Mostafa M Diab1, Richard C Allen2, Ayman E Abdel Ghafar3, Kareem B Elessawy4. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Al Fayoum, Egypt. Mmd11@fayoum.edu.eg. 2. Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of three techniques for removing internal angular dermoid cysts: lid crease, sub-brow, and direct mini-incision. METHODS: In this single-center trial, 47 children with internal angular dermoids were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three surgical groups: group A, sub-brow, group B, lid crease, and group C, direct mini-incision. Outcome measures were operative time, postoperative scar quality using Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES), scar visibility, and family satisfaction. RESULTS: In each group, fifteen patients completed follow-up and were analysed. The operation time (median/IQR) in Group C was significantly shorter (10/5 min) compared with group A (25/10 min) and B (35/20 min) (p < 0.001). Group B had the least visible scar at all follow-up visits. Both group B and C showed superior scar quality using SBSES compared with group A at 6 months (p < 0.001). All families in group B (100%) found the scar excellent compared to 11 families in group C (40%) and 6 families in group A (73.3%). Persistent postoperative inflammation was noticed in two patients in group C. No cases of recurrence were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Both the lid crease and direct mini-incision approaches result in superior scar quality with minimum visibility compared with the sub-brow technique, however, the lid crease technique shows a prolonged operation time particularly for cysts outside the rim.
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of three techniques for removing internal angular dermoid cysts: lid crease, sub-brow, and direct mini-incision. METHODS: In this single-center trial, 47 children with internal angular dermoids were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three surgical groups: group A, sub-brow, group B, lid crease, and group C, direct mini-incision. Outcome measures were operative time, postoperative scar quality using Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES), scar visibility, and family satisfaction. RESULTS: In each group, fifteen patients completed follow-up and were analysed. The operation time (median/IQR) in Group C was significantly shorter (10/5 min) compared with group A (25/10 min) and B (35/20 min) (p < 0.001). Group B had the least visible scar at all follow-up visits. Both group B and C showed superior scar quality using SBSES compared with group A at 6 months (p < 0.001). All families in group B (100%) found the scar excellent compared to 11 families in group C (40%) and 6 families in group A (73.3%). Persistent postoperative inflammation was noticed in two patients in group C. No cases of recurrence were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Both the lid crease and direct mini-incision approaches result in superior scar quality with minimum visibility compared with the sub-brow technique, however, the lid crease technique shows a prolonged operation time particularly for cysts outside the rim.