/dl | 10 (5.8-20) | ||
| Albumin, mg/dl | 3.6 (2.3-4.4) | ||
| Urea, mg/dl | 22 (12.4-42) | ||
| 109.3 (67-7167.3) | |||
| CKD/EPI ml/min | 104 (64-134) | ||
| CrCL ml/min | 102.3 (49-209.2) | ||
| Nephrotoxicity | 17.4% | ||
| Hearing damage | 35% |
*Individualized include the drugs: standard antibiotics and others such as amoxicillin, clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, linezolid,
clofazimine and dalamanid. BMI, Body Mass Index; RR/MDR-TB, Rifampicin-Resistant-MDR TB; MDR-TB,
Multidrug-resistant TB; XDR-TB, Extensively drug-resistant TB; WBC, White Blood Cell; NLR,
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; BUN, Blood Urea Nitrogen; MDRD,
Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; CKD/EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration;
CrCL, Creatinine clearance rate.
Figure 2Differential miR-let-7e-5p, miR-197-3p and miR-223-3p expression in serum exosomes from DR-TB patients and healthy subjects. Serum exosomes were isolated, miRNAs amplification was done by qPCR. The data were expressed as ΔCT, defined as the relative expression of each miRNA with respect to the endogenous control (mirR-145-5p). Box plots depict medians and quartiles. (A) DR-TB patients (n = 24) and (B) MDR-TB patients (n = 20) and healthy subjects (n = 16), p < 0.05, (TB vs. Control), DR, Drug Resistant; MDR, Multi Drug Resistant. Raw CT data were normalized, and expression differences between cases and controls were assessed by an unpaired two-samples Mann-Whitney test. Only statistical differences with p < 0.05 are shown.
Figure 3ROC curves and AUC values for miRlet-7e-5p, -197-3p and -223-3p miRNAs in TB patients vs healthy subjects. ROC analysis was done to evaluate sensitivity and specificity. ROC curves were used to compare the relative expression of the three miRNAs in DR-TB and MDR-TB patients with those expressed in healthy subjects. (A) AUC and CI to miR-let-7e-5p, -197-3p and -223-3p for DR-TB patients and (B) (AUC) and CI to miR-let-7e-5p, -197-3p and -223-3p for MDR-TB patients. AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operator characteristic. Only statistical differences with p < 0.05 are shown.
ROC analysis for DR-TB or MDR-TB groups vs Healthy subjects.
| Group | miR | AUC | AUCCI.min | AUCCI.max | Cutpoint (-ΔCt) | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DR-TB | miR-197-3p | 0.909 | 0.803 | 1 | -0.054 | 0.652 | 0.933 |
| let-7e-5p | 0.728 | 0.555 | 0.9 | 0.985 | 0.87 | 0.933 | |
| 223-3p | 0.863 | 0.744 | 0.981 | -1.523 | 0.8 | 0.812 | |
| model-miRs(197-3p + let-7e-5p +223-3p) | 0.96 | 0.907 | 1 | 0.714 | 0.8 | 1 | |
| MDR-TB | 197-3p | 0.895 | 0.775 | 1 | -0.054 | 0.65 | 0.933 |
| let-7e-5p | 0.74 | 0.56 | 0.92 | 0.985 | 0.85 | 0.933 | |
| 223-3p | 0.846 | 0.714 | 0.977 | -1.523 | 0.765 | 0.812 | |
| model-miRs(197-3p + let-7e-5p +223-3p) | 0.953 | 0.89 | 1 | 0.714 | 0.765 | 1 |
AUC, Area Under the Curve.
Figure 4miRNAs detection at the time of M. tuberculosis negative culture from DR-TB patients and treatment monitoring from MDR-TB without T2DM. miRNAs expression analyzed at T(0) and T(3-5). The data are expressed as ΔCT, box plots depict medians and quartiles. Lines show the expression change for each patient. (A) DR-TB patients, (B) MDR-TB patients, and (C) MDR-TB without T2DM. Wilcoxon signed-rank test T(0) vs. T(3-5) or T(6-8) or T(9-15). Only statistical differences with p < 0.05 are shown.
Figure 5The behavior of each group of patients, showing the evolution of each patient according to the ΔCT values during the periods of time. (A) The transitions model comparing six times. Upregulation or downregulation in the ΔCT value between time points is illustrated in a heatmap. Blue: upregulation in the ΔCT value in the next time point or the target time point; gray: downregulation in the ΔCT Cs value, and black: no transition between time points. (B) MDR-TB group and (C) MDR-TB-T2DM (-) group. The table includes results of the transition probabilities of the two groups: MDR-TB, MDR-TB-T2DM(-). Each group is divided at the same time point into 2 subgroups according to the ΔCT values of transition: upregulated or downregulated.
Figure 6Mycobacterial 5KST and 30kDa antigens are in exosomes from DR-TB patients. Representative results from amplification fragments are presented as a heat map for (A) 5KST and 30kDa (n =12). Red square = positive amplification; green square = negative amplification, and white square = non-determined. (B) Electrophoresis of 5KST, 30kDa and 16S rRNA amplification fragments.
Figure 7Dual marker evaluation in patients with MDR-TB. Lines show the change in expression for each patient. (A) miR-let7e-5p expression in MDR-TB group, (B) MDR-TB patients negative for 30kDa or 5KST M. tuberculosis sequences. (C) MDR-TB patients positive for 30kDa or 5KST M. tuberculosis sequences.
| miRNA name | Target sequence |
|---|---|
| hsa-miR-20a-3p | ACUGCAUUAUGAGCACUUAAAG |
| hsa-miR-195-5p | UAGCAGCACAGAAAUAUUGGC |
| hsa-miR-328-3p | CUGGCCCUCUCUGCCCUUCCGU |
| hsa-miR-145-5p | GUCCAGUUUUCCCAGGAAUCCCU |
| hsa-let-7e-5p | UGAGGUAGGAGGUUGUAUAGUU |
| hsa-miR-197-3p | UUCACCACCUUCUCCACCCAGC |
| hsa-miR-223-3p | UGUCAGUUUGUCAAAUACCCCA |
| hsa-miR-451a | AAACCGUUACCAUUACUGAGUU |
| Antigen | Primers 5´- 3´ |
|---|---|
| MPT64 | FW: GTGAACTGAGCAAGCAGACCG |
| MPB64 | FW: GACTTCTGGTCGGGGTAGTAAC |
| 5KST | FW: TTGCTGAACTTGACCTGCCCGTA |
| 19 kDA | FW: GAGACCACGACCGCGGCAGG |
| 30 kDa | FW: TGTACCAGTCGCTGTAGAAG |
| CFP-10 | FW: AGGTAATTTCGAGCGGAT |
| ESAT-6 | FW: AAGCTCGCAGCGGCCTGG |
| Ag85c | FW: AAGGTCCAGTTCCAGGGCG |
| 16S rRNA | FW: GCCGTAAACGGTGGGTACTA |