Literature DB >> 34801504

Environmental DNA metabarcoding for benthic monitoring: A review of sediment sampling and DNA extraction methods.

J Pawlowski1, K Bruce2, K Panksep3, F I Aguirre4, S Amalfitano4, L Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil5, T Baussant6, A Bouchez7, L Carugati8, K Cermakova9, T Cordier10, C Corinaldesi11, F O Costa12, R Danovaro8, A Dell'Anno8, S Duarte12, U Eisendle13, B J D Ferrari14, F Frontalini15, L Frühe16, A Haegerbaeumer17, V Kisand18, A Krolicka6, A Lanzén19, F Leese20, F Lejzerowicz21, E Lyautey22, I Maček23, M Sagova-Marečková24, J K Pearman25, X Pochon26, T Stoeck16, R Vivien14, A Weigand27, S Fazi28.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding (parallel sequencing of DNA/RNA for identification of whole communities within a targeted group) is revolutionizing the field of aquatic biomonitoring. To date, most metabarcoding studies aiming to assess the ecological status of aquatic ecosystems have focused on water eDNA and macroinvertebrate bulk samples. However, the eDNA metabarcoding has also been applied to soft sediment samples, mainly for assessing microbial or meiofaunal biota. Compared to classical methodologies based on manual sorting and morphological identification of benthic taxa, eDNA metabarcoding offers potentially important advantages for assessing the environmental quality of sediments. The methods and protocols utilized for sediment eDNA metabarcoding can vary considerably among studies, and standardization efforts are needed to improve their robustness, comparability and use within regulatory frameworks. Here, we review the available information on eDNA metabarcoding applied to sediment samples, with a focus on sampling, preservation, and DNA extraction steps. We discuss challenges specific to sediment eDNA analysis, including the variety of different sources and states of eDNA and its persistence in the sediment. This paper aims to identify good-practice strategies and facilitate method harmonization for routine use of sediment eDNA in future benthic monitoring.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecosystems; Environmental DNA; Metabarcoding; Monitoring; Sediments

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34801504     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151783

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  2 in total

1.  Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments.

Authors:  Marissa S Giroux; Jay R Reichman; Troy Langknecht; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  medna-metadata: an open-source data management system for tracking environmental DNA samples and metadata.

Authors:  M Kimble; S Allers; K Campbell; C Chen; L M Jackson; B L King; S Silverbrand; G York; K Beard
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.931

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.