| Literature DB >> 34804039 |
Fabio Guolo1,2, Paola Minetto1, Silvia Pesce3, Filippo Ballerini1, Marino Clavio1, Michele Cea1,2, Michela Frello2, Matteo Garibotto2, Marco Greppi3, Matteo Bozzo3,4, Maurizio Miglino1,2, Monica Passannante2, Riccardo Marcolin2, Elisabetta Tedone5, Nicoletta Colombo5, Rosa Mangerini5, Alessandra Bo6, Maria Rosaria Ruzzenenti7, Paolo Carlier7, Alberto Serio6, Silvia Luchetti6, Alida Dominietto1, Riccardo Varaldo1, Simona Candiani4, Vanessa Agostini7, Jean Louis Ravetti5, Genny Del Zotto8, Emanuela Marcenaro3, Roberto Massimo Lemoli1,2.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CI) have demonstrated clinical activity in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients relapsing after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), although only 20% complete response (CR) rate was observed. The efficacy of CI is strictly related to the host immune competence, which is impaired in heavily pre-treated HL patients. Here, we aimed to enhance the activity of early post-ASCT CI (nivolumab) administration with the infusion of autologous lymphocytes (ALI). Twelve patients with relapse/refractory (R/R) HL (median age 28.5 years; range 18-65), underwent lymphocyte apheresis after first line chemotherapy and then proceeded to salvage therapy. Subsequently, 9 patients with progressive disease at ASCT received early post-transplant CI supported with four ALI, whereas 3 responding patients received ALI alone, as a control cohort. No severe adverse events were recorded. HL-treated patients achieved negative PET scan CR and 8 are alive and disease-free after a median follow-up of 28 months. Four patients underwent subsequent allogeneic SCT. Phenotypic analysis of circulating cells showed a faster expansion of highly differentiated NK cells in ALI plus nivolumab-treated patients as compared to control patients. Our data show anti-tumor activity with good tolerability of ALI + CI for R/R HL and suggest that this setting may accelerate NK cell development/maturation and favor the expansion of the "adaptive" NK cell compartment in patients with HCMV seropositivity, in the absence of HCMV reactivation.Entities:
Keywords: CD56; Hodgkin lymphoma; NK cell maturation; autologous & allogeneic transplantation; immune check point; natural killer cells; nivolumab; programmed cell death receptor 1
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34804039 PMCID: PMC8603402 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.753890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Study Flowchart.
Clinical characteristics of patients.
| Age at diagnosis | Sex | Stage at diagnosis | Previous Therapies and Response | Disease status at ASCT | Stage at ASCT | Extranodal disease at ASCT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL PATIENTS (n=9) | 28.5 | Female: 5/9 | II: 4/9 | – | 9/9 PD | IV: 9/9 | Multiple in 7/9 | ||
| (median) | Male: 4/9 | III: 1/9 | Single in 2/9 | ||||||
| IV: 4/9 | |||||||||
|
| 26 | F | IIB | 2xABVD-> PD | PD | IVB | Lung, liver | ||
| 2xIGeV-> PD | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 19 | M | IIA | 2xABVD-> PR | PD | IVA | Lung, pericardium | ||
| 2xIGeV-> NR | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 56 | M | IIA | 6xABVD-> PD | PD | IVA | Lung | ||
| 2xIGeV-> NR | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 32 | F | IVA | 6xABVD-> PD | PD | IVB | Lung, liver | ||
| 4xIGeV-> NR | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 22 | F | IVB | 6xABVD-> PD | PD | IVB | Lung, liver, bone | ||
| 3xBeGeV-> PD | |||||||||
| 4x BV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 37 | F | IIB | 2xABVD-> PR | PD | IVB | Lung, bone | ||
| 4xIGeV-> PD | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 31 | F | IIIB | 2xABVD->PD | PD | IVB | Lung, pancreatic | ||
| 4xBeGeV->RP | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 20 | M | IVB | 2xABVD->PR | PD | IVB | Lung, bone, bone marrow | ||
| 4xBeGeV-> NR | |||||||||
| 4xBV-> PD | |||||||||
|
| 65 | M | IIA | 2xABVD->RP | PD | IVB | Lung | ||
| 3xBeGeV-> NR | |||||||||
| 4xBV->PD | |||||||||
|
| 52 | F | IIB | 2xABVD-> PR | CR | – | – | ||
| 4xIGeV-> CR | |||||||||
|
| 34 | F | IIIA | 6xABVD-> PD | CR | – | – | ||
| 4xIGeV-> CR | |||||||||
|
| 63 | F | IIIA | 2xABVD-> PD | CR | – | – | ||
| 4xBeGeV-> SD | |||||||||
| 2xBV-> CR | |||||||||
Figure 2Study treatment.
