Nehal F Albelasy1, Mona A Montasser2, Ahmad M Hafez2, Yasser L Abdelnaby2. 1. Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Department of Orthodontics, 35511 Mansoura, Ad-Daqahliyah, Egypt. Electronic address: nehaldental@yahoo.com. 2. Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Department of Orthodontics, 35511 Mansoura, Ad-Daqahliyah, Egypt.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Prospective morphometric evaluation of the positional changes and root resorption of maxillary central and lateral incisors undergoing simultaneous intrusion and retraction (SIR) using mini-implant supported 3-piece Burstone base arch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bracket head type mini-implants were inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first permanent molar. After maxillary canine retraction, SIR of maxillary incisors was begun using mini-implant supported 3-piece Burstone arch. A segmental CBCT was taken before and after SIR of the maxillary four incisors. Data collected were analysed using Paired t test, ANOVA test, independent sample t test and Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: Sixteen patients of 17.9±1.94 years mean age with class II division 1 malocclusion, deep bite≥4mm and overjet 5-8mm were selected. All mini-implants showed good stability during treatment with no looseness. Increasing the vertical end of the anterior segment up to 10mm led to controlled tipping and partial bodily retraction of the maxillary central and lateral incisors. The centre of resistance (CRe) of the four maxillary incisors was retracted 2.38±0.77mm and intruded 2.76±1.0mm with a mean change in axial inclination of 9.76±3.45°. The mean amount of root resorption of the four incisors was 1.29±0.59mm over a mean period of 6.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: The mini-implant supported 3-piece Burstone base arch had a pronounced effect on SIR of flared maxillary incisors with clinically insignificant amount of root resorption.
OBJECTIVE: Prospective morphometric evaluation of the positional changes and root resorption of maxillary central and lateral incisors undergoing simultaneous intrusion and retraction (SIR) using mini-implant supported 3-piece Burstone base arch. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Bracket head type mini-implants were inserted between the maxillary second premolar and first permanent molar. After maxillary canine retraction, SIR of maxillary incisors was begun using mini-implant supported 3-piece Burstone arch. A segmental CBCT was taken before and after SIR of the maxillary four incisors. Data collected were analysed using Paired t test, ANOVA test, independent sample t test and Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: Sixteen patients of 17.9±1.94 years mean age with class II division 1 malocclusion, deep bite≥4mm and overjet 5-8mm were selected. All mini-implants showed good stability during treatment with no looseness. Increasing the vertical end of the anterior segment up to 10mm led to controlled tipping and partial bodily retraction of the maxillary central and lateral incisors. The centre of resistance (CRe) of the four maxillary incisors was retracted 2.38±0.77mm and intruded 2.76±1.0mm with a mean change in axial inclination of 9.76±3.45°. The mean amount of root resorption of the four incisors was 1.29±0.59mm over a mean period of 6.2 months. CONCLUSIONS: The mini-implant supported 3-piece Burstone base arch had a pronounced effect on SIR of flared maxillary incisors with clinically insignificant amount of root resorption.