| Literature DB >> 34803568 |
Ejercito M Balay-Odao1, Nahed Alquwez1, Fatmah Alsolami2, Hanan M M Tork3, Khalaf Al Otaibi1, Abdulellah Al Thobaity4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the influence of eHealth literacy on mental health promotion among Saudi nursing students.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; KSA; eHealth literacy; mental health promotion; nursing students; positive mental health
Year: 2021 PMID: 34803568 PMCID: PMC8591548 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.07.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Taibah Univ Med Sci ISSN: 1658-3612
Demographic variables of the respondents (N = 468).
| Variable | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| University | ||
| University 1 | 128 | 27.4 |
| University 2 | 130 | 27.8 |
| University 3 | 33 | 7.1 |
| University 4 | 177 | 37.8 |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 346 | 73.9 |
| Male | 122 | 26.1 |
| Year level | ||
| 2nd year | 166 | 35.5 |
| 3rd year | 204 | 43.6 |
| 4th year | 79 | 16.9 |
| Internship year | 19 | 4.1 |
| Family structure | ||
| Nuclear | 373 | 79.7 |
| Extended | 95 | 20.3 |
| Perceived mental health status | ||
| Bad | 15 | 3.2 |
| Moderate | 178 | 38.0 |
| Good | 275 | 58.8 |
| Perceived general health status | ||
| Very dissatisfied | 4 | 0.9 |
| Dissatisfied | 142 | 30.3 |
| Neutral | 61 | 13.0 |
| Satisfied | 139 | 29.7 |
| Very satisfied | 122 | 26.1 |
| Mean | SD | |
| Age | 21.44 | 1.73 |
| Perceived effect of quarantine on mental health | 3.89 | 2.67 |
| Perceived effect of social distancing on mental health | 3.93 | 2.80 |
| Perceived effect of mass gathering cancellation on mental health | 3.67 | 2.72 |
| Perceived effect of university closure on mental health | 4.16 | 2.96 |
Results of the descriptive analysis on the eHealth Literacy Scale (N = 468).
| Variable | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|
| How useful do you feel the internet is in helping you in making decisions about your health? | 4.05 | 0.76 |
| How important is it for you to be able to access health resources on the internet? | 3.94 | 0.83 |
| I know what health resources are available on the internet | 3.52 | 0.96 |
| I know where to find helpful health resources on the internet | 3.60 | 0.90 |
| I know how to find helpful health resources on the internet | 3.71 | 0.83 |
| I know how to use the internet to answer my questions about health | 3.88 | 0.74 |
| I know how to use the health information I find on the internet to help me | 3.87 | 0.74 |
| I have the skills I need to evaluate the health resources I find on the internet | 3.76 | 0.78 |
| I can tell high-quality health resources from low-quality health resources on the internet | 3.68 | 0.79 |
| I feel confident in using information from the internet to make health decisions | 3.59 | 0.88 |
| Overall mean | 3.76 | 0.56 |
Results of the descriptive analyses on the Positive Mental Health Scale (N = 468).
| Variable | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|
| I am often carefree and in good spirits. | 3.21 | 0.65 |
| I enjoy my life. | 3.25 | 0.66 |
| All in all, I am satisfied with my life. | 3.28 | 0.68 |
| In general, I am confident. | 3.32 | 0.61 |
| I manage well to fulfil my needs. | 3.40 | 0.57 |
| I am in good physical and emotional condition. | 3.34 | 0.65 |
| I feel that I am well equipped to deal with life and its difficulties. | 3.35 | 0.63 |
| Much of what I do brings me joy. | 3.27 | 0.66 |
| I am a calm, balanced human being. | 3.37 | 0.65 |
| Overall mean | 3.31 | 0.46 |
Factor influencing positive mental health (N = 468).
| Predictor variable | β | SE- | Beta | 95% CI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| University (Reference group: University 4) | |||||||
| University 1 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.92 | .358 | −0.06 | 0.17 |
| University 2 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.95 | .343 | −0.06 | 0.18 |
| University 3 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.48 | .632 | −0.14 | 0.22 |
| Gender | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 1.24 | .216 | −0.04 | 0.18 |
| Year level (Reference group: 2nd year) | |||||||
| 3rd year | −0.08 | 0.05 | −0.08 | −1.50 | .135 | -.018 | 0.02 |
| 4th year | −0.16 | 0.06 | −0.13 | −2.55 | .011∗ | −0.28 | −0.04 |
| Internship year | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.47 | .641 | −0.18 | 0.30 |
| Age | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.11 | .913 | −0.02 | 0.03 |
| Family structure | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 1.72 | .085 | −0.01 | 0.19 |
| Perceived mental health status | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.75 | .456 | −0.05 | 0.10 |
| Perceived general health status | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 1.21 | .228 | −0.01 | 0.06 |
| Perceived effect of quarantine on mental health | −0.03 | 0.01 | −0.15 | −2.62 | .009∗∗ | −0.05 | −0.01 |
| Perceived effect of social distancing on mental health | −0.04 | 0.01 | −0.25 | −3.40 | .001∗∗ | −0.06 | −0.02 |
| Perceived effect of mass gathering cancellation on mental health | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.13 | 1.83 | .068 | −0.00 | 0.04 |
| Perceived effect of university closure on mental health | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.02 | −0.39 | .696 | −0.02 | 0.01 |
| Overall mean E-Heals | 0.21 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 5.93 | <.001∗∗∗ | 0.14 | 0.28 |
Note. Positive mental health is the dependent variable. β is the unstandardised coefficients; SE-b is the Standard error. Beta is the standardised coefficients.
R = 0.168; Adjusted R = 0.157.
∗Significant at 0.05, ∗∗Significant at .01, ∗∗∗Significant at 0.001.