Figure 5Peripheral blood NK cells were analysed for the expression of CD94/NKG2A in combination with KIRs post ASCT at different time points in treated patients (Pt Nivo) and control patients (Pt Ctrl) (t0: pre-treatment; t1: first post ALI + nivolumab for treated patients and first ALI for control patient; t2: second post ALI + nivolumab for treated patients and second ALI for control patient; t3: third post ALI + nivolumab for treated patients and third ALI for control patients). All the patients shown in Figure 5 were seropositive for HCMV, but none of them experienced HCMV reactivation during all study period. (A) Two patients representative of the two cohort are shown. The percentage of NKG2A+KIR-, NKG2A+KIR+, and NKG2A-KIR+ NK-cell subsets/total NK cells are indicated in the corresponding quadrants at each time point. (B) NKG2A+ (Left), KIR+ (Center), and Adaptive (KIRs+NKG2A-CD57+NKG2C+) (Right) NK cells in two patients representative of the two cohort (red squares: Pt Nivo; black circles: Pt Ctrl) during each time point are shown. (C) The percentages of CD94/NKG2A+ (Left), KIR+ (Center), and Adaptive. (KIRs+NKG2A-CD57+NKG2C+) (Right) NK cells in treated (Pt Nivo) (n=3, black) and control (Pt Ctrl) (n=3, grey) HCMV seropositive patients are shown. Data represent the mean ± SD. *P < 0.05.
Figure 3Cytotoxic NK cell/ul before and after ALI in all patients receiving ALI + nivolumab.
Figure 4(A) Analysis of the size and distribution of CD56brightCD16neg/dim, CD56dimCD16bright, and CD56negCD16bright NK cell subsets derived from peripheral blood of 4 treated (Pt Nivo) and 3 control (Pt Ctrl) patients at different time points after ASCT (t0: pre-treatment; t1: first post ALI + nivolumab for treated patients and first ALI for control patient; t2: second post ALI + nivolumab for treated patients and second ALI for control patient; t3: third post ALI + nivolumab for treated patients and third ALI for control patients). Data represent the mean ± 95% CI. p < 0.05 (B) Comparison of peripheral blood NK cell subsets distribution in two patients representative of the two cohort -patient receiving ALI + nivolumab (Pt Nivo); patient receiving ALI alone (control) (Pt Ctrl)- at the different steps indicated in the Figure. ns, not significant. (C) PET scan from the patient receiving ALI + nivolumab at enrollment (upper panel C) and at end of treatment (EOT) (lower panel C). All the patients shown in were seropositive for HCMV, but none of them experienced HCMV reactivation during all study period.
Therapy outcome after ALI/nivolumab.
| CT scan after cycle 2 | PET scan after cycle 2 | CT scan at EOT | PET scan at EOT | Allogeneic Stem-cell Transplant | Disease Status at Allogeneic SCT | Donor and Source of Allogeneic SCT | Disease and survival status at last FUP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| CR | CR | CR | CR | YES | CR | Haploidentical, BM | Alive and CR |
|
| CR | CR | CR | CR | NO | – | – | Alive but relapsed |
|
| CR | CR | CR | CR | NO | – | – | Alive and CR |
|
| CR | CR | CR | CR | NO | – | – | Alive and CR |
|
| PR | CR | CR | CR | YES | CR | HLA-identical sibling, BM | Alive and CR |
|
| PR | CR | CR | CR | YES | CR | HLA-identical sibling, PB | Alive and CR |
|
| PR | CR | CR | CR | YES | CR | Haploidentical, BM | Alive and CR |
|
| CR | CR | CR | CR | NO | – | – | Alive and CR |
|
| PR | PR | CR | CR | NO | – | – | Alive in CR |
CT: computed tomography; PET: positron emission tomography; EOT: end of treatment; SCT: stem cell transplantation; FUP: follow up; PR: partial remission, CR: complete remission, BM: bone marrow.