Luciana De Michelis Mendonça1, Paulo Ricardo Pinto Camelo2, Giulianne Cristine Capovilla Trevisan3, Flávio Fernandes Bryk4, Kristian Thorborg5, Rodrigo Ribeiro Oliveira6. 1. Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal do Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucur, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Biological and Health Sciences, Universidade Federal do Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Electronic address: lucianademichelis@yahoo.com.br. 2. Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal do Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucur, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 3. Brazilian National Society of Sports Physical Therapy (SONAFE), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Staff Physical Therapist, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (ISCMSP), Physical Therapy Department, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 5. Sports Orthopaedic Research Center-Copenhagen (SORC-C), Arthroscopic Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre, Denmark. 6. Brazilian National Society of Sports Physical Therapy (SONAFE), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Master Program in Physical Therapy and Functioning, Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hip and groin pain or symptoms is a recurrent musculoskeletal complaint among young and active individuals. It is important to objectively measure functional limitations using patient-related outcomes that have been validated in the language of the target population. OBJECTIVES: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation and to evaluate the measurement properties of the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for the Brazilian population. METHODS: We adapted the HAGOS to Brazilian Portuguese and evaluated the following measurement properties: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and structural and construct validity. The sample recruited consisted of active individuals between 18 and 55 years of age with long standing hip and groin pain and individuals who participated in sports with high physical demand of the hip and groin region. RESULTS: A total of 103 athletes and physically active individuals of both sexes participated in this study. The HAGOS was successfully translated and culturally adapted to the Brazilian population. Factor analysis confirmed that the HAGOS consists of six subscales. The HAGOS-Br showed good internal consistency. The CFA revealed a Cronbach's alpha for the HAGOS subscales ranging from 0.86 to 0.96, test-retest reliability was substantial, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.94 for the six subscales and an acceptable measurement error (standard error of measurement [SEM]=5.43-11.15 points; and smallest detectable chance [SDC]= 16.71-30.9 points). Good construct validity existed with more than 75% of the pre-defined hypotheses being confirmed. No ceiling or floor effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The HAGOS-Br showed to be equivalent to the original version with adequate validity and reliability properties.
BACKGROUND: Hip and groin pain or symptoms is a recurrent musculoskeletal complaint among young and active individuals. It is important to objectively measure functional limitations using patient-related outcomes that have been validated in the language of the target population. OBJECTIVES: To perform a cross-cultural adaptation and to evaluate the measurement properties of the Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) for the Brazilian population. METHODS: We adapted the HAGOS to Brazilian Portuguese and evaluated the following measurement properties: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and structural and construct validity. The sample recruited consisted of active individuals between 18 and 55 years of age with long standing hip and groin pain and individuals who participated in sports with high physical demand of the hip and groin region. RESULTS: A total of 103 athletes and physically active individuals of both sexes participated in this study. The HAGOS was successfully translated and culturally adapted to the Brazilian population. Factor analysis confirmed that the HAGOS consists of six subscales. The HAGOS-Br showed good internal consistency. The CFA revealed a Cronbach's alpha for the HAGOS subscales ranging from 0.86 to 0.96, test-retest reliability was substantial, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.94 for the six subscales and an acceptable measurement error (standard error of measurement [SEM]=5.43-11.15 points; and smallest detectable chance [SDC]= 16.71-30.9 points). Good construct validity existed with more than 75% of the pre-defined hypotheses being confirmed. No ceiling or floor effects were observed. CONCLUSION: The HAGOS-Br showed to be equivalent to the original version with adequate validity and reliability properties.
Authors: Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-24 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Andrea B Mosler; Adam Weir; Cristiano Eirale; Abdulaziz Farooq; Kristian Thorborg; Rod J Whiteley; Per Hӧlmich; Kay M Crossley Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Kristian Thorborg; Michael P Reiman; Adam Weir; Joanne L Kemp; Andreas Serner; Andrea B Mosler; Per HÖlmich Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2018-03-06 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Rachel Taylor; Zarko Vuckovic; Andrea Mosler; Rintje Agricola; Roald Otten; Philipp Jacobsen; Per Holmich; Adam Weir Journal: Clin J Sport Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.638
Authors: Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Dirk L Knol; Paul W Stratford; Jordi Alonso; Donald L Patrick; Lex M Bouter; Henrica Cw de Vet Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Gabriel Nunes de Mesquita; Marcela Nicácio Medeiros de Oliveira; Amanda Ellen Rodrigues Matoso; Alberto Galvão de Moura Filho; Rodrigo Ribeiro de Oliveira Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Matthew N Bourne; Morgan Williams; Jeremy Jackson; Kate L Williams; Ryan G Timmins; Tania Pizzari Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 4.751