To the editor:In a recent editorial,
Block discussed our finding that women who received naturopathic oncology care in
addition to usual care experienced higher rates of recurrence compared to women in the usual
care cohort.
What explains these surprising results?While more women in the naturopathic oncology cohort declined some aspects of adjuvant
therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy those who did decline did
not experience higher rates of recurrence. We found that the stage 3 women in the naturopathic
oncology cohort had more advanced disease at diagnosis. They were more likely to have regional
lymphatic disease (≥5 regional metastatic lymph nodes) at baseline (18.5%) compared to their
usual care matches (13%). Women in the naturopathic oncology group also had high grade tumors
at diagnosis. More advanced disease in the naturopathic oncology cohort was why we observed
more recurrences in the naturopathic oncology cohort.However, another risk factor for breast cancer recurrence after primary treatment is
depression and anxiety, which has been reported in multiple studies to be higher in breast
cancer patients who seek complementary and alternative medicine. Depression and anxiety are
risk factors for breast cancer recurrence and death.
Our research group reported poorer baseline health-related quality of life in this
naturopathic oncology cohort compared to their usual care matches.
However, poor baseline QOL was not associated with recurrence. Even though we reported
that, at the 6-month follow-up, the naturopathic oncology patients reported significantly
higher QOL compared to the usual care patients, we have no data regarding mental health
following that 6 month assessment.These data come together to suggest several important ideas. Recurrence in our naturopathic
oncology cohort was not related to declining some aspects of adjuvant conventional therapy,
including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy. But rather, higher recurrence rates
were related to more nodal disease involvement (5 or more positive lymph nodes) and possibly
related to more depression/anxiety at baseline as well in the survivorship years following
treatment. Together, these data support the idea that breast cancer clinicians should attend
to our patients’ mental health after completion of primary treatment for breast cancer. The
message here is that women with 5 plus positive lymph nodes are at risk for recurrence and,
perhaps as important as radiotherapy or chemotherapy, we must, in order to prevent recurrence
of breast cancer, diagnose, and treat depression and anxiety, both of which are common
comorbidities among breast cancer patients.This was why we started the Seattle-based Advanced Integrative Medical Science (AIMS)
Institute in 2018—in order to offer psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy to our cancer patients
to help them not just to survive, but to thrive and free themselves of chronic depression and
anxiety. Psychedelic therapy may be an effective and efficient in addressing childhood trauma
that is linked to cancer risk, especially in women, as well as addressing the trauma of cancer
diagnosis and cancer treatment. By collecting prospective longitudinal outcomes data, we at
the AIMS Institute, are exploring the hypothesis that psychedelic therapy in the post-primary
treatment setting may improve disease free survival in high-risk stage 3 cancer patients. An
exciting new horizon lies in the use of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy in the treatment of
cancer patients.